nuclearize

简明释义

英[ˈnjuːkliəraɪz]美[ˈnjʊklɪəˌraɪz]

v. 为……提供赋予核武器

第 三 人 称 单 数 n u c l e a r i z e s

现 在 分 词 n u c l e a r i z i n g

过 去 式 n u c l e a r i z e d

过 去 分 词 n u c l e a r i z e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The country plans to nuclearize its energy sector to reduce dependence on fossil fuels.

该国计划将其能源部门核能化以减少对化石燃料的依赖。

2.Some nations are concerned that the desire to nuclearize could lead to an arms race.

一些国家担心，想要核能化可能会导致军备竞赛。

3.The scientists are working on a project to nuclearize the propulsion system of spacecraft.

科学家们正在进行一个项目，以核能化航天器的推进系统。

4.Efforts to nuclearize the region have sparked international debate.

将该地区核能化的努力引发了国际辩论。

5.The government is considering policies to nuclearize its military capabilities.

政府正在考虑政策，以核能化其军事能力。

作文

In recent years, the term nuclearize has gained prominence in discussions surrounding global security and energy policy. To nuclearize a nation typically refers to the process of developing or acquiring nuclear weapons or capabilities. This term is often associated with countries that are either pursuing nuclear technology for energy purposes or seeking to establish themselves as nuclear powers for strategic reasons. The implications of nuclearizing a country are profound, affecting international relations, security dynamics, and the balance of power in various regions. One prominent example of nuclearization is North Korea, which has been actively working to nuclearize its military capabilities over the past two decades. The regime’s pursuit of nuclear weapons has led to heightened tensions not only on the Korean Peninsula but also globally. As North Korea continues to test ballistic missiles and develop nuclear warheads, the international community remains divided on how to respond. Some advocate for diplomatic negotiations, while others call for stricter sanctions or military intervention. The nuclearization of North Korea serves as a stark reminder of the challenges posed by states that seek to nuclearize without regard for international norms or agreements. On the other hand, some countries argue that nuclearizing their energy sector is essential for achieving energy independence and reducing carbon emissions. Nations like France have successfully integrated nuclear power into their energy mix, significantly decreasing reliance on fossil fuels. In this context, nuclearization does not imply a military threat but rather a commitment to sustainable energy practices. However, the challenge lies in ensuring that the peaceful use of nuclear technology does not inadvertently lead to nuclearization for military purposes. The dual-use nature of nuclear technology requires stringent oversight and international cooperation. The debate surrounding nuclearization also extends to the ethical considerations of nuclear weapons. Many argue that the existence of nuclear arsenals contributes to global insecurity, as the potential for catastrophic consequences increases with the proliferation of such weapons. The humanitarian impact of nuclear warfare is devastating, as seen in Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. Therefore, the call for disarmament and non-proliferation becomes increasingly critical in a world where the temptation to nuclearize persists. Moreover, the concept of nuclearizing a nation raises questions about the responsibilities that come with possessing nuclear capabilities. Countries that have chosen to nuclearize must adhere to international treaties, such as the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), which aims to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and promote peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Failure to comply with these obligations can lead to sanctions and isolation from the international community. In conclusion, the term nuclearize encapsulates a complex interplay of national security, energy policy, and ethical dilemmas. As nations grapple with the implications of nuclearization, it is crucial to foster dialogue and cooperation to address the challenges posed by both military and civilian uses of nuclear technology. The future of global security may very well depend on our ability to manage the delicate balance between the benefits and risks associated with nuclearization. Understanding the multifaceted nature of nuclearize will be vital as we navigate the complexities of a world increasingly shaped by nuclear capabilities.

近年来，术语nuclearize在全球安全和能源政策的讨论中变得越来越重要。nuclearize一个国家通常是指发展或获取核武器或能力的过程。这个术语通常与那些追求核技术以用于能源目的或寻求确立自己作为战略核大国的国家相关联。nuclearize一个国家的影响深远，影响国际关系、安全动态以及各地区的力量平衡。 北朝鲜是一个突出的例子，该国在过去二十年里一直积极努力nuclearize其军事能力。该政权对核武器的追求导致了不仅在朝鲜半岛上而且在全球范围内的紧张局势加剧。随着北朝鲜继续测试弹道导弹并发展核弹头，国际社会对如何应对这一问题意见不一。一些人主张通过外交谈判解决，而另一些人则呼吁实施更严格的制裁或军事干预。北朝鲜的nuclearization清楚地提醒我们，那些试图在没有考虑国际规范或协议的情况下进行nuclearize的国家所面临的挑战。 另一方面，一些国家认为，nuclearizing其能源部门对于实现能源独立和减少碳排放至关重要。像法国这样的国家成功地将核能融入其能源结构中，大大减少了对化石燃料的依赖。在这种情况下，nuclearization并不意味着军事威胁，而是对可持续能源实践的承诺。然而，挑战在于确保和平利用核技术不会无意中导致军事目的上的nuclearization。核技术的双重用途特性需要严格的监督和国际合作。 围绕nuclearization的辩论还延伸到核武器的伦理考量。许多人认为，核军备的存在加剧了全球不安全感，因为随着此类武器的扩散，灾难性后果的潜力增加。核战争的人道主义影响是毁灭性的，正如第二次世界大战期间广岛和长崎所见。因此，裁军和防扩散的呼声在一个持续存在nuclearize诱惑的世界中显得愈发重要。 此外，nuclearizing一个国家的概念引发了关于拥有核能力所带来的责任的问题。选择nuclearize的国家必须遵守国际条约，例如《核不扩散条约》(NPT)，该条约旨在防止核武器的扩散并促进核能的和平利用。未能遵守这些义务可能导致制裁和国际社会的孤立。 总之，术语nuclearize囊括了国家安全、能源政策和伦理困境之间复杂的相互作用。当各国努力应对nuclearization所带来的影响时，促进对话与合作以应对军事和民用核技术所带来的挑战至关重要。全球安全的未来可能在很大程度上取决于我们管理与nuclearization相关的利益与风险之间微妙平衡的能力。理解nuclearize的多面性将在我们应对日益受到核能力塑造的世界的复杂性时至关重要。