monopoly
简明释义
n. 垄断,垄断权;垄断企业,专卖者;独占,专利品;大富翁(棋类游戏,游戏者以玩具钞票买卖房地产)
复 数 m o n o p o l i e s
英英释义
单词用法
自然独占;天然垄断 | |
垄断地位 |
同义词
反义词
例句
1.A good education should not be the monopoly of the rich.
良好的教育不应该成为富人的专利。
2.The banks have what amounts to a monopoly.
这些银行几乎接近于垄断。
3.In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the incidence of smoking-related health problems has risen steadily for the last twenty years.
在政府垄断烟草销售的Gandania,与吸烟有关的健康问题的发生率在过去20年里稳步上升。
4.Women do not have a monopoly on feelings of betrayal.
背叛感并非是女人独有的。
5.Had he succeeded, he would have acquired a monopoly.
如果他那时成功了,他就会获得垄断地位。
6.The company has a virtual monopoly in this area of trade.
这家公司实质上已经垄断了这种贸易。
7.There are three basic sources of monopoly.
垄断有三个来源。
8.Inflation was so high that the notes were like Monopoly money.
通货膨胀严重,货币变得跟“大富翁”游戏钞票无异。
9."Monopoly" is one of the best-selling games of all time.
“大富翁”是有史以来最畅销的游戏之一。
10.The government is concerned about the tech giant's growing monopoly 垄断 in the market.
政府担心这家科技巨头在市场上日益增长的monopoly 垄断。
11.Many consumers are unhappy with the monopoly 垄断 on internet service providers in their area.
许多消费者对他们地区互联网服务提供商的monopoly 垄断感到不满。
12.The company was accused of maintaining a monopoly 垄断 by undercutting its competitors.
该公司被指控通过削价来维持其monopoly 垄断。
13.Breaking up the monopoly 垄断 could lead to more competition and lower prices.
拆分monopoly 垄断可能会导致更多竞争和更低的价格。
14.In some countries, the state holds a monopoly 垄断 on essential services like water and electricity.
在一些国家,国家对水和电等基本服务拥有monopoly 垄断。
作文
In the world of economics, the term monopoly refers to a market structure where a single seller or producer dominates the market. This situation can arise when a company gains exclusive control over a particular product or service, effectively eliminating competition. The implications of monopoly can be profound, influencing pricing, innovation, and consumer choice. A classic example of a monopoly is the case of utility companies that provide essential services like water and electricity. In many regions, these companies are the only providers available, which allows them to set prices without fear of competition. While this can lead to stability in service provision, it can also result in higher prices for consumers, as there is no alternative option available. This phenomenon raises questions about fairness and accessibility, particularly for low-income households. Moreover, monopoly power can stifle innovation. When a single company controls a market, it may lack the incentive to improve its products or services. Without competitors pushing for better quality or lower prices, consumers may find themselves stuck with subpar options. This stagnation can be detrimental to overall economic growth, as innovation is often driven by competition. Governments around the world have recognized the potential dangers of monopoly and have implemented antitrust laws to prevent such situations from arising. These laws aim to promote competition and protect consumers from the negative effects of monopoly. For instance, the breakup of AT&T in the 1980s was a significant move to dismantle its monopoly over the telephone industry in the United States. This action not only increased competition but also led to lower prices and improved services for consumers. However, the effectiveness of antitrust laws is often debated. In recent years, technology giants like Google, Amazon, and Facebook have faced scrutiny for their dominant positions in their respective markets. Critics argue that these companies exhibit monopoly behavior, stifling competition and limiting consumer choices. As a result, there have been calls for stricter regulations and even the breakup of these tech giants to restore competitive balance in the market. Additionally, the rise of digital platforms has changed the landscape of monopoly as we know it. The network effect, where the value of a product increases as more people use it, can lead to a winner-takes-all scenario. For example, social media platforms often become monopolies because users flock to the platform with the most users, making it difficult for new entrants to compete. This creates a challenging environment for regulators trying to ensure fair competition. In conclusion, while monopoly can lead to certain efficiencies in specific industries, it poses significant risks to consumer welfare and economic dynamism. Striking a balance between allowing companies to achieve economies of scale while preventing abusive market power is crucial for fostering a healthy economy. As we move forward in an increasingly digital world, understanding the nuances of monopoly will be vital in shaping policies that protect consumers and encourage innovation. Ultimately, the challenge lies in maintaining a competitive marketplace that benefits consumers while still allowing businesses to thrive. The ongoing discussion around monopoly highlights the importance of vigilance and adaptability in economic policy, ensuring that the market remains open and fair for all participants.
在经济学中,术语垄断指的是一种市场结构,其中单一的卖方或生产者主导市场。这种情况可能发生在某家公司获得对特定产品或服务的独占控制,从而有效地消除竞争。垄断的影响可能是深远的,影响定价、创新和消费者选择。 一个经典的垄断例子是提供水和电等基本服务的公用事业公司。在许多地区,这些公司是唯一可用的供应商,这使它们能够在没有竞争的情况下设定价格。虽然这可能导致服务提供的稳定性,但也可能导致消费者支付更高的价格,因为没有可替代的选择。这种现象引发了关于公平性和可及性的质疑,特别是对于低收入家庭。 此外,垄断权力可能会抑制创新。当一家公司控制一个市场时,它可能缺乏改善其产品或服务的动力。如果没有竞争者推动更好的质量或更低的价格,消费者可能会发现自己被困在劣质选项中。这种停滞可能对整体经济增长产生不利影响,因为创新通常是由竞争驱动的。 世界各国政府已经认识到垄断的潜在危险,并实施了反垄断法以防止此类情况的发生。这些法律旨在促进竞争并保护消费者免受垄断负面影响的侵害。例如,20世纪80年代AT&T的拆分是一个重要举措,旨在拆除其在美国电话行业的垄断。这一行动不仅增加了竞争,还导致消费者的价格下降和服务改善。 然而,反垄断法的有效性常常受到争议。近年来,科技巨头如谷歌、亚马逊和脸书因其在各自市场的主导地位而受到审查。批评者认为,这些公司表现出垄断行为,压制竞争并限制消费者选择。因此,人们呼吁实施更严格的监管,甚至拆分这些科技巨头,以恢复市场的竞争平衡。 此外,数字平台的崛起改变了我们对垄断的认识。网络效应,即随着更多人使用某种产品,其价值增加,可能导致赢家通吃的局面。例如,社交媒体平台往往成为垄断,因为用户涌向用户最多的平台,使新进入者难以竞争。这为试图确保公平竞争的监管者创造了一个具有挑战性的环境。 总之,虽然垄断在特定行业中可能导致某些效率,但它对消费者福利和经济活力构成了重大风险。在允许公司实现规模经济与防止滥用市场权力之间取得平衡,对于促进健康经济至关重要。随着我们在日益数字化的世界中前进,理解垄断的细微差别将对塑造保护消费者和鼓励创新的政策至关重要。 最终,挑战在于维护一个有利于消费者的竞争市场,同时仍允许企业蓬勃发展。围绕垄断的持续讨论突显了在经济政策中保持警惕和适应能力的重要性,以确保市场对所有参与者保持开放和公平。
文章标题:monopoly的意思是什么
文章链接:https://www.liuxue886.cn/danci/421496.html
本站文章均为原创,未经授权请勿用于任何商业用途
发表评论