invalidate

简明释义

英[ɪnˈvælɪdeɪt]美[ɪnˈvælɪdeɪt]

v. （对论点、声明或理论）驳斥，证明是谬误的；使无效，使作废

第 三 人 称 单 数 i n v a l i d a t e s

现 在 分 词 i n v a l i d a t i n g

过 去 式 i n v a l i d a t e d

过 去 分 词 i n v a l i d a t e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.

实际上，白宫声称能让其不赞成的任何合法州法律作废。

2.To change them will invalidate most existing RDF which refers to your Web site.

若要更改它们，将会使引用Web站点的大多数现有rdf失效。

3.Of course, if you write too broadly you may invalidate your claim, because it will read on the prior art.

当然了，如果内容过于宽泛，可能无法获得批准，因为毕竟要与先前技术相比较。

4.Adding unspecified properties to a resource does not invalidate the data.

向资源添加未指定的属性不会使数据无效。

5.The benefit here is that you can simply change that parameter to false to invalidate that rule.

这里的好处在于，您只需将该参数更改为false即可取消该规则。

6.These errors no more invalidate Ms. Merian's work.

这些错误和查尔斯·达尔文或艾萨克·牛顿发表的著名错误观点一样，并不能推翻梅里安女士的工作。

7.The new evidence will invalidate the previous findings.

新证据将使之前的发现无效。

8.If you don't sign the contract, it may invalidate the agreement.

如果你不签合同，这可能会使协议无效。

9.The court ruled that the confession was obtained under duress, which would invalidate it.

法庭裁定该供词是在胁迫下获得的，这将使其无效。

10.Any changes made after the deadline will invalidate your application.

截止日期后所做的任何更改将使你的申请无效。

11.Failure to follow the instructions may invalidate your warranty.

未能遵循说明可能会使你的保修无效。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, the importance of critical thinking cannot be overstated. Individuals are constantly bombarded with information from various sources, including social media, news outlets, and personal interactions. In this context, it is essential to develop the ability to analyze and evaluate the information we receive. One common pitfall in this process is the tendency to invalidate differing opinions without fully understanding their context or reasoning. This behavior can lead to a narrow-minded perspective that discourages open dialogue and stifles intellectual growth. When we invalidate someone else's viewpoint, we often do so by dismissing their arguments based on preconceived notions or biases. For instance, if a person expresses a belief that contradicts our own, we might quickly reject their perspective as misguided or uninformed. However, this reaction not only undermines the other person's credibility but also limits our own understanding of the issue at hand. By failing to engage with opposing views, we risk entrenching ourselves in echo chambers where our beliefs go unchallenged. Moreover, invalidating others' opinions can have detrimental effects on relationships. When people feel that their thoughts and feelings are not respected, they may become defensive or withdraw from conversations altogether. This creates an environment where healthy debate is discouraged, and meaningful connections are strained. To foster constructive dialogue, it is crucial to approach discussions with an open mind and a willingness to consider alternative perspectives. To illustrate this point, consider a scenario where two friends engage in a discussion about climate change. One friend believes that immediate action is necessary to combat the crisis, while the other is skeptical about the severity of the issue. If the first friend responds by invalidating the second's concerns, insisting that they are simply misinformed, the conversation is likely to become contentious. Instead, a more productive approach would involve listening actively and asking questions to understand the reasons behind the skepticism. This not only promotes a healthier exchange of ideas but also encourages mutual respect. Furthermore, invalidating differing opinions can hinder personal growth. Exposure to diverse viewpoints challenges our beliefs and encourages us to think critically about our positions. When we engage with ideas that oppose our own, we are prompted to reevaluate our assumptions and consider new evidence. This process can lead to greater intellectual flexibility and a deeper understanding of complex issues. In conclusion, the act of invalidating others' opinions is a barrier to effective communication and personal development. By embracing open-mindedness and fostering respectful dialogue, we can create an environment conducive to learning and growth. It is essential to recognize the value of differing perspectives and to engage with them thoughtfully. In doing so, we not only enhance our understanding of the world but also build stronger relationships with those around us. Ultimately, the ability to listen, empathize, and engage with others will enrich our lives and contribute to a more informed and compassionate society.

在当今快节奏的世界中，批判性思维的重要性不容忽视。个人不断受到来自社交媒体、新闻媒体和个人互动等各种来源的信息轰炸。在这种情况下，发展分析和评估我们所接收信息的能力至关重要。在这个过程中，一个常见的陷阱是倾向于在没有充分理解其背景或推理的情况下无效化不同的观点。这种行为可能导致狭隘的视角，阻碍开放对话并压制智力成长。 当我们无效化其他人的观点时，通常是基于先入为主的观念或偏见来驳回他们的论点。例如，如果一个人表达的信念与我们的相悖，我们可能会迅速拒绝他们的观点，认为他们是误入歧途或缺乏信息。然而，这种反应不仅削弱了对方的可信度，还限制了我们对问题的理解。通过未能与相反的观点进行互动，我们冒着陷入回音室的风险，在那里我们的信念得不到挑战。 此外，无效化他人的意见可能会对关系产生不利影响。当人们感到自己的思想和感受不被尊重时，他们可能会变得防御或完全退出对话。这创造了一种健康辩论受到抑制、意义深远的联系受到损害的环境。为了促进建设性对话，至关重要的是以开放的心态和考虑替代观点的意愿来接近讨论。 为了说明这一点，考虑一个场景，其中两个朋友就气候变化展开讨论。一个朋友相信必须立即采取行动来应对危机，而另一个人则对问题的严重性持怀疑态度。如果第一个朋友通过无效化第二个朋友的担忧来回应，坚决认为他们只是误解了情况，那么这场对话很可能会变得紧张。相反，更具建设性的方法将涉及积极倾听并提问，以理解怀疑背后的原因。这不仅促进了更健康的思想交流，还鼓励了相互尊重。 此外，无效化不同的意见可能会阻碍个人成长。接触多样的观点挑战我们的信念，并促使我们批判性地思考自己的立场。当我们与对立的思想进行互动时，我们会被促使重新评估我们的假设并考虑新的证据。这个过程可以导致更大的智力灵活性和对复杂问题的更深入理解。 总之，无效化他人意见的行为是有效沟通和个人发展的障碍。通过接受开放的心态和促进尊重的对话，我们可以创造一个有利于学习和成长的环境。认识到不同观点的价值并以深思熟虑的方式与之互动至关重要。在这样做时，我们不仅增强了对世界的理解，还与周围的人建立了更强的关系。最终，倾听、同情和与他人互动的能力将丰富我们的生活，并为一个更具信息化和富有同情心的社会做出贡献。