jurors
简明释义
n. [法]陪审员(juror 的复数形式)
英英释义
Jurors are individuals selected to serve on a jury, which is a group of people sworn to render a verdict in a legal case based on the evidence presented. | 陪审员是被选中在陪审团上服务的个人,陪审团是由一群宣誓根据所提供的证据作出裁决的人组成。 |
单词用法
同辈陪审团 | |
大陪审员 | |
小陪审员 | |
陪审义务 | |
陪审员的裁决 | |
陪审员的指示 | |
陪审员的审议 | |
陪审员的选择过程 |
同义词
反义词
被告 | 被告在陪审团面前提出无罪辩护。 | ||
原告 | The plaintiff presented compelling evidence to support their case. | 原告提供了有力的证据来支持他们的案件。 |
例句
1.He decided not to sit in jurors' line of sight to avoid causing bias.
他因此决定不坐在陪审员视线内的地方,以避免引起偏见。
2.The testimony would inflame the jurors, and lead them astray from the facts of the case.
这证词会惹怒陪审员们,让他们偏离案件事实。
3."[Jurors] have become so acclimated to seeing DNA evidence," he said.
“(陪审员)已经非常习惯看DNA证据。”他说。
4.The court bailiff said jurors did not wish to speak to news media until the sentencing.
法院法警说,陪审员不想在宣判之前接受新闻媒体采访。
5.In most jurisdictions, twelve jurors and two alternates are chosen.
在大多数审判中,12名陪审员和2名替补人员会被选出。
6.He raised questions meant to plant seeds of doubts in the minds of jurors.
他提出了一些问题,意欲引起陪审员的疑心。
7.The judge instructed the jurors 陪审员 to remain impartial during the trial.
法官指示
8.After several days of deliberation, the jurors 陪审员 reached a unanimous verdict.
经过几天的审议,陪审员达成了一致的裁决。
9.The defense attorney presented evidence to convince the jurors 陪审员 of his client's innocence.
辩护律师提供证据以说服陪审员相信他的客户是无辜的。
10.During the trial, the jurors 陪审员 took extensive notes to help them remember key details.
在审判期间,陪审员做了大量笔记,以帮助他们记住关键细节。
11.The jurors 陪审员 were instructed to disregard any media coverage of the case.
法官指示陪审员忽视任何关于此案的媒体报道。
作文
The role of jurors in the judicial system is crucial for ensuring a fair trial. A juror is a member of a jury, which is a group of individuals selected to hear evidence in a court case and make a decision based on that evidence. The concept of having jurors dates back to ancient times, where citizens were called upon to participate in the legal process. In modern society, the presence of jurors serves as a fundamental aspect of the democratic process, providing a check on the power of the state and ensuring that ordinary people have a voice in the legal proceedings that affect their lives. When a person is accused of a crime, it is the responsibility of the jurors to examine the facts presented during the trial. They listen to testimonies from witnesses, review evidence, and ultimately decide whether the accused is guilty or not guilty. This process is vital because it allows for a collective judgment rather than a decision made by a single judge. The idea is that a group of peers can better reflect the community's standards and values when determining the outcome of a case. The selection of jurors is conducted through a process called voir dire, where potential jurors are questioned to ensure they can be impartial. It is essential that jurors do not have any preconceived notions about the case or personal biases that could affect their judgment. Once selected, jurors are sworn in and must commit to upholding their duty with integrity. In many countries, serving as a juror is considered a civic duty. It is an opportunity for citizens to participate directly in the justice system and contribute to the rule of law. However, being a juror can also be a challenging experience. Jurors may be exposed to distressing details about crimes, and they must navigate the complexities of legal arguments and evidence. Despite these challenges, the role of jurors is essential for maintaining public confidence in the judicial system. The deliberation process is perhaps one of the most critical aspects of a juror's responsibilities. After all evidence has been presented, the jurors retreat to discuss the case among themselves. This stage requires open communication, critical thinking, and collaboration. Each juror brings their perspectives and insights, which can lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the case. It is during this deliberation that jurors must work together to reach a unanimous verdict in criminal cases, reflecting the principle that a defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty. In conclusion, jurors play an indispensable role in the judicial system. Their participation ensures that trials are fair and just, allowing for the community's voice to be heard in legal matters. Serving as a juror is both a privilege and a responsibility, highlighting the importance of civic engagement in upholding democracy and the rule of law. As society continues to evolve, the role of jurors will remain a cornerstone of the legal process, embodying the principles of justice and equality before the law.
陪审团成员在司法系统中的角色对确保公正审判至关重要。陪审员是陪审团的成员,陪审团是由选定的个人组成的小组,负责听取法庭案件中的证据并根据这些证据作出决定。拥有陪审员的概念可以追溯到古代,当时公民被召集参与法律程序。在现代社会中,陪审员的存在作为民主过程的基本方面,提供了对国家权力的制衡,并确保普通人在影响其生活的法律程序中拥有发言权。 当一个人被控犯罪时,陪审员有责任审查在审判中提出的事实。他们听取证人证词,审查证据,并最终决定被告是否有罪或无罪。这个过程至关重要,因为它允许集体判断,而不是由单一法官作出的决定。其理念是,一群同龄人能够更好地反映社区的标准和价值观,从而决定案件的结果。 陪审员的选择通过称为voir dire的过程进行,潜在的陪审员会被问及,以确保他们能够保持公正。确保陪审员对案件没有任何先入为主的看法或可能影响其判断的个人偏见是至关重要的。一旦选定,陪审员就会宣誓,并必须承诺以诚信履行职责。 在许多国家,担任陪审员被视为公民义务。这是公民直接参与司法系统并为法治做出贡献的机会。然而,成为陪审员也可能是一个具有挑战性的经历。陪审员可能会接触到关于犯罪的令人痛心的细节,他们必须应对法律论点和证据的复杂性。尽管面临这些挑战,陪审员的角色对于维护公众对司法系统的信任至关重要。 审议过程可能是陪审员职责中最关键的方面。在所有证据提交后,陪审员会退回去讨论案件。这个阶段需要开放的沟通、批判性思维和合作。每位陪审员都带来了自己的视角和见解,这可以导致对案件更全面的理解。正是在这一审议过程中,陪审员必须共同努力,在刑事案件中达成一致的裁决,反映出被告在未被证明有罪之前被假定为无罪的原则。 总之,陪审员在司法系统中发挥着不可或缺的作用。他们的参与确保审判公正合理,使社区的声音在法律事务中得到倾听。担任陪审员既是一种特权,也是一种责任,突显了公民参与在维护民主和法治中的重要性。随着社会的不断发展,陪审员的角色将继续作为法律程序的基石,体现正义和平等原则。
文章标题:jurors的意思是什么
文章链接:https://www.liuxue886.cn/danci/400981.html
本站文章均为原创,未经授权请勿用于任何商业用途
发表评论