justiciable

简明释义

英[dʒʌˈstɪʃəb(ə)l]美[dʒʌsˈtɪʃɪəbl]

adj. 可在法庭裁决的；应受法院审判的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The right to health is justiciable in some degree analyzing from the three angles of its nature, the limited resource and the separation of powers.

从权利性质、资源限制及分权原则三个方面来看，健康权在一定层面上是可诉的。

2.The right to health is justiciable in some degree analyzing from the three angles of its nature, the limited resource and the separation of powers.

从权利性质、资源限制及分权原则三个方面来看，健康权在一定层面上是可诉的。

3.My friend says that offence is not justiciable in a federal court.

我的朋友说那种违法行为不受联邦法院之管辖。

4.That offence is not justiciable in a federal court.

那种过错不在联邦法院受理范围内。

5.The law must ensure that all human rights violations are justiciable.

法律必须确保所有人权侵犯行为都是可司法审理的。

6.In many jurisdictions, environmental issues are increasingly being recognized as justiciable matters.

在许多法域中，环境问题越来越被视为可司法审理的事项。

7.The court ruled that the treaty obligations were justiciable in domestic law.

法院裁定条约义务在国内法中是可司法审理的。

8.Some argue that economic rights should also be justiciable.

有人认为经济权利也应该是可司法审理的。

9.The concept of justiciable rights has evolved over the years.

可司法审理的权利的概念多年来一直在发展。

作文

In the realm of law and governance, the term justiciable plays a pivotal role in determining what matters can be adjudicated by courts. Essentially, justiciable refers to issues or disputes that are capable of being examined and resolved through legal proceedings. This concept is fundamental in ensuring that individuals have access to justice and that their rights can be enforced through the judicial system. Historically, the scope of justiciable matters has evolved significantly. In earlier legal systems, many issues were deemed non-justiciable, often due to the belief that certain matters were best left to political or administrative bodies rather than the judiciary. For instance, questions regarding foreign policy or national security were traditionally viewed as outside the purview of the courts. However, as societies have progressed and the rule of law has gained prominence, there has been a shift towards recognizing a wider range of issues as justiciable. One significant area where the concept of justiciable is particularly relevant is in the protection of human rights. Courts around the world have increasingly taken on cases that involve allegations of human rights violations, asserting that these matters are indeed justiciable. This shift reflects a growing consensus that individuals should have the right to seek legal redress when their fundamental rights are infringed upon, regardless of the nature of the violation. Moreover, the definition of justiciable also extends to the ability of courts to provide remedies for breaches of law. For example, if a government action is challenged in court, the judiciary must determine whether the issue at hand is justiciable, meaning it can be legally addressed and remedied. This involves assessing whether there is sufficient legal framework and jurisdiction for the court to intervene. The implications of something being justiciable are profound. When an issue is classified as justiciable, it opens the door for individuals to hold authorities accountable and seek justice through the legal system. Conversely, if an issue is deemed non-justiciable, it may leave individuals without recourse, potentially leading to abuses of power and impunity. In conclusion, the concept of justiciable is essential in the context of law and human rights. It not only defines the limits of judicial intervention but also underscores the importance of access to justice. As legal systems continue to evolve, the understanding and application of justiciable matters will undoubtedly play a crucial role in shaping the relationship between citizens and the state. The ongoing dialogue about what constitutes justiciable issues reflects broader societal values and the commitment to upholding the rule of law and protecting individual rights. Ultimately, the recognition of diverse matters as justiciable enhances the integrity of the legal system and reinforces the principle that justice should be accessible to all, ensuring that every individual has the opportunity to seek resolution through the courts when faced with grievances.

在法律和治理的领域中，术语justiciable在确定哪些事项可以由法院裁决方面发挥着关键作用。基本上，justiciable指的是能够通过法律程序进行审查和解决的问题或争端。这个概念对于确保个人获得正义以及他们的权利能够通过司法系统得到执行至关重要。 历史上，justiciable事项的范围已经发生了显著变化。在早期的法律系统中，许多问题被认为是非justiciable的，通常是因为人们认为某些事项最好由政治或行政机构处理，而不是由司法机构处理。例如，关于外交政策或国家安全的问题传统上被视为法院的管辖范围之外。然而，随着社会的发展和法治的日益重要，越来越多的问题被认识到是justiciable的。 一个与justiciable概念特别相关的重要领域是人权保护。世界各地的法院越来越多地接受涉及人权侵犯指控的案件，主张这些问题确实是justiciable的。这一转变反映了一个日益广泛的共识，即个人在基本权利受到侵犯时应有权寻求法律救济，无论侵犯的性质如何。 此外，justiciable的定义还扩展到法院提供法律救济的能力。例如，如果政府行为在法庭上受到挑战，司法机关必须确定所涉及的问题是否是justiciable的，这意味着它可以通过法律途径进行处理和补救。这涉及评估法院是否有足够的法律框架和管辖权进行干预。 某个问题被归类为justiciable的影响深远。当一个问题被认定为justiciable时，就为个人追究当局的责任并通过法律系统寻求正义打开了大门。相反，如果一个问题被认为是非justiciable的，可能会使个人没有救济途径，从而导致权力滥用和不受惩罚的情况。 总之，justiciable的概念在法律和人权的背景下至关重要。它不仅定义了司法干预的界限，还强调了获得正义的重要性。随着法律系统的不断发展，对justiciable事项的理解和应用无疑将在塑造公民与国家之间的关系中发挥关键作用。关于什么构成justiciable问题的持续对话反映了更广泛的社会价值观以及对维护法治和保护个人权利的承诺。 最终，将多样化事项认定为justiciable增强了法律系统的完整性，并强化了正义应对所有人可及的原则，确保每个人在面临不满时都有机会通过法院寻求解决。