infringing

简明释义

英[ɪnˈfrɪndʒɪŋ]美[ɪnˈfrɪndʒɪŋ]

侵害

侵占

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Their site did not host infringing files, it just made it easy to access them.

他们的网站并不包含侵权文件，而只是让此类文件易于获取。

2.Apple's complaint filed to the International Trade Commission explicitly accuses HTC's Android-based products for infringing the patents.

在递交给国际贸易委员会的诉状中苹果指控基于Android系统的HTC产品侵犯了专利。

3.Even if those branches are never accessed, just cloning the repository can bring down infringing code.

即便无法访问这些分支，但只要对仓库进行克隆就可以获得这些代码。

4.Offside is a technical offence and not one for which a caution is issued for persistently infringing the laws of the game.

越位只是一个技术法规，而且也没有一个条文规定不停的犯规应该被警告。

5.I4i, a Toronto based corporation, filed a complaint (PDF) in March 2007 alleging that Microsoft is infringing a patent.

i4i是一家总部位于多伦多的公司，2007年3月起诉微软侵犯它的专利权。

6.SECTION 7 CRIMES OF INFRINGING ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

第七节侵犯知识产权罪

7.As the Little Ice Age progressed, farmers probably moved their fields to lower elevations, infringing on the lands of other farmers and pushing people together, thus contributing to the aggregations.

随着小冰河期发展，农民可能把田地移到了海拔较低的地方，侵占其他农民的土地，把人们挤在一起，从而形成了集群式的社会。

8.The company was sued for infringing on the patent of a competitor.

该公司因侵犯竞争对手的专利而被起诉。

9.Using someone else's artwork without permission is considered infringing copyright.

未经许可使用他人的艺术作品被视为侵犯版权。

10.The new legislation aims to prevent infringing on individual privacy rights.

新立法旨在防止侵犯个人隐私权。

11.He was warned about infringing the school's code of conduct.

他被警告关于侵犯学校行为规范的问题。

12.The artist accused the filmmaker of infringing on his creative work.

这位艺术家指控电影制片人侵犯了他的创作作品。

作文

In today's rapidly evolving world, the balance between innovation and intellectual property rights has become a crucial topic of discussion. One of the key issues at hand is the concept of infringing (侵犯) on the rights of creators and inventors. This term refers to the violation of someone else's legal rights, particularly in the realm of copyright, patents, and trademarks. As technology advances, the lines between inspiration and infringing (侵犯) can often become blurred, leading to significant legal battles and ethical dilemmas. For instance, consider the music industry, where sampling and remixing have become popular practices. Artists often draw inspiration from existing songs, but when does this practice cross the line into infringing (侵犯)? A well-known case involved the song "Blurred Lines" by Robin Thicke, which was found to have infringing (侵犯) elements of Marvin Gaye's "Got to Give It Up." The court ruled that Thicke and his collaborators had unlawfully used Gaye's work, resulting in a substantial financial penalty. This case highlights the complexities of determining what constitutes infringing (侵犯) and the ramifications that follow. Moreover, in the realm of technology, software companies often face accusations of infringing (侵犯) on patents held by others. For example, the ongoing disputes between major tech giants like Apple and Samsung revolve around allegations of infringing (侵犯) on each other's patents related to smartphone technology. These legal conflicts not only affect the companies involved but also impact consumers, as prolonged litigation can delay product releases and innovations. The rise of the internet has further complicated the issue of infringing (侵犯). Digital content can be easily copied and shared, making it difficult for creators to protect their work. Websites that host user-generated content often find themselves in precarious situations where they may be accused of infringing (侵犯) on copyright laws. This has led to calls for clearer regulations and better enforcement mechanisms to safeguard intellectual property while still fostering an environment conducive to creativity and innovation. Furthermore, the debate surrounding infringing (侵犯) rights extends to the realm of social media. Platforms like Instagram and TikTok enable users to share and remix content, but this raises questions about the ownership of original works. If a user creates a video that incorporates a popular song, are they infringing (侵犯) on the artist's rights? The answer is often nuanced and depends on various factors, including fair use doctrines and the intent behind the usage. In conclusion, the concept of infringing (侵犯) on intellectual property rights is a multifaceted issue that requires careful consideration. As we navigate the complexities of creativity in the digital age, it is essential to find a balance that respects the rights of creators while encouraging innovation. Striking this balance will not only protect the interests of artists and inventors but also foster an environment where new ideas can flourish without the fear of infringing (侵犯) on the work of others. Ultimately, understanding the implications of infringing (侵犯) is vital for anyone engaged in creative pursuits, ensuring that we honor the contributions of those who came before us while paving the way for future generations.

在当今快速发展的世界中，创新与知识产权之间的平衡已成为一个重要的讨论话题。关键问题之一是infringing（侵犯）这一概念，它指的是对他人法律权利的侵犯，特别是在版权、专利和商标领域。随着技术的进步，灵感与infringing（侵犯）之间的界限往往变得模糊，导致重大法律纠纷和伦理困境。 例如，考虑音乐产业，采样和混音已成为流行的实践。艺术家们常常从现有歌曲中汲取灵感，但这种做法何时会越过infringing（侵犯）的界限呢？一个著名的案例涉及罗宾·西克（Robin Thicke）的歌曲《模糊界线》（"Blurred Lines"），该歌曲被发现含有马文·盖伊（Marvin Gaye）的《必须给予它》中的infringing（侵犯）元素。法院裁定，西克及其合作者非法使用了盖伊的作品，导致巨额经济赔偿。这一案例突显了确定何为infringing（侵犯）以及随之而来的后果的复杂性。 此外，在技术领域，软件公司经常面临对其他公司专利的infringing（侵犯）指控。例如，苹果和三星之间的持续争端围绕着对彼此在智能手机技术方面的专利的infringing（侵犯）指控。这些法律冲突不仅影响到涉事公司，还影响到消费者，因为漫长的诉讼可能会延迟产品发布和创新。 互联网的兴起进一步复杂化了infringing（侵犯）的问题。数字内容可以轻松复制和共享，使创作者难以保护自己的作品。托管用户生成内容的网站常常发现自己处于危险的境地，可能被指控infringing（侵犯）版权法。这导致人们呼吁更明确的法规和更好的执行机制，以保护知识产权，同时促进一个有利于创造力和创新的环境。 此外，围绕infringing（侵犯）权利的辩论还扩展到社交媒体领域。像Instagram和TikTok这样的平台使用户能够分享和混合内容，但这引发了关于原创作品所有权的问题。如果用户创建了一个包含流行歌曲的视频，他们是否在infringing（侵犯）艺术家的权利？答案往往是微妙的，取决于各种因素，包括合理使用原则和使用意图。 总之，infringing（侵犯）知识产权的概念是一个多方面的问题，需要谨慎考虑。在我们应对数字时代创造力的复杂性时，找到尊重创作者权利与鼓励创新之间的平衡至关重要。实现这一平衡不仅会保护艺术家和发明者的利益，还将促进一个新思想蓬勃发展的环境，而无须担心对他人作品的infringing（侵犯）。最终，理解infringing（侵犯）的影响对任何参与创造活动的人来说都是至关重要的，确保我们尊重前人的贡献，同时为未来几代人铺平道路。