ochlocracy

简明释义

英[ɒkˈlɒkrəsi]美[ɑːkˈlɑːkrəsi]

n. 暴民政治

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Ochlocracy is a political system in which a mob is the source of control.

暴民政治是一种以暴民为控制源的政治制度。

2.Ochlocracy is a political system in which a mob is the source of control.

暴民政治是一种以暴民为控制源的政治制度。

3.In a state of ochlocracy, the mob often dictates the rules, leading to chaos.

在暴民统治的状态下，暴徒往往决定规则，导致混乱。

4.The rise of ochlocracy in the city was evident during the protests, where crowds overthrew the existing order.

在抗议期间，城市中暴民统治的兴起显而易见，群众推翻了现有秩序。

5.Political analysts warn that ochlocracy can emerge when citizens lose faith in traditional governance.

政治分析家警告说，当公民对传统治理失去信心时，可能会出现暴民统治。

6.During the revolution, the government fell into ochlocracy, as leaders were unable to control the masses.

在革命期间，政府陷入了暴民统治，因为领导者无法控制群众。

7.Some historians argue that periods of ochlocracy are often followed by the establishment of more authoritarian regimes.

一些历史学家认为，暴民统治时期通常会随之出现更专制的政权。

作文

In the study of political systems, one term that often arises is ochlocracy. This term, derived from the Greek words 'ochlos' meaning crowd and 'kratos' meaning power, refers to a form of government where the mob or the mass of people holds power. Unlike a democracy, which ideally represents the will of the people through elected representatives, ochlocracy can often lead to chaos and instability. The essence of ochlocracy lies in the idea that the majority, driven by emotion rather than reason, can dictate the course of governance, often overshadowing the rights and voices of minorities. Historically, there have been numerous instances where ochlocracy has manifested itself. One notable example is during the French Revolution, when the general populace, fueled by anger and revolutionary zeal, took to the streets demanding change. While their initial intentions were rooted in the pursuit of liberty and equality, the ensuing violence and mob mentality led to a period of terror, where fear and chaos reigned supreme. This is a classic illustration of how ochlocracy can undermine the very principles it seeks to uphold. In modern contexts, we can observe the rise of ochlocracy in various forms, particularly with the advent of social media. Platforms like Twitter and Facebook can amplify the voices of the masses, sometimes leading to trending topics that reflect the collective outrage of the public. While this can be a powerful tool for social change, it can also result in hasty judgments and mob-like behavior, where individuals are vilified without due process. Such scenarios exemplify how ochlocracy can manifest in contemporary society, where the loudest voices drown out rational discourse. The dangers of ochlocracy are manifold. It can lead to the erosion of democratic institutions as decisions are made based on popular sentiment rather than informed debate. The risk of demagoguery becomes significant, as charismatic leaders may exploit the emotions of the crowd to gain power, often at the expense of truth and justice. In such environments, critical thinking and reasoned discussion are replaced by emotional appeals, ultimately resulting in governance that is reactionary rather than thoughtful. To counteract the potential pitfalls of ochlocracy, it is crucial for societies to foster an environment that encourages critical thinking and informed citizen participation. Education plays a vital role in equipping individuals with the tools necessary to engage in meaningful dialogue and to challenge the prevailing narratives that may arise from a mob mentality. Furthermore, promoting a culture of respect for differing opinions can help mitigate the extremes of ochlocracy, allowing for a more balanced approach to governance. In conclusion, while ochlocracy may seem like a distant concept, its implications are very much present in today’s world. Understanding its definition and characteristics is essential for recognizing the signs of mob rule and for preserving the integrity of democratic institutions. By being aware of the potential for ochlocracy to emerge in times of social unrest, we can work towards creating a political landscape that values reason, dialogue, and the protection of minority rights, ensuring that the voices of all citizens are heard and respected.

暴民统治这个词在政治体系的研究中常常出现。这个词源于希腊语，'ochlos' 意为人群，'kratos' 意为权力，指的是一种政府形式，其中人群或大众掌握权力。与理想上通过选举代表人民意志的民主不同，暴民统治往往会导致混乱和不稳定。暴民统治的本质在于，大多数人受到情感而非理性的驱动，能够主导治理的方向，常常掩盖少数人的权利和声音。 历史上，有许多实例表明了暴民统治的表现。其中一个显著的例子是法国大革命期间，当时普通民众因愤怒和革命热情走上街头，要求变革。虽然他们最初的意图根植于追求自由和平等，但随之而来的暴力和人群心态导致了一段恐怖时期，恐惧和混乱占据了最高地位。这是暴民统治如何破坏其所寻求维护的原则的经典例证。 在现代背景下，我们可以观察到暴民统治以各种形式的兴起，尤其是在社交媒体的出现之后。像推特和脸书这样的平台可以放大大众的声音，有时导致反映公众集体愤怒的热门话题。虽然这可以成为社会变革的强大工具，但也可能导致草率的判断和类似暴民的行为，在这种情况下，个人在没有正当程序的情况下被妖魔化。这些场景例证了暴民统治在当代社会中的表现，其中最响亮的声音淹没了理性的讨论。 暴民统治的危险多种多样。它可能导致民主机构的侵蚀，因为决策是基于流行的情绪而非经过深思熟虑的辩论。煽动主义的风险变得显著，富有魅力的领导者可能利用人群的情感来获取权力，通常以真相和正义为代价。在这样的环境中，批判性思维和理性讨论被情感诉求所取代，最终导致反应性而非深思熟虑的治理。 为了抵消暴民统治的潜在陷阱，社会必须营造一种鼓励批判性思维和知情公民参与的环境。教育在赋予个人必要工具以进行有意义对话和挑战可能出现在人群心态中的主流叙事方面发挥着至关重要的作用。此外，促进尊重不同意见的文化可以帮助减轻暴民统治的极端情况，从而使治理方法更加平衡。 总之，尽管暴民统治可能看似一个遥远的概念，但其影响在当今世界中非常明显。理解其定义和特征对于识别暴民统治的迹象以及维护民主机构的完整性至关重要。通过意识到在社会动荡时期暴民统治可能出现的潜力，我们可以努力创造一个重视理性、对话和保护少数人权利的政治环境，确保所有公民的声音都能被听到和尊重。