mechanistic

简明释义

英[ˌmekəˈnɪstɪk]美[ˌmekəˈnɪstɪk]

adj. 机械论的；机械学的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.And finally, it might be hard to mesh the mechanistic notion of the mind with the idea that people have spiritual value.

最后，将心理的机械论观点，与人类拥有精神价值的观点，相联系也是非常困难的。

2.Writing is mechanical, learning a language, driving a car is mechanical; acquiring any kind of technical knowledge and acting according to that is mechanistic.

写字是机械的，学一种语言，驾驶汽车是机械的，获取任何一种专业知识并应用它是机械的。

3.It's not a mechanistic source term, it's an assumed source term which obviously affects offsite release.

那不是一个机械的来源规定，那是一个假定的来源规定，它很明显地影响着，站外释放。

4.There is a non-mechanistic action but you have to discover it.

有一种不机械的行动，但是你必须去发现。

5.Mechanistic studies would also help identify the active ingredients in the pomegranate and their direct mode of action.

机构研究也将帮助辨认在石榴和他们的直接模式的行动之间的有效成分。

6.No sort of mechanistic rationalism is ever possible and there is a strong hatred of the idea of logical necessity.

机械式的惟理主义在这里是永远不可能的，而且对于逻辑的必须概念都抱着一种憎恶的态度。

7.Minimizing risks and maximizing profitability by copying market leaders requires both organic and mechanistic elements in the organization's structure.

模仿市场领导者，寻求风险最小化与利润最大化，在组织结构中则需同时兼顾有机式与机械式的元素。

8.Therefore, it depends on something; that is mechanistic.

因此，它依赖某物；这就是机械化的。

9.The scientist adopted a mechanistic approach to understand the biological processes involved in cell division.

科学家采用了一种机械的方法来理解细胞分裂中涉及的生物过程。

10.In his theory, he emphasized a mechanistic view of the universe, where every event has a cause.

在他的理论中，他强调了宇宙的机械的观点，即每个事件都有一个原因。

11.The mechanistic model of the economy suggests that all economic behaviors can be predicted based on certain variables.

经济的机械的模型表明，所有经济行为都可以根据某些变量进行预测。

12.Critics argue that a purely mechanistic understanding of human behavior ignores the complexities of emotions and social influences.

批评者认为，纯粹的机械的人类行为理解忽视了情感和社会影响的复杂性。

13.The mechanistic design of the machine allows for precise control over its operations.

该机器的机械的设计允许对其操作进行精确控制。

作文

In the realm of science and philosophy, the term mechanistic (机械论的) often surfaces in discussions about the nature of reality and the functioning of systems. A mechanistic approach to understanding the world suggests that everything can be explained through physical processes and interactions. This perspective is rooted in the belief that the universe operates like a vast machine, where every component has a specific role and function, working together to create the phenomena we observe. Historically, the mechanistic worldview gained prominence during the Enlightenment, when thinkers like Isaac Newton and René Descartes began to describe the natural world in terms of laws and equations. Newton's laws of motion, for instance, provided a framework for understanding how objects move and interact, reinforcing the idea that the universe is predictable and orderly. This mechanistic philosophy extended beyond physics into biology, psychology, and even sociology, leading to the development of various models that sought to explain complex behaviors and systems through simple, linear relationships. However, while the mechanistic view has its merits, it also faces significant criticism. Critics argue that this perspective oversimplifies the complexity of life and the interconnectedness of systems. For example, in biology, the reductionist approach of breaking down organisms into their constituent parts may overlook the emergent properties that arise from interactions within ecosystems. Life is not merely a collection of individual components; rather, it is a dynamic web of relationships that cannot be fully understood through a purely mechanistic lens. Moreover, the rise of quantum mechanics has introduced further challenges to the mechanistic paradigm. At the quantum level, particles do not behave in predictable ways, defying the classical notions of causality and determinism. This has led some scientists and philosophers to argue for a more holistic understanding of reality, one that embraces uncertainty and the role of observation in shaping outcomes. As a result, the limitations of the mechanistic approach have prompted a reevaluation of how we understand the universe and our place within it. In contemporary discussions, the mechanistic view is often contrasted with holistic or systems-thinking approaches. While a mechanistic perspective may focus on individual elements and their functions, a systems approach emphasizes the relationships and interactions between components. This shift is evident in fields such as ecology, where understanding the balance of ecosystems requires an appreciation of the intricate connections between species and their environments. Ultimately, the debate between mechanistic and holistic perspectives reflects a broader inquiry into the nature of knowledge and understanding. As we continue to explore the complexities of the world around us, it is essential to recognize the value of both approaches. The mechanistic framework provides valuable insights into the workings of specific systems, while holistic perspectives remind us of the importance of context and interconnectedness. By integrating these viewpoints, we can develop a more nuanced understanding of reality, one that honors the richness of existence while acknowledging the underlying structures that govern it.

在科学和哲学领域，术语mechanistic（机械论的）常常出现在关于现实本质和系统运作的讨论中。采用mechanistic的方法来理解世界表明，一切都可以通过物理过程和相互作用来解释。这种观点根植于宇宙像一台庞大的机器运作的信念，其中每个组件都有特定的角色和功能，共同作用以创造我们观察到的现象。 历史上，mechanistic世界观在启蒙时代变得突出，当时像艾萨克·牛顿和勒内·笛卡尔这样的思想家开始用法律和方程式来描述自然界。例如，牛顿的运动定律为理解物体如何运动和相互作用提供了框架，加强了宇宙是可预测和有序的这一观点。这种mechanistic哲学不仅延伸到物理学，还影响了生物学、心理学甚至社会学，导致了各种模型的发展，这些模型试图通过简单的线性关系来解释复杂的行为和系统。 然而，虽然mechanistic观点有其优点，但它也面临着重大批评。批评者认为，这种观点过于简化了生活的复杂性和系统的相互联系。例如，在生物学中，将生物体分解为其组成部分的还原论方法可能忽视生态系统内部相互作用所产生的涌现特性。生命不仅仅是单个组件的集合；相反，它是一个动态的关系网络，无法仅通过纯粹的mechanistic视角来全面理解。 此外，量子力学的兴起进一步挑战了mechanistic范式。在量子层面上，粒子的行为并不符合可预测的方式，违背了经典因果关系和决定论的概念。这使得一些科学家和哲学家主张更全面地理解现实，接受不确定性和观察在塑造结果中的作用。因此，mechanistic方法的局限性促使我们重新评估如何理解宇宙及我们在其中的位置。 在当代讨论中，mechanistic观点通常与整体或系统思维的方法形成对比。虽然mechanistic视角可能关注个别元素及其功能，但系统方法则强调组件之间的关系和相互作用。这种转变在生态学等领域显而易见，理解生态系统的平衡需要理解物种及其环境之间的复杂联系。 最终，mechanistic与整体视角之间的辩论反映了对知识和理解本质的更广泛探讨。随着我们继续探索周围世界的复杂性，认识到这两种方法的价值至关重要。mechanistic框架为特定系统的运作提供了宝贵的见解，而整体视角则提醒我们上下文和相互联系的重要性。通过整合这些观点，我们可以发展出对现实的更加细致入微的理解，既尊重存在的丰富性，又承认支配其运作的基本结构。