militarize

简明释义

英[ˈmɪlɪtəraɪz]美[ˈmɪlɪtəraɪz]

vt. 军事化；军国主义化

第 三 人 称 单 数 m i l i t a r i z e s

现 在 分 词 m i l i t a r i z i n g

过 去 式 m i l i t a r i z e d

过 去 分 词 m i l i t a r i z e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The government decided to militarize the region in response to rising tensions.

政府决定对该地区进行军事化以应对日益紧张的局势。

2.Some activists argue that the decision to militarize the police force is a threat to civil liberties.

一些活动人士认为，军事化警察部队的决定是对公民自由的威胁。

3.After the conflict, the country began to militarize its borders to prevent further incursions.

冲突后，该国开始对边界进行军事化以防止进一步入侵。

4.The school's program was criticized for attempting to militarize students through military-style training.

该学校的项目因试图通过军事风格的训练来军事化学生而受到批评。

5.Many countries have chosen to militarize their space programs amid concerns about national security.

许多国家选择在国家安全担忧中对其太空计划进行军事化。

作文

In recent years, the concept of how nations choose to militarize their societies has become a topic of intense debate. To militarize (使军事化) means to equip or prepare a country or a community with military resources and ideology, often leading to an increased presence of military personnel and hardware in civilian life. This process can manifest in various forms, from the establishment of military bases in urban areas to the promotion of military values in schools and public life. One significant aspect of militarization is its impact on national security. Countries that feel threatened by external forces often resort to militarizing their societies as a means of self-defense. For instance, nations that have experienced conflicts or are located in volatile regions may increase their military spending, expand their armed forces, and engage in military training for civilians. This can create a sense of security among the population, as they perceive that their government is taking necessary steps to protect them. However, the militarization of society can also lead to negative consequences. As military values permeate everyday life, there is a risk of normalizing violence and aggression. When military solutions are prioritized over diplomatic ones, it can create a culture where conflict becomes the first response rather than a last resort. This shift in societal values can have long-term implications for how individuals and communities interact with each other and with the state. Moreover, the militarization of police forces in many countries has raised concerns about civil liberties and the militarization of law enforcement. In numerous instances, police departments have adopted military-grade equipment and tactics, which can lead to an escalation of violence during protests or civil unrest. The presence of heavily armed police can instill fear within communities rather than providing safety and security. This blurring of lines between military and civilian roles can undermine trust in law enforcement and damage the relationship between the police and the communities they serve. The effects of militarization extend beyond national borders. Internationally, countries that are heavily militarized may engage in arms races or aggressive posturing towards one another, leading to increased tensions and instability. The global arms trade further complicates this issue, as nations compete to acquire the latest military technologies to enhance their own militarization efforts. This cycle of competition can divert resources away from essential services such as education and healthcare, ultimately harming the very citizens that these militarized states claim to protect. In conclusion, the decision to militarize a society is a complex and multifaceted issue that carries both benefits and risks. While it may provide a sense of security and readiness in the face of threats, it also has the potential to foster a culture of violence and undermine democratic values. As citizens and policymakers navigate this landscape, it is essential to critically examine the implications of militarization on both a national and global scale. Striking a balance between security and civil liberties is crucial in ensuring that societies do not become overly reliant on military solutions to resolve conflicts.

近年来，各国选择如何使其社会军事化的概念已成为激烈辩论的话题。使军事化（militarize）意味着为一个国家或社区装备或准备军事资源和意识形态，通常导致军队人员和硬件在民事生活中的增加。这一过程可以以各种形式表现出来，从在城市地区建立军事基地，到在学校和公共生活中推广军事价值观。 军事化的一个重要方面是其对国家安全的影响。感到受到外部力量威胁的国家，往往会选择使其社会军事化作为自我防卫的手段。例如，经历过冲突或位于动荡地区的国家可能会增加军事支出，扩大武装力量，并进行民众的军事训练。这可以在民众中创造一种安全感，因为他们认为政府正在采取必要措施保护他们。 然而，社会的军事化也可能导致负面后果。随着军事价值观渗透日常生活，正常化暴力和攻击的风险加大。当军事解决方案优先于外交解决方案时，可能会造成一种文化，即冲突成为第一反应，而不是最后的手段。这种社会价值观的转变可能对个人和社区之间以及与国家之间的互动产生长期影响。 此外，许多国家警察部队的军事化引发了关于公民自由和执法军事化的担忧。在许多情况下，警察部门采用军事级别的设备和战术，这可能导致抗议或社会动荡期间暴力升级。重装备的警察存在可能会在社区内造成恐惧，而不是提供安全和保障。这种军事与平民角色之间的模糊界限可能会破坏对执法机构的信任，并损害警察与其服务的社区之间的关系。 军事化的影响超越国界。在国际上，重度军事化的国家可能会相互进行军备竞赛或采取侵略性姿态，导致紧张局势和不稳定。全球军火贸易进一步复杂化了这一问题，因为各国争相获取最新的军事技术，以增强自身的军事化努力。这种竞争周期可能会将资源从教育和医疗等基本服务中转移，最终伤害到这些军事化国家声称要保护的公民。 总之，使社会军事化的决定是一个复杂且多面的议题，带来了好处和风险。虽然它可能在面对威胁时提供安全感和准备，但也有可能助长暴力文化并削弱民主价值观。在公民和政策制定者导航这一领域时，批判性地审视军事化对国家和全球的影响至关重要。在确保社会不对军事解决方案过度依赖以解决冲突的同时，在安全和公民自由之间取得平衡是至关重要的。