infringe

简明释义

英[ɪnˈfrɪndʒ]美[ɪnˈfrɪndʒ]

v. 违反，违背（法律、规则等）；侵犯，侵害（权益）

第 三 人 称 单 数 i n f r i n g e s

现 在 分 词 i n f r i n g i n g

过 去 式 i n f r i n g e d

过 去 分 词 i n f r i n g e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1."OK," he said, "maybe you don't infringe these seven patents."

好吧，他说，可能你们真的没有侵犯这七项专利。

2.Any functionally equivalent product, program, service, or feature that does not infringe on IBM's intellectual property rights may be used instead.

只要不侵犯IBM的知识产权，任何同等功能的产品、程序、服务或特性，都可以代替IBM产品、程序、服务或特性。

3.The MPAA argued that the sole purpose of these torrent sites is to infringe on Copyrights.

MPAA指出，这些bt站点存在的唯一目的就是侵犯版权。

4.But the simple fact is that most manufacturers would rather infringe a patent than pay a license.

但我们必须意识到一个简单的事实，绝大多数生产制造商更多地是选择侵犯专利，而不是花钱获得许可。

5.In addition to changing your personal privacy Settings, you can also report Places that aren't correct or that infringe on your own rights somehow.

除了修改你的个人隐私设置，你也可以报告那些不正确的地点或者在一定程度上侵犯了你的权力的地点。

6.So everywhere one looks, one finds things that infringe copyright in one way or another.

因此，到处看看，就会发现某个东西，以某种形式或其他方式侵犯版权。

7.They said that compulsory identity cards would infringe civil liberties.

他们说强制办理身份证会侵犯公民的自由。

8.The new policy may infringe on employees' privacy rights.

新政策可能会侵犯员工的隐私权。

9.Using someone else's work without permission can infringe copyright laws.

未经许可使用他人的作品可能会侵犯版权法。

10.They argue that the law does not infringe on personal freedoms.

他们辩称该法律并未侵犯个人自由。

11.The company's actions could infringe on the agreement we signed.

公司的行为可能会侵犯我们签署的协议。

12.The court ruled that the new regulation infringes on constitutional rights.

法院裁定新规章侵犯了宪法权利。

作文

In today's world, the concept of personal freedom is often discussed and debated. Many people believe that their rights should be protected at all costs. However, there are instances where one person's freedom can potentially infringe on another's rights. This raises important questions about the balance between individual liberties and the collective good of society. For example, consider the case of noise pollution. A person may enjoy playing loud music in their home, feeling that it is their right to do so. Yet, this enjoyment can infringe upon the peace and comfort of their neighbors. The right to enjoy one's own home must be weighed against the right of others to live in a quiet environment. Furthermore, the digital age has brought about new challenges regarding privacy and intellectual property. With the rise of social media and online sharing, it is easier than ever for individuals to share content without proper attribution. This can infringe on the rights of creators who deserve recognition and compensation for their work. For instance, when someone shares a photograph without permission, they not only violate copyright laws but also infringe on the photographer’s right to control how their work is used. Governments and organizations are constantly trying to find ways to protect individual rights while also ensuring that these rights do not infringe on the rights of others. Laws are put in place to create a framework within which people can exercise their freedoms responsibly. For example, laws against hate speech are designed to prevent individuals from expressing opinions that could infringe on the safety and dignity of others. These laws aim to strike a balance between free expression and the protection of vulnerable communities. Moreover, the concept of infringement extends beyond legal definitions; it also encompasses ethical considerations. In professional settings, employees must navigate the fine line between asserting their rights and respecting the rights of their colleagues. For instance, an employee might feel that their workload is excessive and choose to voice their concerns. While it is essential to advocate for oneself, care must be taken not to infringe on the responsibilities of teammates or disrupt the overall workflow. In conclusion, the term infringe relates to the delicate interplay between individual rights and societal norms. As we navigate our lives, whether in our homes, workplaces, or online spaces, it is crucial to be aware of how our actions may affect others. Understanding the implications of infringement allows us to foster a more respectful and harmonious society. We must strive to protect our rights while also being mindful not to infringe on the rights of those around us. Ultimately, the goal should be to create a community where everyone’s freedoms are respected, leading to a more equitable and just society.

在当今世界，个人自由的概念常常被讨论和辩论。许多人认为，他们的权利应该不惜一切代价得到保护。然而，有些情况下，一个人的自由可能会潜在地侵犯另一个人的权利。这引发了关于个人自由与社会集体利益之间平衡的重要问题。例如，考虑噪音污染的案例。一个人可能喜欢在家中播放大声音乐，感觉这是他们的权利。然而，这种享受可能会侵犯邻居的安宁和舒适。在享受自己家的权利时，必须权衡他人享有安静环境的权利。 此外，数字时代带来了关于隐私和知识产权的新挑战。随着社交媒体和在线分享的兴起，个人更容易在没有适当归属的情况下分享内容。这可能会侵犯创作者的权利，他们理应获得认可和报酬。例如，当某人未经许可分享一张照片时，他们不仅违反了版权法，还侵犯了摄影师控制其作品使用方式的权利。 政府和组织不断试图找到保护个人权利的方法，同时确保这些权利不会侵犯他人的权利。法律的制定为人们在负责任地行使自由方面创造了框架。例如，反对仇恨言论的法律旨在防止个人表达可能侵犯他人安全和尊严的意见。这些法律旨在在言论自由和保护弱势群体之间取得平衡。 此外，侵犯的概念超出了法律定义；它还包含伦理考虑。在专业环境中，员工必须在主张自己的权利与尊重同事的权利之间找到微妙的平衡。例如，一名员工可能会觉得工作量过大，并选择表达他们的担忧。虽然为自己辩护是至关重要的，但必须小心不要侵犯团队成员的责任或干扰整体工作流程。 总之，侵犯一词涉及个人权利与社会规范之间微妙的互动。当我们在家、工作场所或在线空间中生活时，意识到我们的行为可能如何影响他人是至关重要的。理解侵犯的含义使我们能够促进一个更加尊重和和谐的社会。我们必须努力保护我们的权利，同时也要注意不侵犯周围人的权利。最终，目标应该是创造一个每个人的自由都受到尊重的社区，从而实现一个更公平和公正的社会。