libeller

简明释义

英[ˈlaɪbələ(r)]美[ˈlaɪbələr]

n. 诽谤者

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Surface: But-Madam-let me caution you to place no more confidence in our friend Snake the Libeller.

索菲斯：但是，女士，我要提醒您一下，不要再把信心放在诽谤者、我们的朋友施奈克身上了。

2.Surface: But-Madam-let me caution you to place no more confidence in our friend Snake the Libeller.

索菲斯：但是，女士，我要提醒您一下，不要再把信心放在诽谤者、我们的朋友施奈克身上了。

3.The newspaper was sued by a former employee for labeling him as a thief, calling the editor a libeller.

这家报纸因将一名前员工称为小偷而被起诉，前员工称编辑是诽谤者。

4.In court, the defendant argued that he was not a libeller because his statements were based on facts.

在法庭上，被告辩称他不是诽谤者，因为他的陈述是基于事实的。

5.The author faced backlash for being labeled a libeller after publishing a controversial book.

这位作者因出版一本有争议的书而被贴上诽谤者的标签，面临强烈反对。

6.If you make false accusations about someone, you could be considered a libeller.

如果你对某人做出虚假的指控，你可能会被视为诽谤者。

7.The politician threatened to sue anyone who acted as a libeller against his character.

这位政治家威胁要起诉任何对他的品格进行诽谤的人。

作文

In today's digital age, the power of words is more significant than ever. With just a few clicks, anyone can share their thoughts and opinions with a global audience. However, this freedom of expression comes with its own set of challenges, particularly when it comes to the concept of defamation. One term that often arises in discussions about defamation is libeller, which refers to a person who makes false statements about someone else in written form, damaging that person's reputation. Understanding the implications of being labeled a libeller is crucial for anyone engaging in public discourse. To illustrate the importance of this term, consider the case of a small business owner who has worked tirelessly to build their brand. Imagine that a disgruntled former employee decides to write a negative review online, claiming that the owner engages in unethical practices. If this review contains false information, the former employee could be considered a libeller. The consequences of such actions can be devastating for the business owner, who may suffer financial losses and damage to their reputation. The legal ramifications of being a libeller can also be severe. In many jurisdictions, individuals who make defamatory statements can be sued for damages. This means that the person making the false claims could face legal action, resulting in costly court fees and potential compensation payments to the victim. Thus, the label of libeller carries with it not only moral implications but also significant legal risks. Furthermore, the rise of social media has exacerbated the issue of defamation. With platforms like Twitter and Facebook, individuals can quickly spread information—true or false—across vast networks. The rapid dissemination of potentially harmful statements makes it easier for someone to be labeled a libeller. For example, a tweet containing false accusations can go viral within minutes, leading to public outrage and backlash against the accused, even before they have a chance to defend themselves. In light of these challenges, it is essential for individuals to think critically about the information they share online. Before posting a review or comment about someone, one should consider whether the information is factual and whether it could be interpreted as defamatory. Engaging in responsible communication helps to prevent becoming a libeller and protects the integrity of public discourse. Education plays a vital role in combating the issue of defamation and understanding the term libeller. Schools and community organizations should provide resources on media literacy, teaching individuals how to discern between credible information and misleading claims. By fostering an environment of critical thinking, society can reduce the incidence of defamation and promote healthier discussions. In conclusion, the term libeller encapsulates a serious issue in our modern world. As we navigate the complexities of digital communication, it is imperative to be aware of the potential consequences of our words. By being mindful of the information we share and seeking to understand the implications of defamation, we can contribute to a more respectful and truthful dialogue in our communities. Ultimately, we must remember that while everyone has the right to express their opinions, it is crucial to do so responsibly to avoid the pitfalls of becoming a libeller and harming others in the process.

在当今数字时代，文字的力量比以往任何时候都更为重要。只需几次点击，任何人都可以与全球观众分享他们的想法和观点。然而，这种表达自由也带来了自己的挑战，特别是在诽谤的概念上。一个常常出现在关于诽谤讨论中的术语是libeller，指的是一个以书面形式对他人发表虚假声明，从而损害该人声誉的人。理解被贴上libeller标签的含义，对于任何参与公共话语的人来说都是至关重要的。 为了说明这个术语的重要性，考虑一下一个小企业主的案例，他为建立自己的品牌而不懈努力。想象一下，一个不满的前员工决定在线写一篇负面评论，声称老板从事不道德的行为。如果这篇评论包含虚假信息，那么这位前员工可能会被视为libeller。这种行为的后果可能对企业主造成毁灭性的影响，他们可能遭受财务损失和声誉损害。 被称为libeller的法律后果也可能是严重的。在许多司法管辖区，做出诽谤性陈述的个人可以被起诉索赔。这意味着做出虚假主张的人可能面临法律诉讼，导致昂贵的法庭费用和对受害者的潜在赔偿。因此，libeller的标签不仅带有道德含义，还伴随着显著的法律风险。 此外，社交媒体的兴起加剧了诽谤问题。随着Twitter和Facebook等平台的出现，个人可以迅速传播信息——无论是真还是假——遍及广泛的网络。潜在有害声明的快速传播使得某人更容易被标记为libeller。例如，一条包含虚假指控的推文可能在几分钟内迅速传播，引发公众愤怒和对被指控者的反击，即使在他们有机会为自己辩护之前。 鉴于这些挑战，个人必须认真思考他们在线分享的信息。在发布关于某人的评论或评论之前，应该考虑信息是否真实，以及它是否可能被解读为诽谤。进行负责任的沟通有助于防止成为libeller，并保护公共话语的完整性。 教育在打击诽谤和理解libeller这一术语方面发挥着至关重要的作用。学校和社区组织应提供媒体素养资源，教导个人如何辨别可信的信息与误导性声明。通过培养批判性思维的环境，社会可以减少诽谤事件的发生，促进更健康的讨论。 总之，libeller这一术语概括了我们现代世界中的一个严重问题。在我们应对数字沟通的复杂性时，意识到我们言辞的潜在后果至关重要。通过关注我们分享的信息，并寻求理解诽谤的含义，我们可以为我们的社区贡献更尊重和真实的对话。最终，我们必须记住，虽然每个人都有权表达自己的意见，但以负责任的方式这样做至关重要，以避免成为libeller并伤害他人。