libel

简明释义

英[ˈlaɪb(ə)l]美[ˈlaɪbl]

n. 诽谤罪；诋毁；毁坏名誉的东西；控诉书

vt. 中伤；控告；对……进行诽谤

vi. 进行文字诽谤

复 数 l i b e l s

第 三 人 称 单 数 l i b e l s

现 在 分 词 l i b e l l i n g 或 l i b e l i n g

过 去 式 l i b e l l e d 或 l i b e l e d

过 去 分 词 l i b e l l e d 或 l i b e l e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Mr. Warren sued for libel over the remarks.

沃伦先生对那些评论提起诽谤诉讼。

2.Dr Xiao's response was to take Dr Fang to court for libel-frequently.

肖医生的反应是把方博士多次告到民事法庭。

3.He sued the newspaper for libel.

他起诉那家报社犯有诽谤罪。

4.Canadian libel law is based on English common law.

加拿大的诽谤法是以英国的习惯法为根据的。

5.The board has banned the film on the grounds that it contravenes criminal libel laws.

委员会已经禁播了那部电影，因为它违反了诽谤法。

6.It is the same with obscenity, hate crime and libel.

这等同于淫秽，仇恨犯罪和诽谤。

7.The libel claim followed an article that insinuated the president was lying.

一篇文章因暗示总统撒谎受到了诽谤索赔。

8.The newspaper was sued for publishing a false article that was considered to be libel.

这家报纸因发布一篇被认为是诽谤的虚假文章而被起诉。

9.He claimed the blog post was libel because it contained misleading information about his business.

他声称这篇博客文章构成了诽谤，因为其中包含了关于他生意的误导性信息。

10.The celebrity filed a lawsuit against the magazine for libel after they published a damaging story.

这位名人因杂志发布了一则有损声誉的故事而对其提起了诽谤诉讼。

11.To win a libel case, you must prove that the statement was false and harmful.

要赢得诽谤案件，你必须证明该陈述是虚假的并且有害的。

12.The definition of libel includes any written statement that unjustly damages someone's reputation.

诽谤的定义包括任何书面声明，这些声明不公正地损害了某人的声誉。

作文

In the age of information and social media, the concept of libel (诽谤) has become increasingly relevant. Libel refers to a false statement published in a permanent form that damages a person's reputation. This can occur through various mediums, including newspapers, magazines, and online platforms. Understanding libel is crucial, especially for individuals who engage in public discourse or have a significant online presence. The legal definition of libel varies by jurisdiction, but it generally requires the plaintiff to prove that the statement was not only false but also harmful to their reputation. For instance, if a journalist publishes an article claiming that a public figure committed a crime without any evidence, this could constitute libel. The affected individual may then pursue legal action against the journalist or the publication for damages. One of the most significant aspects of libel is the distinction between opinion and fact. Statements of opinion are typically protected under free speech laws, while statements of fact that can be proven true or false are more vulnerable to libel claims. This distinction can sometimes blur, especially in heated political debates where opinions may be presented as facts. The rise of social media has complicated the landscape of libel. With millions of users sharing information at lightning speed, false statements can spread rapidly, often without verification. This creates a challenging environment for both individuals and businesses. For example, a false accusation made about a company on Twitter can lead to significant financial losses and damage to its reputation before the company even has a chance to respond. Moreover, the anonymity provided by the internet can embolden individuals to make defamatory statements without fear of repercussions. This has led to a surge in libel cases, as victims seek justice for the harm caused by these unfounded claims. However, pursuing legal action can be costly and time-consuming, often deterring individuals from seeking redress. To mitigate the risks associated with libel, individuals should practice responsible communication. This includes verifying information before sharing it and being cautious about making definitive statements regarding others’ character or actions. Media outlets and journalists also bear a significant responsibility to ensure their reporting is accurate and fair, as failure to do so can lead to serious legal consequences. In conclusion, libel (诽谤) is a critical issue in today's information-driven society. As we navigate the complexities of communication in the digital age, it is essential to understand the implications of our words and the potential consequences of spreading false information. By fostering a culture of accountability and respect for truth, we can help protect individuals' reputations and contribute to a more informed public discourse.