isolationist

简明释义

英[ˌaɪsəˈleɪʃənɪst]美[ˌaɪsəˈleɪʃənɪst]

n. 孤立主义者

adj. 孤立主义的；孤立主义者的

复 数 i s o l a t i o n i s t s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The isolationist, one of the more unusual eating types, approaches the plate methodically, eating one food item in itsentirety before moving on to the next.

孤立主义是种更为鲜见的饮食类型，孤立主义者有条不紊地进食，完全吃完一种食物才接着吃下一种。

2.She adds: "at the same time Russia is becoming increasingly isolationist."

她还补充道：“与此同时，俄罗斯还变得越来越孤立了。”

3.They even set up their own news agency to peddle anti-isolationist propaganda.

他们甚至建立了自己的新闻机构以散布反孤立主义思想。

4.Vori is an isolationist nation.

凡里是一个与世隔绝的国家。

5.While speaking out against Hitler's atrocities, the American people generally favored isolationist policies and neutrality.

在公开反对希特勒暴行的同时，美国人民普遍赞成孤立主义政策和中间立场。

6.American conservatism, before he began to shake it up, was dour, backward-looking, anti-intellectual and isolationist, especially when viewed from the east coast.

克里斯托使美国保守主义脱胎换骨前，它一直留与世人（尤其东部人）刻板与保守的印象，它敌视知识分子，顽守孤立主义。

7.Similarly, many Europeans may yearn for a less interventionist America; but an isolationist superpower could be much more frightening.

同样，许多欧洲人都渴望看到一个不带太多干涉主义的美国。但是，一个实行孤立主义的强权可能会更加可怕。

8.Feedback system has been cut off, leading into the Regal isolationist, in the decision will become illiterate.

反馈信息系统被切断，领导就成了“孤家寡人”，在决策上就成了“睁眼瞎”。

9.This does not mean that America should become more isolationist.

这并不意味着美国应该更加孤立自己。

10.The politician's stance was decidedly isolationist, focusing on national interests over global engagement.

这位政治家的立场明显是孤立主义者，专注于国家利益而非全球参与。

11.Many historians debate whether the country's isolationist policies contributed to its eventual downfall.

许多历史学家争论该国的孤立主义政策是否导致了其最终的衰落。

12.During the war, the government adopted an isolationist approach, avoiding alliances with foreign powers.

在战争期间，政府采取了孤立主义的方法，避免与外国势力结盟。

13.Some argue that an isolationist foreign policy can lead to economic stagnation.

有人认为，孤立主义的外交政策可能导致经济停滞。

14.The rise of isolationist sentiments in the country has sparked debates about immigration and trade.

该国孤立主义者情绪的上升引发了关于移民和贸易的辩论。

作文

In the realm of international relations, the term isolationist refers to a policy or approach whereby a country seeks to minimize its involvement in global affairs, preferring to focus on its domestic issues. This concept has been particularly relevant throughout history, as various nations have oscillated between isolationist and interventionist stances based on the political, economic, and social climates of their times. For instance, after World War I, the United States adopted a largely isolationist foreign policy, retreating from international engagements and focusing on internal development. This period saw the U.S. turning away from European conflicts, believing that involvement would lead to unnecessary entanglements and sacrifices. However, this approach was challenged when World War II erupted, forcing the nation to reconsider its stance. The consequences of isolationist policies can be profound, often leading to a lack of influence in global matters and potential vulnerabilities in times of crisis. The motivations behind adopting an isolationist policy can vary greatly. For some countries, it stems from a desire to protect national sovereignty and avoid the pitfalls of foreign alliances that could drag them into wars. For others, it may be a reflection of economic considerations, where the focus is on strengthening local industries and resources rather than engaging in costly international commitments. The Great Depression era exemplified this sentiment, as many nations turned inward to address their economic troubles, resulting in a rise in isolationist sentiments. However, there are significant drawbacks to such a stance. In a world that is increasingly interconnected through trade, technology, and communication, complete isolationist policies can lead to missed opportunities for collaboration and growth. For example, nations that choose to remain isolationist may find themselves at a disadvantage when it comes to technological advancements or global markets. Furthermore, isolationist policies can foster misunderstanding and hostility between nations, as lack of engagement often leads to a lack of trust and cooperation. The debate surrounding isolationist versus interventionist policies remains vibrant today. Some contemporary leaders advocate for a return to isolationist principles, arguing that it allows for greater focus on national interests and security. They contend that military interventions and international agreements often come at a high cost with little return. On the other hand, proponents of internationalism argue that global challenges—such as climate change, terrorism, and pandemics—require collective action and cooperation. They believe that an isolationist approach is not only outdated but also dangerous in the face of such pressing global issues. In conclusion, while the idea of being isolationist may appeal to those who prioritize national sovereignty and focus on domestic issues, it is essential to recognize the complexities of our interconnected world. The balance between engaging with global affairs and protecting national interests is delicate and requires careful consideration. As we move forward, the challenge will be to find a middle ground that allows nations to thrive both domestically and internationally, ensuring that isolationist tendencies do not hinder progress and cooperation in addressing the myriad challenges we face today.

在国际关系领域，‘isolationist’这一术语指的是一种政策或方法，即一个国家寻求尽量减少其在全球事务中的参与，更倾向于关注国内问题。这个概念在历史上尤为相关，因为各国根据当时的政治、经济和社会气候在‘isolationist’和干预主义之间摇摆。例如，在第一次世界大战后，美国采取了较为‘isolationist’的外交政策，退出了国际事务，专注于内部发展。这一时期，美国远离了欧洲冲突，认为参与将导致不必要的纠缠和牺牲。然而，当第二次世界大战爆发时，这种做法受到了挑战，迫使国家重新考虑其立场。‘isolationist’政策的后果可能是深远的，往往导致在全球事务中的影响力缺失，以及在危机时期的潜在脆弱性。 采取‘isolationist’政策的动机可能大相径庭。对一些国家而言，这源于保护国家主权的愿望，避免陷入可能将其卷入战争的外国联盟。对另一些国家而言，这可能反映了经济考虑，重点是增强本国工业和资源，而不是参与昂贵的国际承诺。大萧条时期就是这种情绪的典型例证，许多国家转向内部以解决经济困境，导致了‘isolationist’情绪的上升。 然而，这种立场也有显著的缺点。在一个通过贸易、技术和沟通日益相互联系的世界中，完全的‘isolationist’政策可能导致错失合作和增长的机会。例如，选择保持‘isolationist’的国家可能会发现自己在技术进步或全球市场中处于不利地位。此外，‘isolationist’政策可能导致国家之间的误解和敌意，因为缺乏接触往往导致缺乏信任与合作。 围绕‘isolationist’与干预主义政策的辩论至今仍然充满活力。一些当代领导人倡导回归‘isolationist’原则，认为这可以更好地关注国家利益和安全。他们主张，军事干预和国际协议通常以高昂的代价换来微薄的回报。另一方面，国际主义的支持者则认为，气候变化、恐怖主义和疫情等全球挑战需要集体行动与合作。他们认为，‘isolationist’的方式不仅过时，而且在面对如此紧迫的全球问题时也很危险。 总之，虽然成为‘isolationist’的理念可能吸引那些优先考虑国家主权和关注国内问题的人，但我们必须认识到我们这个互联世界的复杂性。在参与全球事务与保护国家利益之间找到平衡是微妙的，需要仔细考虑。随着我们向前发展，挑战将是找到一个中间立场，使各国能够在国内和国际上蓬勃发展，确保‘isolationist’倾向不会阻碍我们今天面临的各种挑战的进展与合作。