nukes

简明释义

英[njuːks]美[nuːks]

n. 核武器（nuke 的复数）；核发电站

v. 用核武器攻击；把……打垮（nuke 的三单形式）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Nukes now do damage instantly instead of radiating slowly outward.

核弹的伤害改成立即模式。

2.All your nukes are of the best type available to you, no matter when they were built.

你所有的核弹将是你可能拥有的最好类型，不论他们是什么时候生产的。

3.They have nukes, and if they're sufficiently pushed, they'll use them.

他们拥有核武器，如果逼得太紧，他们就会使用。

4.Pilot: those are dirty Cold War Era nukes. We would risk too much using those, the TITAN model is much safer.

驾驶员：那些是冷战时期的脏弹。太冒险了，泰坦模块更安全些。

5.Without the detonator codes, those older nukes were no more dangerous than paperweights.

没有起爆编码，这些老式的核弹头还不如镇纸危险。

6.As well, it does not help against chain nukes or disables. A good pair of disablers can kill you.

同样地，它对于防御瞬发的伤害技的连招和限制技能是没有帮助的，一对好的限制技是可以杀死你的。

7.In this series of lessons we 'learn how to use Nukes 3d compositing system.

在这一系列的教训我们'学习如何使用核武器3d合成系统。

8.Battalion: it's messing with the countdown, we can't get those nukes running. Take him out.

指挥部：它在干扰倒计时，我们无法启动那些核弹。干掉它。

9.The U.S. has already created small "bunker-buster" nukes that can penetrate underground targets.

美国已经制造了能够打击地下目标的小型“碉堡克星”核弹。

10.The country has decided to reduce its stockpile of nukes.

这个国家决定减少其核武器的nukes储备。

11.In a tense moment, the leader threatened to launch nukes if provoked.

在紧张的时刻，领导人威胁如果受到挑衅就会发射nukes。

12.The treaty aimed at limiting the number of nukes in the region.

该条约旨在限制该地区的nukes数量。

13.Scientists are studying the effects of radiation from nukes on the environment.

科学家们正在研究nukes辐射对环境的影响。

14.During the Cold War, both superpowers built up their nukes arsenal.

在冷战期间，两大超级大国都建立了自己的nukes军备。

作文

The term nukes refers to nuclear weapons, which are explosive devices that derive their destructive force from nuclear reactions. These weapons have been a significant part of military strategy since their inception during World War II. The first successful test of a nuclear weapon occurred in 1945, marking the beginning of the atomic age. The use of nukes in warfare has sparked intense ethical debates and discussions about the implications of such powerful technology. As nations developed their nuclear arsenals, the world witnessed a shift in the balance of power. The concept of mutually assured destruction (MAD) emerged, where countries with nukes would deter each other from launching an attack due to the fear of total annihilation. This led to a tense standoff during the Cold War, where both the United States and the Soviet Union amassed large stockpiles of nuclear weapons. The existence of nukes poses a significant threat to global security. Accidental launches, rogue states, or terrorist groups acquiring nuclear materials could lead to catastrophic consequences. International treaties, such as the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), aim to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and promote disarmament. However, compliance with these treaties is often questioned, as some countries continue to develop their nuclear capabilities. Public perception of nukes has evolved over the years. Initially viewed as a necessary deterrent, many now see them as a danger that must be eliminated. Movements advocating for nuclear disarmament have gained traction, pushing for a world free of nukes. The humanitarian impact of nuclear warfare is devastating, as seen in the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which resulted in immense loss of life and long-term health effects for survivors. In recent years, the discussion around nukes has also included the issue of modernization. Some nations argue that updating their nuclear arsenals is essential for maintaining security, while others contend that it contradicts disarmament efforts. This ongoing debate highlights the complexities surrounding nuclear weapons and their role in international relations. The future of nukes remains uncertain. As technology advances, new types of nuclear weapons and delivery systems are being developed, raising concerns about an arms race. Additionally, the potential for cyber warfare to target nuclear facilities adds another layer of risk. It is crucial for global leaders to engage in dialogue and work towards reducing the threat posed by nukes. In conclusion, nukes symbolize both the pinnacle of scientific achievement and the depths of human destructiveness. Understanding their implications is vital for fostering a safer world. As we reflect on the history and future of nuclear weapons, it becomes clear that the pursuit of peace and security must take precedence over the possession of nukes. Only through cooperation and commitment to disarmament can we hope to mitigate the dangers associated with these formidable weapons.

这个词‘nukes’指的是核武器，这些是从核反应中获取其破坏力的爆炸装置。自第二次世界大战期间它们问世以来，这些武器就成为军事战略的重要组成部分。1945年，第一次成功的核武器测试标志着原子时代的开始。核武器在战争中的使用引发了激烈的伦理辩论和关于这种强大技术影响的讨论。 随着各国发展其核武库，世界见证了权力平衡的变化。相互确保毁灭（MAD）的概念出现，各国拥有‘nukes’会因对完全毁灭的恐惧而阻止彼此发起攻击。这导致了冷战期间的紧张对峙，美国和苏联都积累了大量的核武器。 ‘nukes’的存在对全球安全构成重大威胁。意外发射、流氓国家或恐怖组织获得核材料可能导致灾难性后果。国际条约，如《不扩散核武器条约》（NPT），旨在防止核武器的扩散并促进裁军。然而，由于一些国家继续发展其核能力，对这些条约的遵守常常受到质疑。 公众对‘nukes’的看法多年来发生了变化。最初被视为必要的威慑，许多人现在将其视为必须消除的危险。倡导核裁军的运动逐渐增多，推动建立一个无核武器的世界。核战争的人道主义影响是毁灭性的，正如广岛和长崎的轰炸所示，造成了巨大的生命损失和幸存者的长期健康影响。 近年来，围绕‘nukes’的讨论还包括现代化问题。一些国家认为更新其核武库对维护安全至关重要，而另一些国家则认为这与裁军努力相矛盾。这场持续的辩论突显了核武器及其在国际关系中角色的复杂性。 ‘nukes’的未来仍然不确定。随着技术的进步，新型核武器和投送系统正在开发，引发了对军备竞赛的担忧。此外，网络战争可能针对核设施的潜力增加了另一层风险。全球领导人必须进行对话，并致力于减少‘nukes’带来的威胁。 总之，‘nukes’象征着科学成就的巅峰和人类毁灭的深渊。理解它们的影响对于促进一个更安全的世界至关重要。当我们反思核武器的历史和未来时，显然追求和平与安全必须优先于拥有‘nukes’。只有通过合作和对裁军的承诺，我们才能希望减轻与这些可怕武器相关的危险。