objection

简明释义

英[əbˈdʒekʃn]美[əbˈdʒekʃ(ə)n]

n. 反对的理由；反对，异议；抗议（律师在审判中提出异议的插话）；恼火，烦心；缺点，缺陷；妨碍，障碍

复 数 o b j e c t i o n s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The man said, "I have no objection, but be quick and get me something to eat."

那人说：“我不反对，但是快点给我弄点吃的。”

2.Since physicians have the final say as to whether to prescribe a medication for a patient, the objection provides no grounds for concern.

由于医生对是否为病人开药有最终决定权，因此反对意见没有理由让人担心。

3.Their conscientious objection was tolerated in wartime, for after all, they are good farmers who practice the virtues of work and thrift.

在战争时期，他们认真的反对意见是被允许的，因为他们毕竟是践行劳动和节俭美德的好农民。

4.The objection that the ban would reduce restaurants' revenues is ill founded.

反对该禁令会减少餐馆收入的说法是站不住脚的。

5.Times have changed and they were embarrassed to give the true grounds for their objection and so they translated their arguments into utilitarian terms.

时代不同了，她们羞于讲出反对的真实理由，就转换为功利主义形式。

6.He gives us a version of this objection.

他给我们一些关于反对意见的看法。

7.But Zooey has a more substantive objection.

但是左伊有一个更实在的反对。

8.She raised an objection when the proposal was presented.

当提案被提出时，她提出了异议。

9.The lawyer filed an objection to the evidence presented in court.

律师对法庭上提出的证据提出了异议。

10.His main objection was that the plan was too costly.

他主要的异议是这个计划太昂贵。

11.There were no objections from the audience during the presentation.

在演示过程中，观众没有提出任何异议。

12.The committee discussed the objection and decided to revise the policy.

委员会讨论了该异议，并决定修改政策。

作文

In any democratic society, the concept of objection (反对) plays a crucial role in ensuring that diverse perspectives are heard and considered. Whether in politics, law, or everyday conversations, the ability to express a objection (反对) is fundamental to healthy discourse. This essay explores the significance of objection (反对) in various contexts, illustrating how it contributes to decision-making processes and promotes critical thinking. Firstly, in the realm of politics, objection (反对) is essential for a functioning democracy. Elected officials often face differing opinions from their constituents, and it is their duty to represent these views. When a policy is proposed, citizens have the right to voice their objection (反对) if they believe it does not serve the public interest. For instance, during town hall meetings, community members can express their objection (反对) to new zoning laws that may negatively impact their neighborhoods. This participatory process ensures that all voices are heard, fostering a sense of community engagement and accountability among leaders. Moreover, in legal settings, the concept of objection (反对) is pivotal. Lawyers frequently raise objections (反对) during trials to challenge the admissibility of evidence or the appropriateness of questions posed to witnesses. These objections (反对) are not merely procedural; they serve to uphold the integrity of the judicial process. For instance, an attorney might object to hearsay evidence, arguing that it undermines the fairness of the trial. Such objections (反对) ensure that justice is served by maintaining strict adherence to legal standards, ultimately protecting the rights of the accused and the integrity of the legal system. In everyday life, expressing a objection (反对) can lead to more thoughtful discussions and better outcomes. For example, in a group project, one member may raise a objection (反对) to a proposed plan, prompting the team to reevaluate their approach. This dialogue can uncover potential flaws and lead to innovative solutions that might not have been considered otherwise. By encouraging open communication, the act of voicing a objection (反对) fosters collaboration and creativity, allowing teams to achieve their goals more effectively. Furthermore, understanding how to appropriately express a objection (反对) is a vital skill. It requires not only the ability to articulate one's concerns but also to do so respectfully and constructively. When individuals present their objections (反对) thoughtfully, they create an environment where others feel safe to share their views as well. This mutual respect can lead to richer conversations and deeper understanding among participants. In conclusion, the concept of objection (反对) is integral to various aspects of society, from politics and law to daily interactions. It empowers individuals to voice their concerns, promotes critical thinking, and enhances decision-making processes. By recognizing the importance of objection (反对), we can cultivate a culture of open dialogue and collaboration, ultimately leading to more informed and inclusive outcomes. Embracing objection (反对) as a valuable tool rather than a hindrance will enable us to navigate complex issues with greater wisdom and understanding.

在任何民主社会中，objection（反对）这一概念在确保多样化观点被倾听和考虑方面发挥着至关重要的作用。无论是在政治、法律还是日常对话中，表达objection（反对）的能力是健康讨论的基础。本文探讨了objection（反对）在各种背景下的重要性，说明它如何有助于决策过程并促进批判性思维。 首先，在政治领域，objection（反对）对于运作良好的民主制度至关重要。选举官员经常面临来自选民的不同意见，他们有责任代表这些观点。当提出一项政策时，公民有权表达他们的objection（反对），如果他们认为该政策不符合公众利益。例如，在市政厅会议上，社区成员可以对可能对其邻里产生负面影响的新分区法表达objection（反对）。这一参与过程确保所有声音都被听到，促进了社区参与感和领导者的问责制。 此外，在法律环境中，objection（反对）的概念至关重要。律师在审判过程中经常提出objections（反对），以质疑证据的可接受性或对证人提出问题的适当性。这些objections（反对）不仅仅是程序性的；它们旨在维护司法过程的完整性。例如，一名律师可能会对传闻证据提出异议，认为这破坏了审判的公正性。这些objections（反对）确保通过严格遵循法律标准来实现正义，最终保护被告的权利和法律系统的完整性。 在日常生活中，表达objection（反对）可以引导更深思熟虑的讨论和更好的结果。例如，在一个小组项目中，一名成员可能对提议的计划提出objection（反对），促使团队重新评估他们的方法。这种对话可以发现潜在的缺陷，并导致可能未曾考虑过的创新解决方案。通过鼓励开放交流，表达objection（反对）的行为促进了合作和创造力，使团队能够更有效地实现目标。 此外，理解如何恰当地表达objection（反对）是一项重要技能。这不仅需要能够清晰表达自己的担忧，还需要以尊重和建设性的方式进行。当个人以深思熟虑的方式提出他们的objections（反对）时，他们创造了一个他人也感到安全分享自己观点的环境。这种相互尊重可以导致更丰富的对话和更深入的理解。 总之，objection（反对）这一概念在社会的各个方面都是不可或缺的，从政治和法律到日常互动。它赋予个人表达关切的权力，促进批判性思维，并增强决策过程。通过认识到objection（反对）的重要性，我们可以培养开放对话和合作的文化，最终导致更明智和包容的结果。将objection（反对）视为一种有价值的工具而非障碍，将使我们能够更智慧和理解地应对复杂问题。