interventionist

简明释义

英[ˌɪntəˈvenʃənɪst]美[ˌɪntərˈvenʃənɪst]

adj. 干涉主义的

n. 干涉主义者

复 数 i n t e r v e n t i o n i s t s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.A look at the figures makes clear that Seoul has not been pursuing an interventionist policy.

从下面的一组数据中就能看出，韩国不曾奉行干预政策。

2.Maybe, their reaction also had something to do with the fact that it is now fashionable to be an interventionist dad.

另一方面，它也反映了一个现实，即分担内务的爸爸已经成了一种时尚。

3.It is now abundantly clear that China is prepared to take an active and interventionist role in international financial affairs.

现在已经非常清楚，中国准备好了要在国际金融事务中充当积极干预的角色。

4.Mr Stark stepped down in apparent protest at the central bank's increasingly interventionist role in shoring up weaker countries in the euro zone.

斯塔克辞职显然是因为反对欧洲央行购买欧元区负债国家债券的干预政策。

5.The artists and groups involved in the exhibition forum live and work in Hamburg and Shanghai and have been dealing with urban and public space in a performative or interventionist way.

所有参展的汉堡、上海的艺术家及艺术团体都用一种行为表达或干预的方式阐释城市空共空间。

6.This is not only a policy imposed for its own sake, but an inevitable result of most of the other interventionist policies.

实施通货膨胀政策并不单纯是因为其自身的缘故，而且它同样也是其他经济干预政策所带来的一个不可避免的结果。

7.The government's decision to intervene in the economy was seen as an interventionist 干预主义者 approach.

政府决定干预经济被视为一种干预主义者的做法。

8.Many argue that an interventionist 干预主义者 foreign policy can lead to unintended consequences.

许多人认为，干预主义者的外交政策可能会导致意想不到的后果。

9.The interventionist 干预主义者 stance of the United Nations has been controversial among member states.

联合国的干预主义者立场在成员国中引发了争议。

10.Critics of the interventionist 干预主义者 policies believe that they infringe on national sovereignty.

批评干预主义者政策的人认为这些政策侵犯了国家主权。

11.An interventionist 干预主义者 approach in healthcare can improve access for underserved populations.

在医疗保健中采取干预主义者的方法可以改善服务不足人群的获取渠道。

作文

In today's globalized world, the role of governments and international organizations has become increasingly complex, leading to various debates surrounding the concept of an interventionist approach in foreign policy. An interventionist is someone who advocates for active involvement in the affairs of other nations, often through military or economic means. This essay will explore the implications of interventionist policies, their historical context, and the arguments for and against such approaches. Historically, interventionist policies have been a significant part of international relations. For instance, the United States' involvement in World War II is often cited as a necessary intervention that helped defeat fascism. The subsequent establishment of the United Nations was also a result of a collective desire to prevent future conflicts through cooperative intervention. Proponents of interventionist policies argue that these actions are essential for maintaining global stability and protecting human rights. They believe that when a government fails to protect its citizens or commits atrocities, the international community has a moral obligation to intervene. On the other hand, critics of interventionist strategies often point to the unintended consequences of such actions. For example, the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 was justified by the belief that it would lead to the establishment of democracy and stability in the region. However, the aftermath saw a rise in sectarian violence and the emergence of extremist groups, illustrating how interventionist policies can sometimes exacerbate the very problems they aim to solve. Critics argue that instead of fostering peace, interventions can lead to prolonged conflicts and suffering. Another aspect to consider is the sovereignty of nations. Many countries view interventionist actions as violations of their sovereignty, which can lead to resentment and resistance against foreign powers. This sentiment is particularly strong in regions with a history of colonialism, where interventions are seen as neocolonial attempts to exert control over weaker nations. As a result, the legitimacy of interventionist policies is often questioned, leading to a call for more diplomatic and non-invasive methods of addressing international issues. Furthermore, the rise of global challenges such as climate change, pandemics, and terrorism necessitates collaboration rather than unilateral interventionist actions. These issues transcend borders and require a collective response from the international community. In this context, some argue that resources should be directed towards multilateral efforts rather than military interventions. This perspective emphasizes the need for dialogue, negotiation, and mutual respect among nations. In conclusion, the debate surrounding interventionist policies is multifaceted and requires careful consideration of historical precedents, ethical implications, and the complexities of modern geopolitics. While there are compelling arguments for the necessity of intervention in certain situations, it is crucial to weigh these against the potential for negative outcomes and respect for national sovereignty. Ultimately, finding a balance between intervention and diplomacy may be the key to addressing global challenges effectively while minimizing harm to affected nations. As we navigate this intricate landscape, the lessons learned from past interventionist actions should guide our future decisions in international relations.

在当今全球化的世界中，政府和国际组织的角色变得越来越复杂，这导致了围绕外交政策中“干预主义者”概念的各种辩论。“干预主义者”是指主张积极介入其他国家事务的人，通常通过军事或经济手段。本文将探讨干预主义者政策的影响、历史背景以及支持和反对这种方法的论据。 历史上，干预主义者政策一直是国际关系的重要组成部分。例如，美国参与第二次世界大战常被视为必要的干预，帮助击败法西斯主义。随后的联合国成立也是出于共同希望通过合作干预来防止未来冲突的愿望。干预主义者政策的支持者认为，这些行动对于维护全球稳定和保护人权至关重要。他们认为，当一个政府未能保护其公民或实施暴行时，国际社会有道德义务进行干预。 另一方面，干预主义者策略的批评者常常指出这些行动的意外后果。例如，美国在2003年入侵伊拉克的理由是相信这将导致该地区民主和稳定的建立。然而，事后看来，这场战争引发了宗派暴力的加剧和极端主义团体的崛起，说明干预主义者政策有时会加剧他们试图解决的问题。批评者认为，与其促进和平，干预往往导致长期冲突和痛苦。 另一个需要考虑的方面是国家的主权。许多国家将干预主义者行为视为对其主权的侵犯，这可能导致对外国势力的不满和抵制。这种情绪在具有殖民历史的地区尤其强烈，在这些地区，干预被视为对较弱国家施加控制的新时代殖民尝试。因此，干预主义者政策的合法性常常受到质疑，导致人们呼吁采取更具外交性和非侵入性的方法来解决国际问题。 此外，气候变化、流行病和恐怖主义等全球性挑战的出现需要合作，而不是单边的干预主义者行动。这些问题超越国界，需要国际社会的集体响应。在这种背景下，有人认为资源应该用于多边努力，而不是军事干预。这种观点强调各国之间需要对话、谈判和相互尊重。 总之，围绕干预主义者政策的辩论是多方面的，需要仔细考虑历史先例、伦理影响以及现代地缘政治的复杂性。尽管在某些情况下，干预的必要性有令人信服的论据，但必须将这些论据与潜在的负面结果和对国家主权的尊重进行权衡。最终，找到干预与外交之间的平衡，可能是有效应对全球挑战的关键，同时最小化对受影响国家的伤害。在我们应对这一复杂局面时，从过去的干预主义者行为中吸取的教训应指导我们在国际关系中的未来决策。