mudslinging

简明释义

英[ˈmʌdˌslɪŋɪŋ]美[ˈmʌdˌslɪŋɪŋ]

n. 揭发隐私

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Now Mr Ellison’s bid to profit from HP’s loss has triggered both a lawsuit and a fresh bout of mudslinging.

现在埃里森先生想要从惠普的损失中谋取利益的想法引发了一场官司和新一轮的隐私大公开。

2.Now Mr Ellison’s bid to profit from HP’s loss has triggered both a lawsuit and a fresh bout of mudslinging.

现在埃里森先生想要从惠普的损失中谋取利益的想法引发了一场官司和新一轮的隐私大公开。

3.There was so much mudslinging in this campaign season it's hard to find a clean spot on either candidate.

竞选过程中有太多黑料了，两个候选人身上几乎找不到干净的地方。

4.Have you given up mudslinging and making accusations against the great Iranian nation and its officials?

你已经放弃了对伟大的伊朗国家及其官员的诽谤和控告吗？

5.Folks, these nasty lies other people keep telling about my past life are nothing but mudslinging.

各位，对方反反复复地在讲有关我过去生活的一些可恶的谎话，这些话纯粹是恶言中伤。

6.Voters are disillusioned with the mudslinging campaigns run by many candidates in recent years.

选民们对近几年很多候选人在竞选活动中互相诋毁深感失望。

7.During the election campaign, both candidates engaged in mudslinging 抹黑对方 to discredit each other.

在选举活动中，两位候选人都进行了mudslinging 抹黑对方，以贬低对方。

8.The media was filled with mudslinging 抹黑言论 as the scandal unfolded.

随着丑闻的展开，媒体充满了mudslinging 抹黑言论。

9.In sports, players sometimes resort to mudslinging 抨击对手 when they feel threatened by their competition.

在体育比赛中，运动员有时会诉诸于mudslinging 抨击对手，当他们感到受到竞争威胁时。

10.The debate quickly turned into mudslinging 相互攻击, with both sides throwing insults.

辩论迅速变成了mudslinging 相互攻击，双方都在互相侮辱。

11.Instead of discussing policies, the politicians focused on mudslinging 抨击对手 during the town hall meeting.

在市政厅会议上，政治家们没有讨论政策，而是专注于mudslinging 抨击对手。

作文

In the world of politics, mudslinging refers to the act of making malicious or defamatory statements about an opponent. This tactic is often employed during election campaigns, where candidates attempt to undermine each other's credibility and reputation. The origins of the term can be traced back to the idea of throwing mud at someone in order to tarnish their image. While many people may view mudslinging as a negative aspect of political discourse, it has become a common practice in contemporary politics. The impact of mudslinging on public perception cannot be underestimated. When candidates engage in this behavior, they often divert attention from their own policies and qualifications. Instead of discussing their visions for the future, they focus on attacking their opponents. This can create a toxic environment, where voters become disillusioned and apathetic towards the electoral process. As a result, mudslinging can contribute to lower voter turnout and increased polarization among the electorate. Moreover, mudslinging can have long-lasting effects on the individuals involved. Once a candidate's reputation is damaged, it can take years to rebuild trust with the public. In some cases, the accusations made during a campaign can follow a politician throughout their career, affecting their ability to govern effectively. This raises ethical questions about the use of mudslinging in politics. Is it ever justifiable to attack an opponent in such a personal manner? Critics argue that mudslinging detracts from meaningful discussions about policy and governance. Instead of engaging in constructive debates, candidates resort to personal attacks that do little to inform voters. This can lead to a lack of accountability, as politicians may feel they can get away with unethical behavior if they can successfully deflect criticism onto their opponents. On the other hand, some supporters of mudslinging claim that it serves a purpose in exposing the flaws and weaknesses of candidates. They argue that voters deserve to know the truth about their leaders, even if that truth is uncomfortable. In this view, mudslinging can be seen as a necessary evil in the pursuit of transparency and honesty in politics. Ultimately, the prevalence of mudslinging raises important questions about the state of democracy and the role of media in shaping public opinion. With the rise of social media, the ability to spread rumors and false information has only increased, making it easier for candidates to engage in mudslinging without facing immediate consequences. This has led to calls for greater regulation of political advertising and a more responsible approach to campaigning. In conclusion, while mudslinging may be a common tactic in political campaigns, its implications are far-reaching. It can damage reputations, distort public discourse, and contribute to voter apathy. As citizens, it is essential to remain vigilant and critical of the information presented to us during elections. By demanding higher standards from our leaders and holding them accountable for their actions, we can work towards a political landscape that prioritizes integrity over mudslinging.

抹黑在政治世界中指的是对对手进行恶意或诽谤性言论的行为。这种策略通常在选举活动期间使用，候选人试图破坏彼此的可信度和声誉。这个术语的起源可以追溯到向某人泼泥以玷污其形象的想法。虽然许多人可能将抹黑视为政治话语中的负面方面，但它已成为当代政治中的一种常见做法。 抹黑对公众认知的影响不可低估。当候选人参与这种行为时，他们通常会转移对自己政策和资质的关注。候选人不是讨论他们对未来的愿景，而是专注于攻击对手。这可能会造成一种有毒的环境，使选民对选举过程感到失望和冷漠。因此，抹黑可能会导致投票率下降和选民之间的极化加剧。 此外，抹黑对涉事个人也可能产生长期影响。一旦候选人的声誉受损，重建公众信任可能需要数年时间。在某些情况下，竞选期间提出的指控可能会伴随政治家一生，影响他们有效执政的能力。这引发了关于在政治中使用抹黑的伦理问题。以如此个人化的方式攻击对手是否有正当理由？ 批评者认为，抹黑使有意义的政策和治理讨论受到干扰。候选人不再参与建设性的辩论，而是诉诸于个人攻击，这对选民没有任何启发。这可能导致缺乏问责制，因为政治家可能会觉得如果他们能够成功地将批评转移到对手身上，他们就可以逃避不道德行为。 另一方面，一些支持抹黑的人声称，这在揭露候选人的缺陷和弱点方面起到了作用。他们认为，选民有权知道他们领导者的真相，即使这个真相令人不安。在这种观点中，抹黑可以被视为追求政治透明和诚实的必要之恶。 最终，抹黑的普遍存在引发了关于民主状态和媒体在塑造公众舆论中角色的重要问题。随着社交媒体的兴起，传播谣言和虚假信息的能力只增不减，使候选人更容易在没有立即后果的情况下参与抹黑。这导致人们呼吁对政治广告进行更严格的监管，以及对竞选采取更负责任的态度。 总之，尽管抹黑可能是政治竞选中的一种常见策略，但其影响深远。它可能损害声誉，扭曲公共话语，并导致选民冷漠。作为公民，我们必须保持警惕，对选举期间呈现给我们的信息保持批判态度。通过对我们的领导者提出更高的标准并追究他们的责任，我们可以朝着一个优先考虑诚信而非抹黑的政治格局努力。