officialdom

简明释义

英[əˈfɪʃldəm]美[əˈfɪʃldəm]

n. 官场；官员（总称）；官僚作风

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In a sense, both the public and officialdom in China are like the archetypal parents.

在某种意义上，在中国，公众和官方就像是他的衣食父母。

2.In a sense, both the public and officialdom in China are like the archetypal parents.

在某种意义上，在中国，公众和官方就像是他的衣食父母。

3.Officialdom has been against us from the start.

官僚们从一开始就反对我们。

4.The new policy has received mixed reactions from the members of officialdom.

新政策在官僚机构成员中引起了不同的反应。

5.Navigating through officialdom can be quite challenging for newcomers.

对于新来者来说，穿梭于官僚机构可能相当具有挑战性。

6.Many people feel frustrated by the inefficiencies of officialdom.

许多人对官僚机构的低效率感到沮丧。

7.She has spent years working in officialdom, gaining valuable experience.

她在官僚机构工作了多年，积累了宝贵的经验。

8.The reforms aim to reduce the red tape associated with officialdom.

这些改革旨在减少与官僚机构相关的繁琐程序。

作文

In today's society, the concept of officialdom is often discussed in various contexts, particularly when it comes to governance and bureaucracy. Officialdom refers to the collective body of officials or authorities within a government or organization who are responsible for making decisions and implementing policies. This term can evoke a range of feelings and opinions, as many people have experienced both the positive and negative aspects of officialdom in their interactions with government institutions. On one hand, officialdom plays a crucial role in maintaining order and structure within society. Officials are tasked with upholding the law, ensuring public safety, and providing essential services to citizens. For instance, local government officials work diligently to manage resources, oversee public works projects, and address community needs. Their commitment to serving the public can lead to significant improvements in the quality of life for residents. In this light, officialdom can be seen as a necessary component of a functioning democracy, where elected representatives and appointed officials work together to create policies that benefit the populace. However, the term officialdom can also carry a negative connotation, often associated with bureaucracy, red tape, and inefficiency. Many individuals have encountered frustrating experiences when dealing with government agencies, where lengthy processes and rigid procedures can hinder progress. This aspect of officialdom can lead to a sense of disillusionment among citizens, who may feel that their voices are not being heard or that their concerns are being overlooked. The perception of officialdom as an impersonal and unresponsive entity can contribute to a growing mistrust of government institutions. Moreover, the influence of officialdom extends beyond just the actions of government officials; it also encompasses the culture and mindset that permeates bureaucratic environments. In many cases, officials may prioritize adherence to rules and regulations over innovation and responsiveness to the public's needs. This can stifle creativity and discourage proactive problem-solving, ultimately leading to stagnation within the system. As a result, calls for reform within officialdom are often met with resistance, as entrenched interests seek to maintain the status quo. To address these challenges, it is essential for citizens to engage with officialdom actively. Advocacy, public participation, and open dialogue between officials and the community can foster a more collaborative approach to governance. By holding officials accountable and demanding transparency, individuals can help reshape the perceptions and practices associated with officialdom. This engagement can lead to a more responsive and effective government that truly serves the needs of its constituents. In conclusion, while officialdom is an integral part of our societal structure, it is crucial to recognize both its potential benefits and pitfalls. Striking a balance between maintaining order and fostering innovation is key to improving the relationship between officials and the public. By understanding the dynamics of officialdom, we can work towards a more efficient and accountable system that enhances the democratic process and empowers citizens to play an active role in shaping their communities.

在当今社会，officialdom的概念常常在各种背景下被讨论，特别是在治理和官僚制度方面。officialdom指的是政府或组织中负责做出决策和实施政策的官员或权威的集体。这一术语可以引发一系列情感和看法，因为许多人在与政府机构互动时都经历过officialdom的积极和消极方面。 一方面，officialdom在维护社会秩序和结构中发挥着至关重要的作用。官员们的任务是维护法律、确保公共安全并为公民提供必要的服务。例如，当地政府官员努力管理资源、监督公共工程项目并解决社区需求。他们对服务公众的承诺可以显著改善居民的生活质量。从这个角度来看，officialdom可以被视为一个运作良好的民主制度的必要组成部分，在这里，民选代表和任命官员共同努力制定有利于公众的政策。 然而，officialdom这一术语也可能带有负面含义，通常与官僚主义、繁文缛节和低效相关。许多人在与政府机构打交道时遇到过令人沮丧的经历，在这些情况下，冗长的流程和严格的程序可能会阻碍进展。officialdom的这一方面可能导致公民感到失望，他们可能会觉得自己的声音没有被听到，或者他们的关注被忽视。officialdom被视为一个冷漠且反应迟缓的实体，可能会加剧对政府机构的日益不信任。 此外，officialdom的影响不仅限于政府官员的行为；它还包括渗透到官僚环境中的文化和心态。在许多情况下，官员可能会优先考虑遵循规则和规定，而不是创新和响应公众的需求。这可能会抑制创造力，并阻止主动解决问题，从而导致系统的停滞。因此，针对officialdom的改革呼声往往遭到抵制，因为既得利益寻求维持现状。 为了解决这些挑战，公民积极参与officialdom是至关重要的。倡导、公众参与以及官员与社区之间的开放对话可以促进更具协作性的治理方式。通过追究官员的责任并要求透明度，个人可以帮助重塑与officialdom相关的认知和实践。这种参与可以导致一个更具响应性和有效性的政府，真正满足其选民的需求。 总之，虽然officialdom是我们社会结构中不可或缺的一部分，但认识到其潜在的好处和陷阱至关重要。在维护秩序与促进创新之间取得平衡是改善官员与公众关系的关键。通过理解officialdom的动态，我们可以朝着一个更高效和负责任的系统迈进，从而增强民主过程，并使公民能够积极参与塑造他们的社区。