liberals
简明释义
n. 自由主义者(liberal 的复数)
英英释义
单词用法
普通教育;文科教育 | |
n. 自由党 |
同义词
进步主义者 | 进步主义者倡导社会正义和平等。 | ||
左派 | Leftists often support policies that promote wealth redistribution. | 左派通常支持促进财富再分配的政策。 | |
改革派 | 改革派旨在从内部改变系统。 | ||
社会自由主义者 | 社会自由主义者关注个人权利和自由。 |
反义词
保守派 | 保守派反对许多自由派的政策。 | ||
反动派 | Reactionaries often resist social change advocated by liberals. | 反动派通常抵制自由派倡导的社会变革。 |
例句
1.For decades, liberals have relied on the courts to push through some of their most cherished policies.
数十年来,自由派依靠各级法院通过了一些他们最为珍视的政策。
2.As I've already said Menelaus and the liberals accept it and promote it.
我之前已经说了,Menelaus和自由派,接受希腊化,推广希腊化。
3.This is often the case with liberals and conservatives.
自由派与保守派之争多是如此。
4.So why haven't liberals and conservatives gone their separate ways before now?
那么为什么在此之前自由派和保守派没有他们各自分立的道路呢?
5.The Tory leader, David Cameron, a friend of Mr Reinfeldt’s, is also in coalition with the liberals.
保守党领导人也是雷茵费尔德先生的朋友,卡梅隆也站在自由者这一边。
6.The Tory leader, David Cameron, a friend of Mr Reinfeldt's, is also in coalition with the liberals.
保守党领导人也是雷茵费尔德先生的朋友,卡梅隆也站在自由者这一边。
7.Many liberals 自由主义者 advocate for social justice and equality.
许多自由主义者倡导社会公正和平等。
8.In the debate, the liberals 自由主义者 pushed for more progressive policies.
在辩论中,自由主义者推动了更进步的政策。
9.The liberals 自由主义者 believe in the importance of individual rights.
自由主义者认为个人权利的重要性。
10.Some liberals 自由主义者 are calling for climate action to protect the environment.
一些自由主义者呼吁采取气候行动以保护环境。
11.The liberals 自由主义者 often support immigration reform.
自由主义者通常支持移民改革。
作文
In contemporary society, the term liberals (自由主义者) often comes up in discussions about politics, culture, and social issues. The liberals (自由主义者) advocate for progressive reforms and emphasize the importance of individual rights and freedoms. They believe that society should be inclusive and that diversity is a strength rather than a weakness. This perspective is particularly relevant in today's globalized world where people from different backgrounds interact more than ever before. Historically, liberals (自由主义者) have played a crucial role in shaping democratic values. They champion civil liberties, equal rights, and social justice. For instance, movements led by liberals (自由主义者) have been instrumental in advancing women's rights, LGBTQ+ rights, and racial equality. These efforts reflect a commitment to creating a fair and just society where everyone has the opportunity to thrive. Moreover, liberals (自由主义者) tend to support government intervention in the economy to address social inequalities. They argue that without such intervention, wealth and resources become concentrated in the hands of a few, leading to systemic injustices. By advocating for policies like universal healthcare, affordable education, and environmental protections, liberals (自由主义者) aim to create a safety net for the most vulnerable members of society. Critics of liberals (自由主义者) often argue that their policies can lead to excessive government control and a reduction in personal freedoms. They claim that liberals (自由主义者) prioritize collective rights over individual liberties, which can stifle innovation and personal responsibility. However, liberals (自由主义者) counter that their approach is necessary to ensure that everyone has access to basic rights and opportunities. The debate between liberals (自由主义者) and conservatives is a fundamental aspect of democratic discourse. Each side brings valuable perspectives to the table, and the clash of ideas often leads to more robust policies. For example, while liberals (自由主义者) may push for reforms in immigration policy to create pathways for undocumented immigrants, conservatives might emphasize the importance of border security and law enforcement. This dynamic tension can foster compromise and lead to more effective governance. In recent years, the rise of populism has challenged traditional liberals (自由主义者) by appealing to feelings of discontent among certain segments of the population. Populist movements often criticize liberals (自由主义者) for being out of touch with the needs of ordinary people, arguing that their policies benefit only a select few. This has forced liberals (自由主义者) to reevaluate their strategies and communication methods to better connect with constituents. In conclusion, the term liberals (自由主义者) encompasses a wide range of beliefs and values centered around individual rights, social justice, and progressive change. While they face criticism and challenges, their contributions to society remain significant. Understanding the role of liberals (自由主义者) in shaping modern political landscapes is essential for anyone looking to engage thoughtfully in civic discourse. As we navigate the complexities of our world, the dialogue between liberals (自由主义者) and other political ideologies will continue to be vital in promoting understanding and progress.
在当代社会,术语liberals(自由主义者)常常出现在关于政治、文化和社会问题的讨论中。liberals(自由主义者)倡导进步改革,并强调个人权利和自由的重要性。他们认为,社会应该是包容的,多样性是一种力量,而不是一种弱点。这种观点在当今全球化的世界中尤其相关,因为来自不同背景的人们比以往任何时候都更加互动。 历史上,liberals(自由主义者)在塑造民主价值观方面发挥了至关重要的作用。他们倡导公民自由、平等权利和社会正义。例如,由liberals(自由主义者)领导的运动在推动女性权利、LGBTQ+权利和种族平等方面发挥了重要作用。这些努力反映了创造一个公平和公正社会的承诺,在这个社会中,每个人都有机会蓬勃发展。 此外,liberals(自由主义者)倾向于支持政府对经济的干预,以解决社会不平等问题。他们认为,如果没有这种干预,财富和资源就会集中在少数人手中,导致系统性的社会不公。通过倡导普遍医疗保健、可负担的教育和环境保护等政策,liberals(自由主义者)旨在为社会中最脆弱的成员创造安全网。 对liberals(自由主义者)的批评者常常认为,他们的政策可能导致过度的政府控制和个人自由的减少。他们声称,liberals(自由主义者)优先考虑集体权利而非个人自由,这可能抑制创新和个人责任。然而,liberals(自由主义者)反驳说,他们的方法是确保每个人都能获得基本权利和机会所必需的。 liberals(自由主义者)与保守派之间的辩论是民主话语的基本方面。每一方都带来了有价值的观点,思想的碰撞往往导致更强有力的政策。例如,虽然liberals(自由主义者)可能推动移民政策改革,为无证移民创造途径,但保守派可能强调边境安全和执法的重要性。这种动态的紧张关系可以促进妥协,并导致更有效的治理。 近年来,民粹主义的崛起挑战了传统的liberals(自由主义者),因为民粹主义吸引了某些人口群体的不满情绪。民粹主义运动常常批评liberals(自由主义者)与普通人的需求脱节,认为他们的政策只惠及少数人。这迫使liberals(自由主义者)重新评估他们的策略和沟通方式,以更好地与选民建立联系。 总之,术语liberals(自由主义者)包含了一系列围绕个人权利、社会正义和进步变革的信念和价值观。尽管他们面临批评和挑战,但他们对社会的贡献仍然显著。理解liberals(自由主义者)在塑造现代政治格局中的角色对于任何希望在公民话语中进行深思熟虑的人都是必不可少的。在我们应对世界的复杂性时,liberals(自由主义者)与其他政治意识形态之间的对话将继续在促进理解和进步方面发挥重要作用。
文章标题:liberals的意思是什么
文章链接:https://www.liuxue886.cn/danci/406771.html
本站文章均为原创,未经授权请勿用于任何商业用途
发表评论