nullifier

简明释义

英[ˈnʌlɪfaɪər]美[ˈnʌlɪfaɪər]

n. 废弃者；使无效者；取消者

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The Nullifier has a new aesthetic appearance different from the Stasis Orb.

抵消者拥有不同于停滞之球的新外观。

2.The Nullifier has a new aesthetic appearance different from the Stasis Orb.

抵消者拥有不同于停滞之球的新外观。

3.The new law acts as a nullifier of the previous regulations, rendering them ineffective.

这项新法律作为之前法规的无效化者，使其失去效力。

4.In the debate, the senator proposed a nullifier to the proposed tax increase.

在辩论中，参议员提出了一项针对提议的税收增加的无效化者。

5.The software update included a nullifier for the bugs that had been reported by users.

软件更新中包含了一个针对用户报告的错误的无效化者。

6.The court's decision served as a nullifier of the earlier ruling, changing the course of the case.

法庭的裁决作为早期裁决的无效化者，改变了案件的进程。

7.He introduced a nullifier to counteract the negative effects of the policy.

他引入了一个无效化者来抵消该政策的负面影响。

作文

In the realm of law and politics, the term nullifier refers to an individual or a group that seeks to invalidate or cancel out a law or a governmental action. The concept of nullifier has a rich history in the United States, particularly during the 19th century when states like South Carolina attempted to declare certain federal laws void within their borders. This idea stems from the belief that states have the right to nullify federal laws that they perceive as unconstitutional or detrimental to their interests. The actions of these nullifiers sparked significant debates about the balance of power between state and federal authorities. One of the most notable examples of nullification occurred in 1832, when South Carolina passed the Ordinance of Nullification in response to the Tariff of 1828, which they believed unfairly favored Northern industries over Southern agriculture. The nullifiers argued that the tariff was economically oppressive and thus should be declared null and void within their state. This led to a confrontation with the federal government, highlighting the tension between state sovereignty and federal authority. President Andrew Jackson vehemently opposed the idea of nullification, stating that it was a threat to the Union and could lead to disunion. The conflict ultimately escalated to a point where Jackson threatened military action against South Carolina. However, the crisis was resolved through compromise, demonstrating that while the concept of nullifier can lead to serious conflict, it also necessitates dialogue and negotiation. The idea of nullification did not die with this event; rather, it resurfaced during various political movements throughout American history, particularly during the Civil Rights Movement when some states resisted federal mandates regarding desegregation. In contemporary discussions, the term nullifier is often used in a broader context. For instance, activists may label certain policies or laws as nullifiers of civil liberties or human rights. In this sense, a nullifier is seen as something that undermines or negates the fundamental principles of justice and equality. This usage reflects a growing concern among citizens about the potential for government overreach and the erosion of personal freedoms. Moreover, the concept of nullifier can also extend into the realm of social movements. When grassroots organizations challenge unjust laws or practices, they may be viewed as nullifiers of systemic oppression. These groups often advocate for change by employing tactics that aim to render harmful laws ineffective, thereby promoting social justice and equity. In conclusion, the term nullifier has evolved from its historical roots in legal and political discourse to encompass a broader range of meanings in contemporary society. Whether referring to individuals who challenge the legitimacy of laws or movements that seek to promote justice, nullifiers play a crucial role in shaping the landscape of governance and civil rights. Understanding the implications of this term allows us to appreciate the ongoing dialogues about authority, resistance, and the quest for a more equitable society. As we continue to navigate complex legal and ethical landscapes, the role of the nullifier remains a vital point of discussion in our pursuit of justice and equality.

在法律和政治领域，术语nullifier指的是寻求使法律或政府行为无效或取消的个人或团体。nullifier的概念在美国有着丰富的历史，特别是在19世纪，当时南卡罗来纳州试图宣布某些联邦法律在其境内无效。这一理念源于对各州有权否决他们认为违宪或对其利益有害的联邦法律的信念。这些nullifiers的行为引发了关于州与联邦权力平衡的重大辩论。 一个最著名的nullification例子发生在1832年，当时南卡罗来纳州通过了无效化条例，以回应1828年的关税，他们认为该关税不公平地偏向北方工业，而不是南方农业。这些nullifiers争辩说，该关税在经济上是压迫性的，因此应该在他们的州内被宣布为无效。这导致了与联邦政府的对抗，突显了州主权与联邦权威之间的紧张关系。安德鲁·杰克逊总统强烈反对nullification的想法，称其对联邦构成威胁，并可能导致分裂。 冲突最终升级到杰克逊威胁对南卡罗来纳州采取军事行动的程度。然而，这场危机通过妥协得以解决，表明虽然nullifier的概念可能导致严重冲突，但它也需要对话和谈判。nullification的理念并没有随着这一事件的结束而消亡；相反，它在美国历史上的各种政治运动中重新浮现，特别是在民权运动期间，一些州抵制有关种族隔离的联邦命令。 在当代讨论中，术语nullifier通常在更广泛的上下文中使用。例如，活动家可能将某些政策或法律标记为侵犯公民自由或人权的nullifiers。在这个意义上，nullifier被视为削弱或否定正义和平等基本原则的事物。这种用法反映了公民对政府过度干预和个人自由侵蚀的日益关注。 此外，nullifier的概念还可以扩展到社会运动领域。当草根组织挑战不公正的法律或做法时，它们可能被视为系统压迫的nullifiers。这些团体通常通过采用旨在使有害法律失效的策略来倡导变革，从而促进社会公正和公平。 总之，术语nullifier从其在法律和政治话语中的历史根源演变为涵盖当代社会更广泛含义的词汇。无论是指挑战法律合法性的个人，还是寻求促进正义的运动，nullifiers在塑造治理和公民权利的格局中扮演着至关重要的角色。理解这一术语的含义使我们能够欣赏关于权威、抵抗以及追求更公平社会的持续对话。在我们继续应对复杂的法律和伦理环境时，nullifier的角色仍然是我们追求正义和平等的重要讨论点。