justificative

简明释义

英[ˌdʒʌstɪfɪˈkeɪtɪv]美[ˌdʒʌstɪfɪˈkeɪtɪv]

adj. 认为正当的；起辩护作用的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The victim's promise in a narrow sense only means the consent of victim which exists as a justificative active in criminal law.

狭义的被害人的承诺则仅指作为刑法中的正当化行为而存在的被害人的同意。

2.The victim's promise in a narrow sense only means the consent of victim which exists as a justificative active in criminal law.

狭义的被害人的承诺则仅指作为刑法中的正当化行为而存在的被害人的同意。

3.The lawyer provided a justificative document to support her client's case.

律师提供了一份证明性的文件来支持她客户的案件。

4.In the meeting, he presented several justificative reports to justify the budget increase.

在会议上，他提出了几份证明性的报告以证明预算增加的合理性。

5.The committee required a justificative explanation for the decision made.

委员会要求对所做决定提供一份证明性的解释。

6.Her research included justificative data that reinforced her conclusions.

她的研究包含了证明性的数据，增强了她的结论。

7.The company issued a justificative statement regarding the changes in policy.

公司发布了一份关于政策变更的证明性声明。

作文

In today's world, the concept of justification plays a crucial role in various fields, including law, ethics, and everyday decision-making. The term justificative refers to the process or reasoning that provides support or rationale for a particular action, belief, or decision. Understanding this concept is essential for anyone who seeks to engage in meaningful discourse or make informed choices. To illustrate the importance of justificative reasoning, consider the field of law. Lawyers often present justificative arguments to defend their clients. These arguments are not merely based on personal beliefs or opinions; they rely on evidence, precedents, and legal principles. For instance, a defense attorney might argue that a client's actions were justified under self-defense laws. Here, the justificative nature of the argument lies in the legal framework that supports the claim, emphasizing the need for a solid foundation in reasoning. Similarly, in ethical discussions, the justificative aspect becomes even more pronounced. Ethical dilemmas often require individuals to weigh their actions against moral principles. For example, when discussing whether to lie to protect someone's feelings, one must consider the justificative reasons behind each choice. Is honesty always the best policy, or can a lie be justified in certain contexts? This kind of analysis is crucial for arriving at a well-rounded perspective on ethical issues. Moreover, in our daily lives, we constantly engage in justificative reasoning, whether we realize it or not. When making decisions about spending money, pursuing a career, or choosing friends, we often find ourselves justifying our choices to ourselves and others. For example, someone might justify buying an expensive gadget by arguing that it will improve their productivity. Here, the justificative reasoning involves weighing the benefits against the costs, demonstrating how we rationalize our actions. In academic writing, the use of justificative arguments is vital for presenting a compelling case. Scholars must provide evidence and reasoning to support their claims, ensuring that their conclusions are not based solely on personal opinion. A well-structured argument will include a clear thesis statement followed by justificative evidence, such as data, research findings, or theoretical frameworks. This approach not only strengthens the argument but also enhances the credibility of the writer. In conclusion, the concept of justificative reasoning is integral to various aspects of life, from legal practices to ethical considerations and everyday decision-making. By understanding and applying justificative principles, individuals can engage in more thoughtful discussions, make better choices, and present stronger arguments. Ultimately, the ability to justify our actions and beliefs is a fundamental skill that enriches our interactions and enhances our understanding of the world around us.

在当今世界，正当性的概念在法律、伦理和日常决策等多个领域中发挥着至关重要的作用。术语justificative指的是为特定行为、信念或决策提供支持或理由的过程或推理。理解这一概念对于任何希望参与有意义的讨论或做出明智选择的人来说都是至关重要的。 为了说明justificative推理的重要性，可以考虑法律领域。律师经常提出justificative论点来为客户辩护。这些论点不仅仅基于个人信念或意见；它们依赖于证据、先例和法律原则。例如，辩护律师可能会辩称，客户的行为在自卫法下是合理的。在这里，论点的justificative性质在于支持该主张的法律框架，强调了推理基础的重要性。 同样，在伦理讨论中，justificative方面变得更加明显。伦理困境通常要求个人权衡其行为与道德原则之间的关系。例如，当讨论是否撒谎以保护某人的感情时，人们必须考虑每个选择背后的justificative理由。诚实是否总是最佳政策，或者在某些情况下谎言是否可以被证明是合理的？这种分析对于全面理解伦理问题至关重要。 此外，在我们的日常生活中，无论我们是否意识到，我们都不断参与justificative推理。当做出关于花钱、追求职业或选择朋友的决定时，我们经常发现自己在向自己和他人辩解。例如，有人可能会通过论证购买昂贵的小工具将提高他们的生产力来为自己的消费辩护。在这里，justificative推理涉及权衡收益与成本，展示了我们如何合理化自己的行为。 在学术写作中，使用justificative论点对于提出有说服力的案例至关重要。学者们必须提供证据和推理来支持他们的主张，确保他们的结论不仅仅基于个人意见。一个结构良好的论证将包括一个清晰的论点陈述，随后是justificative证据，例如数据、研究结果或理论框架。这种方法不仅增强了论证的力度，还提高了作者的可信度。 总之，justificative推理的概念在生活的各个方面都是不可或缺的，从法律实践到伦理考虑，再到日常决策。通过理解和应用justificative原则，个人可以参与更深思熟虑的讨论，做出更好的选择，并提出更强有力的论点。最终，能够为我们的行为和信念辩护是一项基本技能，它丰富了我们的互动并增强了我们对周围世界的理解。