juryman

简明释义

英[ˈdʒʊərimən]美[ˈdʒʊrimən]

n. 陪审员

复 数 j u r y m e n

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.An absentee juryman or one who attends unfit as a result of alcohol or other drugs is liable to summary proceedings in a magistrates' court as well as to committal for contempt.

陪审员如果无故缺席或者出庭时因醉酒或吸毒不适合参加庭审，将会导致在治安法庭受到简易罪审判，也可以作为藐视法庭罪转送审判。

2.An absentee juryman or one who attends unfit as a result of alcohol or other drugs is liable to summary proceedings in a magistrates' court as well as to committal for contempt.

陪审员如果无故缺席或者出庭时因醉酒或吸毒不适合参加庭审，将会导致在治安法庭受到简易罪审判，也可以作为藐视法庭罪转送审判。

3.A life-thirsting, cannibal looking, bloody-minded juryman, the Jacques Three of St. Antoine.

那是圣安托万区的杰克三号，一个嗜杀成性、食人生番式的、满怀血腥的陪审员。

4.The court summoned a panel of twelve jurymen 陪审员 to decide the verdict.

法庭召集了十二名陪审员来决定裁决。

5.Each juryman 陪审员 was instructed to remain impartial during the trial.

每位陪审员在审判期间都被指示保持公正。

6.The defense attorney argued that the juryman 陪审员 had a bias against his client.

辩护律师辩称该陪审员对他的客户有偏见。

7.After several days of deliberation, the jurymen 陪审员们 reached a unanimous decision.

经过几天的审议，陪审员们达成了一致决定。

8.The judge reminded the juryman 陪审员 to base their decision solely on the evidence presented.

法官提醒陪审员仅根据提出的证据做出决定。

作文

In the realm of justice, the role of a juryman (陪审员) is both vital and intriguing. A juryman is a member of a jury, which is a group of individuals sworn to deliver a verdict in a legal case, typically in a court of law. The concept of a jury can be traced back to ancient times, but it has evolved significantly over centuries. Today, juries are an essential component of many legal systems, particularly in common law countries like the United States and the United Kingdom. The responsibilities of a juryman are profound. They must listen attentively to the evidence presented during a trial, assess the credibility of witnesses, and ultimately decide on the guilt or innocence of the defendant. This process requires not only critical thinking and analytical skills but also a deep sense of fairness and impartiality. A good juryman understands that their decision can have life-altering consequences for the individuals involved, making their role one of immense responsibility. One of the most significant aspects of being a juryman is the requirement for impartiality. Jurors must set aside their personal biases and preconceived notions to evaluate the case based solely on the evidence provided in court. This can be particularly challenging in high-profile cases where public opinion may be swayed by media coverage. A juryman must remain objective, focusing solely on the facts presented, and resist any external influences that could compromise their judgment. Moreover, the selection process for a juryman is designed to ensure a diverse and representative jury pool. Potential jurors are often chosen randomly from voter registration lists or other public records. During the selection process, attorneys for both sides have the opportunity to question potential jurors to identify any biases that might affect their ability to serve impartially. This process, known as voir dire, is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the jury system. The deliberation phase is perhaps the most critical moment for a juryman. After hearing the case, jurors retreat to discuss the evidence and reach a unanimous or majority decision, depending on the jurisdiction. During deliberation, a juryman must communicate effectively with fellow jurors, share insights, and listen to differing viewpoints. This collaborative effort is essential in ensuring that all angles of the case are considered before arriving at a verdict. In conclusion, the role of a juryman (陪审员) is fundamental to the judicial process. Their commitment to fairness, impartiality, and thorough deliberation ensures that justice is served. As society evolves, the responsibilities and challenges faced by jurymen will continue to adapt, reflecting the changing landscape of law and order. Understanding the significance of a juryman helps us appreciate the complexities of the legal system and the importance of civic duty in upholding justice for all.

在司法领域，juryman（陪审员）的角色既重要又引人入胜。juryman是陪审团的成员，陪审团是一群被宣誓在法律案件中作出裁决的个人，通常是在法庭上。陪审团的概念可以追溯到古代，但几个世纪以来，它已经显著演变。如今，陪审团是许多法律系统的基本组成部分，特别是在美国和英国等普通法国家。 juryman的责任重大。他们必须认真听取在审判期间提出的证据，评估证人的可信度，并最终决定被告的有罪或无罪。这一过程不仅需要批判性思维和分析能力，还需要深刻的公平感和公正性。一名优秀的juryman明白，他们的决定可能对相关个人产生改变生活的后果，这使得他们的角色具有巨大的责任感。 作为juryman最重要的方面之一是公正性的要求。陪审员必须抛开个人偏见和先入为主的观念，单纯根据法庭提供的证据来评估案件。这在高调案件中尤其具有挑战性，因为公众舆论可能会受到媒体报道的影响。juryman必须保持客观，专注于呈现的事实，抵制任何可能损害其判断的外部影响。 此外，juryman的选拔过程旨在确保多样化和具有代表性的陪审团池。潜在陪审员通常是从选民登记名单或其他公共记录中随机选择的。在选拔过程中，双方的律师有机会质询潜在陪审员，以识别可能影响他们公正服务能力的任何偏见。这一过程称为voir dire，对于维护陪审团制度的完整性至关重要。 审议阶段可能是juryman最关键的时刻。在听取案件后，陪审员退回讨论证据，并根据管辖权达成一致或多数决定。在审议期间，juryman必须与其他陪审员有效沟通，分享见解，并倾听不同的观点。这种协作努力对于确保在得出裁决之前考虑案件的所有角度至关重要。 总之，juryman（陪审员）的角色对司法过程至关重要。他们对公平、公正和彻底审议的承诺确保了正义的实现。随着社会的发展，juryman所面临的责任和挑战将继续适应，反映法律和秩序不断变化的格局。理解juryman的重要性有助于我们欣赏法律系统的复杂性以及公民责任在维护正义中的重要性。