injunctions

简明释义

英[ɪnˈdʒʌŋkʃənz]美[ɪnˈdʒʌŋkʃənz]

n. [管理]禁令（injunction 的复数）；指令；警告

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.We hear endless injunctions to build a sense of community among staff.

我们听到上面没完没了地讲要在员工中培养一种集体归属感。

2.A gang that murders people will be harried by civil injunctions and crackdowns on petty probation violations.

那些有命案背景的帮派，即使稍微触动假释条律，警察也会运用民法严厉打击他们。

3.We hear endless injunctions to managers to build commitment and a sense of community among their staff.

我们听到对经理们无休无止的训示，要他们在其员工中培养奉献精神和团队意识。

4.It is usually the opposite of a prohibitory injunction but there are mandatory injunctions which have a similar effect to specific performance.

通常它与禁止履行命令相反，但是在强制履行中也会有一些强制性的命令。

5.The lawyers threatened “proceedings to include claims for injunctions, damages, interest and legal costs (which could be substantial).”(7)

俱乐部的律师威胁“诉讼程序将包括申请禁止令，要求赔偿相关的损害、利息和诉讼费用（数额可能很庞大）。”

6.In the past decade, the Justice Department's tax Division has obtained injunctions against hundreds of tax return preparers and tax fraud promoters.

在过去十年里，司法部税务司已经取得了成百上千份禁制令来打击税务欺诈推动者。

7.The court issued several injunctions to prevent the company from polluting the river.

法院发布了几项禁令，以防止公司污染河流。

8.After the protest, the mayor sought injunctions against the demonstrators.

抗议后，市长寻求对示威者的禁令。

9.The injunctions were aimed at stopping the unauthorized use of the trademark.

这些禁令旨在阻止对商标的未经授权使用。

10.She filed for injunctions to stop her neighbor from building a fence on her property.

她申请了禁令，以阻止邻居在她的财产上建造围栏。

11.The judge granted temporary injunctions until the full hearing could take place.

法官授予了临时禁令，直到全面听证会能够进行。

作文

In the realm of law, the term injunctions refers to court orders that compel a party to do or refrain from specific acts. These legal remedies serve as powerful tools to prevent harm and ensure compliance with the law. An injunction can be temporary or permanent, depending on the circumstances surrounding the case. For instance, if a company is found to be infringing on a patent, the court may issue a temporary injunction to halt production until a final decision is made. This not only protects the rights of the patent holder but also maintains fair competition in the marketplace. The issuance of injunctions is based on several factors including the likelihood of success on the merits of the case, the potential for irreparable harm, and the balance of equities between the parties involved. When a plaintiff seeks an injunction, they must demonstrate that without it, they would suffer significant damage that cannot be adequately compensated by monetary damages alone. This aspect highlights the importance of injunctions in situations where financial compensation is insufficient to rectify the harm caused. Moreover, injunctions play a crucial role in protecting public interests. For example, environmental groups often seek injunctions to stop activities that may cause irreversible damage to ecosystems. By granting these injunctions, courts help uphold environmental laws and regulations, ensuring that companies adhere to standards that safeguard natural resources. This demonstrates how injunctions are not only beneficial to individual parties but also serve a broader societal purpose. However, the use of injunctions is not without controversy. Critics argue that they can sometimes be misused to stifle competition or suppress free speech. For instance, a business might seek an injunction against a competitor to prevent them from advertising their products, claiming that such advertisements are misleading. In such cases, the court must carefully weigh the merits of the request against the potential for abuse. This highlights the delicate balance that courts must maintain when considering injunctions. In conclusion, injunctions are essential legal instruments that serve to protect rights, prevent harm, and uphold the rule of law. They are particularly vital in cases where monetary damages are inadequate to address the issues at hand. While they provide significant benefits, the potential for misuse necessitates careful judicial scrutiny. As society continues to evolve, the role of injunctions will remain a critical aspect of the legal landscape, reflecting the ongoing struggle to balance individual rights with collective interests.

在法律领域，术语injunctions指的是法院命令，要求一方做出或停止特定行为。这些法律救济作为强有力的工具，旨在防止伤害并确保遵守法律。injunction可以是临时的或永久的，这取决于案件的具体情况。例如，如果一家公司被发现侵犯了专利，法院可能会发出临时injunction，以暂停生产，直到作出最终决定。这不仅保护了专利持有者的权利，还维护了市场上的公平竞争。 发放injunctions基于几个因素，包括案件成功的可能性、不可逆转伤害的潜力以及涉及各方之间的权益平衡。当原告寻求injunction时，他们必须证明，如果没有它，他们将遭受无法仅通过金钱赔偿来弥补的重大损失。这一点突显了injunctions在财务赔偿不足以纠正所造成的伤害的情况下的重要性。 此外，injunctions在保护公共利益方面也发挥着至关重要的作用。例如，环保组织经常寻求injunctions以阻止可能对生态系统造成不可逆转损害的活动。通过授予这些injunctions，法院帮助维护环境法律和法规，确保公司遵守保护自然资源的标准。这表明injunctions不仅对个人当事方有益，而且服务于更广泛的社会目的。 然而，使用injunctions并非没有争议。批评者认为，它们有时可能被滥用，以压制竞争或言论自由。例如，一家公司可能会寻求对竞争对手的injunction，以阻止他们宣传产品，声称这些广告具有误导性。在这种情况下，法院必须仔细权衡请求的优点与潜在的滥用。这突显了法院在考虑injunctions时必须保持的微妙平衡。 总之，injunctions是保护权利、防止伤害和维护法治的重要法律工具。它们在金钱赔偿不足以解决问题的案件中尤为重要。虽然它们提供了显著的好处，但滥用的潜力需要谨慎的司法审查。随着社会的不断发展，injunctions的角色将继续成为法律领域的关键方面，反映出个人权利与集体利益之间的持续斗争。