lobotomizing

简明释义

英[ləˈbɒtəmaɪzɪŋ]美[ləˈbɑːtəˌmaɪzɪŋ]

vt.为……施行脑白质切除术；<非正式>使迟钝（lobotomize 的现在分词）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Instead of imagining lobotomizing us, turning us into rats, suppose we just say, look, the problem is really this.

这次不用额叶切除术把我们变成老鼠，问题的症结是。

2.Instead of imagining lobotomizing us, turning us into rats, suppose we just say, look, the problem is really this.

这次不用额叶切除术把我们变成老鼠，问题的症结是。

3.The doctor explained that the procedure was not just about removing parts of the brain, but rather about lobotomizing 脑叶切除 the patient's emotional responses.

医生解释说，这个手术不仅仅是移除大脑的一部分，而是关于lobotomizing 脑叶切除病人的情感反应。

4.In the past, some believed lobotomizing 脑叶切除 would cure severe mental illness, but it often led to devastating side effects.

在过去，一些人认为lobotomizing 脑叶切除可以治愈严重的精神疾病，但这通常会导致毁灭性的副作用。

5.The film depicted a dystopian future where the government was lobotomizing 脑叶切除 dissenters to maintain control.

这部电影描绘了一个反乌托邦的未来，政府通过lobotomizing 脑叶切除异议者来维持控制。

6.After lobotomizing 脑叶切除 the patient, the doctors noted a significant change in personality.

在对病人进行lobotomizing 脑叶切除后，医生们注意到性格发生了显著变化。

7.Critics argue that lobotomizing 脑叶切除 is an inhumane practice that strips individuals of their autonomy.

批评者认为，lobotomizing 脑叶切除是一种不人道的做法，剥夺了个人的自主权。

作文

The term lobotomizing refers to a controversial surgical procedure that was once used to treat various mental illnesses by severing connections in the brain's prefrontal cortex. While it was thought to alleviate symptoms of severe psychiatric disorders, the reality of lobotomizing is far more complex and troubling. In the mid-20th century, this procedure gained popularity as a solution for patients who were deemed unmanageable or whose conditions did not respond to traditional therapies. However, the consequences of lobotomizing often led to significant changes in personality and cognitive function, leaving individuals in a state that many would argue is worse than their original condition. The ethical implications of lobotomizing are profound. Many patients underwent the procedure without fully understanding the risks involved or without giving informed consent. Families, desperate for a solution to their loved ones' suffering, sometimes pushed for the surgery, believing it to be a last resort. This raises questions about the morality of medical interventions and the responsibilities of healthcare providers. Should a doctor have the authority to make such irreversible decisions? The history of lobotomizing serves as a cautionary tale about the potential for abuse in the medical field, particularly when it comes to vulnerable populations. Moreover, the societal perception of mental illness during the era when lobotomizing was prevalent contributed to its acceptance. Mental health issues were often stigmatized, and individuals suffering from them were frequently marginalized. The idea of a quick fix through surgery was appealing to many, overshadowing the need for compassionate care and understanding. As society has evolved, so too has our approach to mental health treatment. Today, we emphasize therapy, medication, and holistic approaches rather than invasive procedures like lobotomizing. In contemporary discussions about mental health, the lessons learned from the practice of lobotomizing remind us of the importance of empathy and informed consent. We recognize that each individual's experience with mental illness is unique and that one-size-fits-all solutions can be harmful. This awareness has led to more personalized treatment plans that consider the psychological, social, and emotional needs of patients. Furthermore, advancements in neuroscience have provided us with a deeper understanding of the brain and its complexities. Instead of resorting to drastic measures like lobotomizing, researchers are exploring innovative therapies that target specific areas of the brain without causing permanent damage. Techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) offer hope for those struggling with mental health issues, allowing for targeted intervention without the ethical concerns associated with lobotomizing. In conclusion, the historical practice of lobotomizing highlights the critical need for ethical considerations in medical treatments, particularly in the realm of mental health. As we continue to advance our understanding and treatment of psychiatric disorders, we must remain vigilant against the mistakes of the past. By prioritizing patient autonomy, informed consent, and compassionate care, we can ensure that the legacy of lobotomizing serves not as a model for future practices but as a reminder of the importance of treating individuals with dignity and respect.

“lobotomizing”这个词指的是一种有争议的外科手术，曾经用于通过切断大脑前额叶皮层的连接来治疗各种精神疾病。虽然它被认为可以缓解严重精神障碍的症状，但“lobotomizing”的现实情况要复杂得多，也更令人不安。在20世纪中期，这种手术因其能为那些被视为无法管理或其病情对传统治疗无反应的患者提供解决方案而受到欢迎。然而，“lobotomizing”的后果通常会导致个性和认知功能的显著变化，使得个体的状态往往比他们原来的情况更糟。 “lobotomizing”的伦理影响是深远的。许多患者在没有充分理解相关风险或未给予知情同意的情况下接受了这种手术。家庭为了寻找解决亲人痛苦的办法，有时会推动手术，认为这是最后的选择。这引发了关于医疗干预道德的质疑，以及医疗提供者的责任。医生是否应该有权做出如此不可逆转的决定？“lobotomizing”的历史作为医学领域潜在滥用的警示故事，尤其是在面对脆弱人群时。 此外，在“lobotomizing”盛行的时代，社会对精神疾病的看法也促进了它的接受。精神健康问题常常被污名化，遭受这些问题的人经常被边缘化。通过手术快速解决问题的想法对许多人来说很有吸引力，掩盖了对富有同情心的护理和理解的需求。随着社会的发展，我们对精神健康治疗的方法也在演变。如今，我们强调心理治疗、药物治疗和整体方法，而不是像“lobotomizing”这样的侵入性程序。 在当代关于精神健康的讨论中，从“lobotomizing”的实践中吸取的教训提醒我们关注同情心和知情同意的重要性。我们认识到每个人与精神疾病的经历都是独特的，千篇一律的解决方案可能是有害的。这种意识促使我们制定更个性化的治疗计划，考虑患者的心理、社会和情感需求。 此外，神经科学的进步使我们对大脑及其复杂性有了更深入的理解。研究人员正在探索创新的疗法，针对大脑特定区域进行干预，而不会造成永久性损伤，而不是诉诸于像“lobotomizing”这样的极端措施。经颅磁刺激（TMS）和深脑刺激（DBS）等技术为那些与精神健康问题作斗争的人提供了希望，使他们能够进行针对性的干预，而不存在与“lobotomizing”相关的伦理问题。 总之，历史上“lobotomizing”的实践突显了在医疗治疗中，特别是在精神健康领域，伦理考量的关键需要。随着我们继续推进对精神障碍的理解和治疗，我们必须时刻警惕过去的错误。通过优先考虑患者自主权、知情同意和富有同情心的护理，我们可以确保“lobotomizing”的遗产不仅仅是未来实践的模型，而是提醒我们以尊严和尊重对待个体的重要性。