leviathan

简明释义

英[ləˈvaɪəθən]美[ləˈvaɪəθən]

n. 海中怪兽；庞然大物；巨轮

复 数 l e v i a t h a n s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Leviathan appears in the form of a huge sea serpent with seven heads and is both male and female.

利维坦出现的形式是一个庞大的海蛇有七头，是男用和女用。

2.Perhaps the worst part of these policies is that they are inconceivable without a leviathan state, exactly as Keynes said.

没有一个如凯恩斯所言的利维坦国家，这些政策都无法想象，也许这才是最糟的部分。

3.In the future age Gabriel would hunt and slay Leviathan.

在未来年龄加布里埃尔将追捕和杀死利维坦。

4.Democracy survived the Civil War and the developing industrial leviathan and struggled on into the twentieth century.

民主经历了内战和发展着的庞大工业体系而幸存下来并挣扎进入20世纪。

5.The fact that Mr Malick's Leviathan is a beached plesiosaur will draw fire from anti-Darwinians.

实际上马力克导演的海怪是一个被拖上岸的蛇颈龙，这将会招致反达尔文主义者的激烈抨击。

6.A multitude so united is called a commonwealth. This "Leviathan" is a mortal God.

如此结合起来的群众称作国家。这个“利维坦”是一个凡间的神。

7.The ancient mariner spoke of a great sea monster, a leviathan, that terrorized sailors.

古老的水手谈到了一个伟大的海怪，一个利维坦，它让水手们感到恐惧。

8.In political discussions, some refer to the government as a leviathan due to its immense power.

在政治讨论中，有人称政府为利维坦，因为它拥有巨大的权力。

9.The corporation has grown into a leviathan in the tech industry, dominating the market.

这家公司在科技行业中成长为一个利维坦，主导着市场。

10.The novel depicts a world where a leviathan of bureaucracy stifles creativity.

这部小说描绘了一个世界，在那里，一个利维坦般的官僚体系扼杀了创造力。

11.Some environmentalists argue that the leviathan of climate change must be addressed immediately.

一些环保主义者认为，气候变化的利维坦必须立即得到解决。

作文

In the realm of literature and philosophy, the term leviathan holds significant weight. Originally derived from the Hebrew Bible, where it refers to a monstrous sea creature, the word has evolved to embody a variety of meanings in contemporary discourse. Most notably, it is often used to describe a powerful state or government that wields immense authority over its citizens. This interpretation was famously articulated by Thomas Hobbes in his seminal work, 'Leviathan,' published in 1651. In this text, Hobbes argues that in order to escape the chaos of a natural state—characterized by constant fear and conflict—individuals must collectively surrender their rights to a sovereign authority, which he metaphorically refers to as the leviathan. The concept of the leviathan serves as a critical lens through which we can examine the balance between individual freedom and governmental power. On one hand, a strong government can provide stability, security, and order, essential for the functioning of society. Without such an entity, Hobbes posits that life would be 'solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.' The leviathan thus symbolizes the collective agreement of individuals to form a social contract, relinquishing certain freedoms in exchange for peace and protection. However, the leviathan also raises important questions about the limits of governmental power. When does the authority of the state become oppressive? How do we ensure that the leviathan does not overreach its bounds and infringe upon the very liberties it was created to protect? These questions are particularly relevant in today's world, where many governments have expanded their reach into the personal lives of citizens under the guise of security and order. In modern political discourse, the term leviathan can also refer to large corporations or institutions that dominate their respective industries. Just as Hobbes warned against the dangers of an all-powerful state, critics today caution against the influence of massive corporations that can manipulate markets, sway public opinion, and even shape government policy. This contemporary interpretation of the leviathan highlights the need for checks and balances, whether in the form of regulatory agencies, antitrust laws, or public advocacy. Furthermore, the leviathan can symbolize the challenges faced by individuals in a rapidly changing world. As technology advances and globalization intensifies, people often feel overwhelmed by forces beyond their control. The leviathan, in this sense, represents the complexities of modern life, where individuals must navigate intricate systems of governance, economy, and culture. It urges us to consider how we can reclaim agency in a world that often feels dominated by larger entities. Ultimately, understanding the multifaceted nature of the leviathan allows for a deeper appreciation of the dynamics between authority and individual autonomy. Whether viewed through the lens of political theory, corporate power, or societal change, the leviathan remains a pertinent symbol of the struggle for balance in human affairs. As we continue to grapple with these issues, it is crucial to remember the lessons imparted by Hobbes and others: that while the leviathan can offer protection and order, vigilance is necessary to prevent it from becoming a source of oppression and tyranny.

在文学和哲学的领域中，术语leviathan具有重要的意义。这个词最初源于希伯来圣经，指的是一种巨大的海洋生物，但随着时间的推移，它在当代话语中演变出了多种含义。最显著的是，它常常用来描述一个对其公民拥有巨大权力的强大国家或政府。这一解释在托马斯·霍布斯的开创性著作《利维坦》中得到了明确阐述，该书于1651年出版。在这本书中，霍布斯认为，为了逃避自然状态下的混乱——这种状态以持续的恐惧和冲突为特征，个体必须集体放弃他们的权利，交给一个主权权威，他比喻性地称之为leviathan。 leviathan的概念作为一个关键视角，使我们能够审视个人自由与政府权力之间的平衡。一方面，强大的政府可以提供稳定、安全和秩序，这是社会运作所必需的。霍布斯认为，如果没有这样的实体，生活将是“孤独、贫穷、肮脏、残酷且短暂的”。因此，leviathan象征着个体形成社会契约的集体同意，放弃某些自由以换取和平与保护。 然而，leviathan也提出了关于政府权力限度的重要问题。什么情况下国家的权威变得压迫？我们如何确保leviathan不会超越其界限，侵犯其创建的目的——保护自由？这些问题在当今世界尤为相关，许多政府在安全和秩序的名义下扩大了对公民个人生活的干预。 在现代政治话语中，术语leviathan也可以指那些主导各自行业的大型公司或机构。正如霍布斯警告人们要提防全能国家的危险，今天的批评者也警告大型企业可能操纵市场、影响公众舆论，甚至塑造政府政策。这一当代解读的leviathan突显了对制衡机制的需求，无论是通过监管机构、反垄断法还是公共倡导。 此外，leviathan还可以象征个人在快速变化的世界中面临的挑战。随着技术进步和全球化加剧，人们常常感到被超出控制的力量所压倒。在这个意义上，leviathan代表了现代生活的复杂性，个体必须在治理、经济和文化的复杂系统中导航。它促使我们思考如何在一个常常感觉被更大实体主宰的世界中重新获得自主权。 最终，理解leviathan的多面性使我们能够更深刻地欣赏权威与个人自主之间的动态关系。无论是通过政治理论、企业权力还是社会变革的视角，leviathan仍然是人类事务中追求平衡斗争的相关象征。当我们继续应对这些问题时，至关重要的是要记住霍布斯和其他人传达的教训：虽然leviathan可以提供保护和秩序，但保持警惕是必要的，以防它成为压迫和暴政的源泉。