nonlethal

简明释义

英[nɒnˈliːθəl]美[ˈnɑːnˈliːθl]

adj. 不致命的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The device shoots a nonlethal laser beam that can be seen at distances greater than 1.2 miles away.

该设备发射出一束非杀伤性激光束，在距离1.2英里以外仍可看到。

2.The tradeoff is that you take nonlethal damage when you invoke it.

代价是你使用的时候会不停受到淤伤。

3.But darts filled with a nonlethal "calmative" agent are another matter.

但是充满了非致命的“镇静剂”的飞镖是另一回事。

4.According to the characteristics of infrasonic sound effect on human body, the principle of nonlethal infrasonic weapon for on site control is put forward.

根据次声对人体作用的特点，提出了现场可控非致命次声武器的概念。

5.Sun blades deal only nonlethal damage to a lumi.

阳炎刃只会对光民造成非致命伤害。

6.Coast Guard guidance recommends nonlethal defensive tactics: frequently changing course, traveling as fast as possible, and using nets, wires and hoses to deter pirates attempting to board.

海岸警卫队的指导原则建议使用非杀伤性的防卫策略：经常改变航线、尽量高速航行及使用罗网、钢丝绳和水龙等遏阻企图登船的海盗。

7.The police used nonlethal 非致命的 weapons to disperse the crowd during the protest.

警方在抗议期间使用了非致命的武器来驱散人群。

8.Many security forces are now equipped with nonlethal 非致命的 options to handle riots more effectively.

许多安全部队现在配备了非致命的选项，以更有效地处理骚乱。

9.The military is researching nonlethal 非致命的 technologies for crowd control.

军方正在研究用于人群控制的非致命的技术。

10.Some nonlethal 非致命的 devices can incapacitate an attacker without causing permanent harm.

一些非致命的设备可以使攻击者失去能力，而不会造成永久性伤害。

11.The use of nonlethal 非致命的 force is often encouraged in law enforcement to minimize fatalities.

执法中通常鼓励使用非致命的武力，以减少死亡事件。

作文

In recent years, the debate surrounding law enforcement and public safety has intensified, particularly regarding the use of force. Many communities are calling for a shift from traditional methods of policing to more humane and effective strategies. One of the key terms that have emerged in this discussion is nonlethal, which refers to methods or weapons that are designed to incapacitate a target without causing death. This concept is becoming increasingly relevant in discussions about how to handle potentially dangerous situations while minimizing harm to all parties involved. The use of nonlethal measures can take many forms. For instance, police departments across the globe are adopting tools such as tasers, bean bag rounds, and pepper spray. These devices are intended to subdue individuals without resorting to lethal force, thereby reducing the risk of fatalities during confrontations. The hope is that by utilizing nonlethal options, officers can effectively manage dangerous situations while preserving lives. However, the implementation of nonlethal methods is not without its challenges. Critics argue that even nonlethal weapons can cause serious injuries or unintended consequences. For example, a taser, while designed to be nonlethal, can still lead to cardiac arrest or severe injury, especially if used improperly or on vulnerable populations. Furthermore, there is concern about the potential for misuse of nonlethal weapons, leading to excessive force being applied in situations where de-escalation would be more appropriate. The effectiveness of nonlethal strategies also depends heavily on training and the context in which they are employed. Law enforcement agencies must ensure that their personnel are adequately trained to assess situations accurately and determine the best course of action. This includes understanding when it is appropriate to use nonlethal options versus when to employ other tactics. Training programs should emphasize communication and conflict resolution skills, as these can often prevent situations from escalating to the point where force is necessary. Moreover, community engagement is essential in the conversation about nonlethal approaches. Police departments need to work closely with the communities they serve to build trust and foster understanding. By involving community members in discussions about safety and policing strategies, law enforcement can better align their practices with the needs and values of the community. This collaborative approach can help in establishing guidelines for the appropriate use of nonlethal measures, ensuring that they are employed judiciously and responsibly. In conclusion, the term nonlethal encapsulates an important shift in how we think about safety and policing. While nonlethal methods offer promising alternatives to lethal force, their implementation requires careful consideration, training, and community involvement. As society continues to grapple with issues of violence and safety, embracing nonlethal strategies could pave the way for a more just and humane approach to law enforcement, ultimately saving lives and fostering a greater sense of security within our communities.

近年来，围绕执法和公共安全的辩论愈演愈烈，特别是关于使用武力的问题。许多社区呼吁从传统的警务方法转向更人道和有效的策略。在这场讨论中，一个关键术语是非致命性，指的是旨在使目标失去行动能力而不造成死亡的方法或武器。这个概念在关于如何处理潜在危险情况的讨论中变得越来越相关，同时尽量减少对所有参与方的伤害。 非致命性措施的使用可以采取多种形式。例如，全球各地的警察部门正在采用电击枪、豆袋弹和胡椒喷雾等工具。这些设备旨在在不诉诸致命武力的情况下制服个人，从而降低在对抗过程中导致死亡的风险。希望通过利用非致命性选项，警员能够有效管理危险情况，同时保护生命。 然而，实施非致命性方法并非没有挑战。批评者认为，即使是非致命性武器也可能导致严重伤害或意外后果。例如，电击枪虽然旨在<非致命性，但如果使用不当或针对脆弱人群，仍然可能导致心脏骤停或严重伤害。此外，人们担心非致命性武器的滥用可能导致在本应采取缓和措施的情况下施加过度武力。 非致命性策略的有效性还在很大程度上依赖于培训和其应用的环境。执法机构必须确保其人员经过充分培训，以准确评估情况并确定最佳行动方案。这包括了解何时适合使用非致命性选项，以及何时应采取其他战术。培训项目应强调沟通和冲突解决技能，因为这些往往可以防止情况升级到需要使用武力的地步。 此外，社区参与在关于非致命性方法的讨论中至关重要。警察部门需要与他们所服务的社区密切合作，以建立信任和促进理解。通过让社区成员参与有关安全和警务策略的讨论，执法部门可以更好地将其做法与社区的需求和价值观保持一致。这种合作方法可以帮助建立关于非致命性措施适当使用的指导方针，确保它们被明智和负责任地使用。 总之，术语非致命性体现了我们对安全和警务思考的重要转变。虽然非致命性方法提供了致命武力的有希望的替代方案，但其实施需要仔细考虑、培训和社区参与。随着社会继续应对暴力和安全问题，接受非致命性策略可能为实现更公正和人道的执法方法铺平道路，最终拯救生命并在我们的社区内培养更大的安全感。