kludge

简明释义

英[kluːdʒ;klʌdʒ]美[kluːdʒˌklʌdʒ]

n. 杂牌电脑，组装机（等于 kluge）

复 数 k l u d g e s

第 三 人 称 单 数 k l u d g e s

现 在 分 词 k l u d g i n g

过 去 式 k l u d g e d

过 去 分 词 k l u d g e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.And life, in his opinion, is a kludge.

在他看来生命也是一种组装的系统。

2.As an engineer, he can recognise a kludge when he sees one.

作为一名工程师，他一眼就能识别出那些“蹩脚的组装”。

3.Isn't this just another kludge to try and emulate real desktop GUI application capabilities?

这是不是一种临时搭配，以尝试和模拟真正的桌面GUI应用程序功能？

4.Input kludge: Failing to specify and implement handling of possibly invalid input.

输入问题(Inputkludge)：无法指出和实现对不正确的输入的处理。

5.And life, inh is opinion, is a kludge.

而在他看来，生命本身就不完善。

6.If the UI changes, the kludge can be redone without affecting a single script.

而如果用户界面发生改变，则可以在不影响单个脚本的情况下重建组装件。

7.This hides each kludge inside a function.

这可以把每个组装件隐藏到一个函数中。

8.To use a feature, the programmer calls the feature, without thinking about the kludge .

如果要使用一个特性，程序员就调用该特性，而不必考虑组装件的存在。

9.The software update was a complete kludge, fixing one issue while creating several new problems.

这个软件更新完全是一个临时凑合的解决方案，修复了一个问题，却引发了几个新问题。

10.Instead of rewriting the code, the developer opted for a kludge to meet the deadline.

开发者选择了一个临时凑合的解决方案以满足截止日期，而不是重写代码。

11.The website's backend is a kludge of outdated scripts and poorly integrated APIs.

该网站的后端是一个由过时脚本和糟糕集成的API组成的临时凑合的解决方案。

12.His attempt to fix the broken printer resulted in a kludge that barely worked.

他修理坏掉的打印机的尝试导致了一个勉强可用的临时凑合的解决方案。

13.The team created a kludge to bypass the security issues in the application temporarily.

团队创建了一个临时凑合的解决方案来暂时绕过应用程序中的安全问题。

作文

In the world of technology and engineering, the term kludge refers to a solution that is inelegant or hastily assembled, often cobbled together from various components that were not originally intended to work together. This term is particularly relevant in software development, where programmers sometimes create quick fixes that may not be the most efficient or maintainable solutions. A kludge can be seen as a temporary patch rather than a well-thought-out design, which can lead to complications down the line. For instance, consider a scenario in which a software team is under pressure to meet a deadline. They might choose to implement a kludge to ensure that a feature is delivered on time, even if it means sacrificing code quality. This could involve using outdated libraries, writing convoluted code, or integrating multiple systems that were not designed to work together seamlessly. While this approach might solve the immediate problem, it can create additional challenges in the future, such as increased technical debt and difficulties in maintenance. The implications of relying on kludges in software development are significant. As projects evolve and new features are added, the original kludge can become a tangled web of dependencies and issues. Developers may find themselves spending more time debugging and refactoring code than they would have if they had taken the time to implement a proper solution from the outset. This can lead to frustration among team members and stakeholders, who may not understand why a simple fix has turned into a complex problem. Moreover, the culture of accepting kludges can permeate an organization, leading to a mindset where quick fixes are seen as acceptable. This can stifle innovation and discourage developers from striving for excellence in their work. Instead of pushing for clean, efficient code, teams may settle for the easiest path, resulting in a less robust product. On the other hand, there are instances where a kludge might be the best option available at the moment. In situations where time is of the essence, and a full redesign is not feasible, a kludge can provide a stopgap solution that allows a product to function temporarily. However, it is crucial for teams to recognize when they are resorting to a kludge and to plan for future improvements. In conclusion, while kludges can serve a purpose in the short term, relying on them can lead to long-term complications and inefficiencies. It is essential for developers and organizations to strive for better solutions and to understand the potential pitfalls of quick fixes. By prioritizing quality and maintainability, teams can create more sustainable products that will stand the test of time. Ultimately, avoiding kludges in favor of well-structured solutions can enhance productivity, improve team morale, and lead to greater success in the competitive landscape of technology development.

在技术和工程领域，术语kludge指的是一种不优雅或匆忙组装的解决方案，通常是由各种原本不打算一起工作的组件拼凑而成。这个术语在软件开发中尤其相关，因为程序员有时会创建快速修复，这些修复可能不是最高效或最易维护的解决方案。kludge可以被视为临时补丁，而不是经过深思熟虑的设计，这可能导致未来的复杂性。 例如，考虑一个软件团队面临截止日期的场景。他们可能选择实施一个kludge以确保按时交付某个功能，即使这意味着牺牲代码质量。这可能涉及使用过时的库、编写复杂的代码，或者集成多个原本不打算无缝协作的系统。虽然这种方法可能解决了眼前的问题，但它可能在未来带来额外的挑战，例如增加技术债务和维护困难。 在软件开发中依赖kludge的影响是显著的。随着项目的发展和新特性的添加，原始的kludge可能变成一个纠缠的依赖关系和问题的网络。开发人员可能发现自己花费更多时间调试和重构代码，而不是如果他们从一开始就花时间实现一个合适的解决方案。这可能导致团队成员和利益相关者之间的挫败感，他们可能不理解为什么一个简单的修复变成了一个复杂的问题。 此外，接受kludge的文化可能渗透到一个组织中，导致一种心态，即快速修复被视为可以接受的。这可能抑制创新，并使开发人员不愿意追求卓越的工作。团队可能会满足于最简单的路径，导致产品的稳健性下降。 另一方面，在某些情况下，kludge可能是当时最佳的选择。在时间至关重要且全面重新设计不可行的情况下，kludge可以提供一个临时的解决方案，使产品能够暂时运行。然而，团队必须认识到何时求助于kludge，并计划未来的改进。 总之，虽然kludge在短期内可以发挥作用，但依赖它们可能导致长期的复杂性和低效率。开发人员和组织必须努力寻求更好的解决方案，并了解快速修复的潜在陷阱。通过优先考虑质量和可维护性，团队可以创建更可持续的产品，这些产品将经受住时间的考验。最终，避免kludge而选择结构良好的解决方案可以提高生产力、改善团队士气，并在竞争激烈的技术开发领域取得更大的成功。