obfuscate

简明释义

英[ˈɒbfəskeɪt]美[ˈɑːbfəskeɪt]

vt. 使模糊；使迷乱；弄暗

第 三 人 称 单 数 o b f u s c a t e s

现 在 分 词 o b f u s c a t i n g

过 去 式 o b f u s c a t e d

过 去 分 词 o b f u s c a t e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The controversial Race to Zero contest, run by New Zealand security researcher Simon Howard, allowed each team to try to obfuscate real computer viruses and exploit code samples.

由新西兰安全研究者Simon Howard运营的备受争议的“零病毒检测”竞赛允许各个参赛队伪装计算机病毒代码和漏洞利用代码样本。

2.If you would like periodically obfuscate your.

如果您想定期模糊的。

3.Some advice for Autonomy CEO Mike Lynch: You can obfuscate about what is said in a private conversation.

给Autonomy首席执行官麦克·林奇的一些建议：你尽可以在私人谈话中混淆是非。

4.If a virus writer, or a metamorphic engine, attempts to obfuscate the computation of the port number, the anti-virus system may apply constant folding to de-obfuscate it.

如果某个病毒作者或变形引擎企图使端口号的计算变得混乱，反病毒系统可能运用常数合并来反混淆。

5.This message might appear if you obfuscate the solution code.

如果您对解决方案代码进行模糊处理，可能显示此消息。

6.It is language intended not to reveal but to conceal, not to communicate but to obfuscate.

用这种语言的意图不是公开而是隐瞒，不是解释而是混淆。

7.If an assembly is public, an obfuscator should not obfuscate the names of public members.

如果组件是公用，则模糊化工具就不应该模糊化公用成员的名称。

8.The document then bounces between Tor servers in a random manner, using layers of encryption to obfuscate its source address.

然后，此文件在Tor网络各服务器间随机跳转，并使用加密层以混淆其源地址。

9.The lawyer tried to obfuscate the facts to confuse the jury.

律师试图模糊事实以混淆陪审团。

10.The technical jargon in the report seemed designed to obfuscate rather than clarify.

报告中的技术术语似乎是为了模糊而非澄清。

11.Politicians sometimes obfuscate their true intentions with vague language.

政治家有时用模糊的语言来掩盖他们的真实意图。

12.The instructions were written in a way that only served to obfuscate the process.

说明书的写法只会模糊整个过程。

13.He attempted to obfuscate the issue with irrelevant details.

他试图用无关的细节来模糊问题。

作文

In today's digital age, the ability to communicate clearly is more important than ever. However, many individuals and organizations often resort to complex language and jargon that can serve to obfuscate their true intentions. This tendency to obfuscate information can create confusion and mistrust, ultimately hindering effective communication. Understanding why people obfuscate their messages and how to combat this practice is essential for fostering transparent dialogue. One of the primary reasons people obfuscate their statements is to conceal the truth. In a world where accountability is increasingly demanded, individuals may feel pressured to present themselves in a more favorable light. This can lead to the use of vague language or euphemisms that obscure the reality of a situation. For example, a company facing financial difficulties might describe its situation as a "temporary setback" rather than admitting to losses. Such language can obfuscate the severity of the issue, misleading stakeholders and investors. Moreover, the use of technical jargon can also obfuscate meaning. Professionals in fields such as law, medicine, and technology often use specialized language that can be difficult for laypeople to understand. While this terminology may be necessary for precision among experts, it can alienate those outside the field. When professionals fail to translate their knowledge into accessible language, they risk obfuscating important information that the public needs to make informed decisions. Another factor contributing to the obfuscation of information is the desire to manipulate perceptions. Politicians, for instance, frequently employ ambiguous language to spin narratives in their favor. By using rhetoric that is open to interpretation, they can avoid taking a definitive stance on controversial issues. This strategy not only obfuscates their true positions but also enables them to appeal to a broader audience without committing to specific policies. The result is a political landscape where clarity is sacrificed for the sake of image management. To combat the tendency to obfuscate, individuals must prioritize clarity in their communication. This begins with recognizing the importance of transparency and honesty. When conveying information, it is crucial to use straightforward language that accurately represents the facts. By doing so, communicators can build trust with their audience and foster an environment where open dialogue is encouraged. Furthermore, educating oneself and others about the potential pitfalls of obfuscation can help promote clearer communication. Workshops, seminars, and training sessions focused on effective communication skills can empower individuals to express their thoughts more clearly. Additionally, encouraging feedback from peers can provide valuable insights into how messages are perceived and whether they may be unintentionally obfuscated. In conclusion, the tendency to obfuscate information can have detrimental effects on communication. Whether driven by a desire to conceal the truth, the use of complex jargon, or the manipulation of perceptions, obfuscation undermines the very foundation of effective dialogue. By prioritizing clarity and transparency, we can work towards creating a culture of honest communication that benefits everyone. Only then can we hope to eliminate the barriers created by obfuscation and foster understanding in our increasingly complex world.

在当今数字时代，清晰沟通的能力比以往任何时候都重要。然而，许多个人和组织经常诉诸复杂的语言和行话，这可能会导致混淆他们真正的意图。这种混淆信息的倾向会造成困惑和不信任，最终阻碍有效沟通。理解人们为何混淆他们的信息以及如何对抗这一做法，对于促进透明对话至关重要。 人们混淆陈述的主要原因之一是为了隐藏真相。在一个越来越要求问责制的世界中，个人可能会感到被迫以更有利的形象展示自己。这可能导致使用模糊的语言或委婉语，掩盖情况的真实情况。例如，一家面临财务困难的公司可能将其情况描述为“暂时的挫折”，而不是承认损失。这种语言可能会混淆问题的严重性，误导利益相关者和投资者。 此外，技术术语的使用也可能混淆意义。法律、医学和技术等领域的专业人士通常使用专业语言，这对外行人来说可能很难理解。虽然这种术语在专家之间的精确性上可能是必要的，但它可能使外界感到疏远。当专业人士未能将他们的知识转化为易于理解的语言时，他们就冒着混淆公众需要做出明智决策的重要信息的风险。 另一个促成信息混淆的因素是操纵看法的愿望。例如，政治家经常使用模棱两可的语言来扭转叙事，以符合他们的利益。通过使用开放解释的修辞，他们可以避免在有争议的问题上采取明确立场。这种策略不仅混淆了他们的真实立场，还使他们能够在不承诺具体政策的情况下吸引更广泛的受众。结果是，一个牺牲清晰度以维护形象管理的政治环境。 为了对抗混淆的倾向，个人必须优先考虑沟通的清晰性。这始于认识到透明和诚实的重要性。在传达信息时，使用准确代表事实的简单语言至关重要。通过这样做，沟通者可以与他们的受众建立信任，并促进开放对话的环境。 此外，教育自己和他人关于混淆潜在陷阱的知识，可以帮助促进更清晰的沟通。专注于有效沟通技巧的研讨会、讲座和培训课程可以赋予个人更清晰地表达思想的能力。此外，鼓励同伴反馈可以为信息的感知提供宝贵的见解，以及是否可能无意中混淆了信息。 总之，混淆信息的倾向可能对沟通产生有害影响。无论是出于隐瞒真相的愿望、使用复杂术语还是操纵看法，混淆都破坏了有效对话的基础。通过优先考虑清晰和透明，我们可以努力创造一种诚实沟通的文化，使每个人受益。只有这样，我们才能希望消除由混淆造成的障碍，并在我们日益复杂的世界中促进理解。