obiter

简明释义

英[ˈɒbɪtə(r)]美[ˈoʊbɪtər]

adv. 顺便；作为附带意见

abbr. （法官判决时表示的）附带意见（obiter dictum）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The facts of cases should be read, unless the case is relied upon only for an obiter dictum.

案件的事实应予以阅读，除非案件仅为附带意见的参考。

2.The facts of cases should be read, unless the case is relied upon only for an obiter dictum.

案件的事实应予以阅读，除非案件仅为附带意见的参考。

3.The judge made an interesting comment during the hearing, which was clearly an obiter 附带意见 and not part of the ruling.

法官在听证会期间发表了一个有趣的评论，这显然是一个obiter 附带意见，而不是裁决的一部分。

4.In his lecture, the professor discussed several obiter 附带意见 from past cases to illustrate his point.

在他的讲座中，教授讨论了几个过去案件中的obiter 附带意见以说明他的观点。

5.The obiter 附带意见 provided by the Supreme Court can influence lower courts in future rulings.

最高法院提供的obiter 附带意见可能影响下级法院未来的裁决。

6.During the trial, the defense attorney pointed out an obiter 附带意见 that undermined the prosecution's argument.

在审判过程中，辩护律师指出了一个削弱控方论点的obiter 附带意见。

7.Legal scholars often analyze obiter 附带意见 to understand judicial reasoning.

法律学者经常分析obiter 附带意见以理解司法推理。

作文

In the realm of law, the term obiter refers to remarks or observations made by a judge that are not essential to the decision in a case. These comments, while often insightful, do not carry the weight of legal precedent. Understanding the concept of obiter is crucial for law students and practitioners alike, as it helps delineate between binding legal principles and supplementary commentary. Obiter statements can provide valuable context and illustrate the judge's reasoning, but they should be approached with caution when interpreting the law. For instance, during a trial, a judge may make a statement about the implications of a particular law, even if that statement does not directly influence the ruling. Such statements are known as obiter dicta. They can serve as guidance for future cases, but they do not establish a binding precedent. This distinction is particularly important in common law jurisdictions, where judicial decisions play a significant role in shaping the law. The significance of obiter remarks can be observed in various landmark cases. For example, in the case of 'R v. Brown', the House of Lords made several obiter comments regarding the limits of consent in criminal law. Although these comments were not essential to the court's decision, they have been cited in subsequent cases and discussions about personal autonomy and the law. This illustrates how obiter statements can influence legal discourse, even if they lack formal authority. Moreover, understanding obiter can enhance critical thinking skills. Law students are encouraged to analyze both the ratio decidendi (the legal principle that forms the basis of the decision) and the obiter remarks to gain a comprehensive understanding of judicial reasoning. This practice not only aids in legal education but also prepares students for real-world legal challenges where nuanced interpretation is essential. In addition, obiter comments can reflect broader societal values and concerns. Judges often use these remarks to express opinions on issues that may not be directly related to the case at hand but are nonetheless relevant to the legal landscape. For instance, a judge might discuss the impact of technology on privacy rights in a case about data protection, providing a broader commentary that could influence future legislation. In conclusion, the term obiter encompasses a vital aspect of legal discourse. While obiter remarks may not hold the same authority as binding decisions, their importance in shaping legal thought and guiding future cases cannot be understated. For aspiring legal professionals, grasping the nuances of obiter commentary enriches their understanding of the law and enhances their analytical capabilities. As the legal landscape continues to evolve, the role of obiter will remain a significant topic of discussion among scholars, practitioners, and judges alike.

在法律领域，术语obiter指的是法官所作的评论或观察，这些评论对案件的裁决并不重要。这些评论虽然常常具有深刻的见解，但并不具有法律先例的权威。理解obiter的概念对于法律学生和从业者来说至关重要，因为它有助于区分具有约束力的法律原则和补充性评论。Obiter陈述可以提供宝贵的背景信息，并说明法官的推理，但在解释法律时应谨慎对待。 例如，在审判过程中，法官可能会对某项法律的影响发表意见，即使该意见并未直接影响裁决。这种陈述被称为obiter dicta。它们可以为未来的案件提供指导，但并不建立具有约束力的先例。这一区别在普通法管辖区尤为重要，因为司法判决在塑造法律方面发挥着重要作用。 Obiter言论的重要性可以在各种标志性案件中观察到。例如，在“R v. Brown”一案中，英国上议院对刑法中同意的限制做出了若干obiter评论。尽管这些评论对法院的裁决并不重要，但它们在后续案件和关于个人自主权与法律的讨论中被引用。这说明了obiter陈述如何影响法律话语，即使它们缺乏正式的权威。 此外，理解obiter可以增强批判性思维能力。法律学生被鼓励分析裁决的法律原则（ratio decidendi）和obiter言论，以全面理解司法推理。这种实践不仅有助于法律教育，也为学生准备面对现实法律挑战提供了必要的技能，尤其是在细致解读至关重要的情况下。 此外，obiter评论可以反映更广泛的社会价值观和关注点。法官常常利用这些评论表达对与案件无直接关系但与法律环境相关的问题的看法。例如，法官可能在一起数据保护案件中讨论技术对隐私权的影响，提供更广泛的评论，这可能会影响未来的立法。 总之，术语obiter涵盖了法律话语中的一个重要方面。虽然obiter评论可能没有与约束性决定相同的权威，但它们在塑造法律思想和指导未来案件中的重要性不容小觑。对于有志于从事法律职业的人来说，掌握obiter评论的细微差别能够丰富他们对法律的理解，提升他们的分析能力。随着法律环境的不断发展，obiter的角色将继续成为学者、从业者和法官之间讨论的重要话题。