libellous

简明释义

英[ˈlaɪbələs]美[ˈlaɪbələs]

adj. 诽谤的；损害名誉的（等于 libelous）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Bloggers are too numerous and too poor to be sued, and many of the servers that host their libellous musings are based outside England and Wales, and are therefore beyond the reach of English courts.

因博友如此之多，又如此贫困而无法对他们进行控告，而且大多数将他们带有诽谤文字的、沉思性质的文章聚集起来的博友并不在英格兰和威尔士的管辖范围之内，因此英国法庭也是鞭长莫及。

2.Bloggers are too numerous and too poor to be sued, and many of the servers that host their libellous musings are based outside England and Wales, and are therefore beyond the reach of English courts.

因博友如此之多，又如此贫困而无法对他们进行控告，而且大多数将他们带有诽谤文字的、沉思性质的文章聚集起来的博友并不在英格兰和威尔士的管辖范围之内，因此英国法庭也是鞭长莫及。

3.He claimed the articles were libellous and damaging to the interests of the team.

他声称那些文章造谣诽谤，对全队的利益造成了损害。

4.He says that the report is libellous.

他说报导是诽谤性的。

5.The article published by the newspaper was deemed libellous.

该报纸发布的文章被认为是诽谤性的。

6.He filed a lawsuit against the blogger for making libellous statements about him.

他因博主发表诽谤性言论而提起诉讼。

7.The company had to retract its libellous claims about a competitor.

该公司不得不撤回其关于竞争对手的诽谤性指控。

8.Publishing libellous material can lead to severe legal consequences.

发布诽谤性材料可能会导致严重的法律后果。

9.She was accused of spreading libellous rumors in the workplace.

她被指控在工作场所散布诽谤性谣言。

作文

In today's digital age, the spread of information has become faster and more accessible than ever before. However, with this ease of access comes a significant responsibility to ensure that the information shared is accurate and fair. One term that often arises in discussions about defamation and misinformation is libellous, which refers to a written statement that unjustly damages someone's reputation. Understanding the implications of making libellous claims is crucial for anyone who engages in public discourse, especially on social media platforms where rumors can spread like wildfire. The concept of libellous statements is rooted in the legal framework of defamation law. In essence, if an individual publishes false information about another person that harms their reputation, they may be held liable for defamation. This is particularly relevant in journalism, where the accuracy of reporting is paramount. Journalists must exercise due diligence to verify facts before publishing any story, as failing to do so can lead to serious legal consequences, including lawsuits for libellous content. For example, consider a scenario where a news outlet publishes an article accusing a public figure of criminal activity without sufficient evidence. If the allegations are proven false, the public figure could pursue legal action against the outlet for publishing libellous statements. This not only affects the reputation of the individual involved but also undermines the credibility of the media organization, resulting in a loss of trust among its audience. Moreover, the rise of social media has exacerbated the risks associated with libellous statements. Users can easily share posts or comments that may contain unverified claims about others, leading to a rapid dissemination of potentially damaging information. This phenomenon raises ethical questions about accountability and the role of social media platforms in moderating content. While some argue for free speech, others emphasize the need for responsible communication to prevent libellous accusations from causing harm. To illustrate the impact of libellous statements, we can look at high-profile cases where individuals have suffered severe consequences due to false allegations. Celebrities and public figures often find themselves at the center of libellous claims, which can lead to public backlash, loss of endorsements, and emotional distress. For instance, a celebrity accused of misconduct may face immediate repercussions, such as being dropped from projects or losing fans, even if the claims are later proven false. In addition to the legal ramifications, there is a moral imperative to avoid making libellous statements. The power of words can have lasting effects on individuals and communities. When we choose to speak or write, we should strive to uphold integrity and respect for others. Engaging in gossip or spreading rumors can contribute to a toxic environment where libellous statements become commonplace, ultimately harming social cohesion. In conclusion, the term libellous encapsulates a critical issue in our society today. As consumers and producers of information, we must remain vigilant about the content we share and the potential consequences it may have on others. By fostering a culture of accountability and respect, we can mitigate the risks associated with libellous statements and promote a healthier discourse in our communities. It is essential to remember that while we have the right to express our opinions, we also hold the responsibility to ensure that our words do not unjustly harm others' reputations.

在当今数字时代，信息传播的速度比以往任何时候都快且更容易获取。然而，随着这种便利的访问而来的是一项重要责任，即确保所分享的信息是准确和公正的。在有关诽谤和错误信息的讨论中，一个经常出现的术语是libellous，指的是一种书面声明，它不公正地损害某人的声誉。理解做出libellous声明的影响对于任何参与公共话语的人来说都是至关重要的，尤其是在社交媒体平台上，谣言可以像野火一样蔓延。 libellous声明的概念根植于诽谤法的法律框架中。从本质上讲，如果一个人发布关于另一个人的虚假信息，损害了他们的声誉，他们可能会因诽谤而承担责任。这在新闻报道中尤为相关，因为报道的准确性至关重要。记者必须尽职调查，以验证事实，然后才能发布任何故事，因为如果未能做到这一点，可能会导致严重的法律后果，包括因发布libellous内容而面临诉讼。 例如，考虑一个场景，新闻机构发布了一篇文章，指控一位公众人物犯罪，而没有足够的证据。如果这些指控被证明是虚假的，该公众人物可以对该机构提起法律诉讼，因发布libellous声明。这不仅影响了相关个人的声誉，也削弱了媒体组织的可信度，导致其受众失去信任。 此外，社交媒体的兴起加剧了与libellous声明相关的风险。用户可以轻易分享可能包含未经证实的关于他人的声明的帖子或评论，导致潜在有害信息的快速传播。这种现象引发了关于问责制和社交媒体平台在内容管理中的角色的伦理问题。虽然一些人主张言论自由，但其他人则强调需要负责任的沟通，以防止libellous指控造成伤害。 为了说明libellous声明的影响，我们可以看看一些高调案件，其中个人因虚假指控而遭受严重后果。名人和公众人物常常成为libellous指控的中心，这可能导致公众反弹、失去代言和情感困扰。例如，一位被指控不当行为的名人可能会面临立即的后果，例如被项目撤回或失去粉丝，即使这些指控后来被证明是虚假的。 除了法律后果，还有道德上的必要性，避免做出libellous声明。言辞的力量可能对个人和社区产生持久影响。当我们选择说话或写作时，我们应该努力保持诚信和对他人的尊重。参与八卦或传播谣言可能会导致一种有毒环境，在这种环境中，libellous声明变得司空见惯，最终损害社会凝聚力。 总之，libellous这个术语概括了当今社会中的一个关键问题。作为信息的消费者和生产者，我们必须时刻警惕我们分享的内容及其可能对他人的后果。通过培养问责和尊重的文化，我们可以减轻与libellous声明相关的风险，并促进我们社区中更健康的言论。重要的是要记住，虽然我们有权表达我们的观点，但我们也有责任确保我们的言辞不会不公正地伤害他人的声誉。