officialism

简明释义

英[əˈfɪʃəlˌɪzəm]美[əˈfɪʃəˌlɪzəm]

n. 官僚作风；文牍主义；（总称）官员

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.So, how to keep the two features should be emphasized in the process of constructing Chinese Officialism institution.

所以，如何保持两种特性应该成为中国公务员制度建设的题中之意。

2.So, how to keep the two features should be emphasized in the process of constructing Chinese Officialism institution.

所以，如何保持两种特性应该成为中国公务员制度建设的题中之意。

3.The new policy was criticized for its tendency towards officialism, which stifles creativity and innovation.

这项新政策因其倾向于官僚主义而受到批评，这抑制了创造力和创新。

4.In many organizations, officialism can lead to unnecessary bureaucracy that slows down decision-making.

在许多组织中，官僚主义可能导致不必要的官僚作风，从而减缓决策速度。

5.The committee's report was filled with officialism, making it difficult for the public to understand.

委员会的报告充满了官僚主义，使公众难以理解。

6.To combat officialism, the company adopted a more flexible management style.

为了抗击官僚主义，公司采用了更灵活的管理风格。

7.Critics argue that officialism in government leads to inefficiency and waste of resources.

批评者认为，政府中的官僚主义导致低效率和资源浪费。

作文

In today's rapidly evolving world, the concept of governance is being scrutinized more than ever. One term that often comes up in discussions about bureaucratic systems is officialism. 官方主义 refers to an excessive reliance on official rules and procedures, often leading to inefficiency and a lack of responsiveness to the needs of the public. This phenomenon can be observed in various sectors, including government institutions, corporations, and non-profit organizations. To understand the implications of officialism, we must first recognize its roots. In many cases, 官方主义 arises from a desire for order and predictability in complex environments. Organizations develop strict protocols to ensure that operations run smoothly and that employees adhere to established norms. While this approach may have its benefits, it often stifles creativity and innovation. Employees may feel constrained by rigid guidelines that do not allow for flexibility or adaptation to changing circumstances. Moreover, officialism can lead to a disconnect between decision-makers and the people they serve. When bureaucracies prioritize adherence to rules over understanding the real needs of their constituents, they risk becoming out of touch. For example, in public service sectors such as healthcare or education, an overemphasis on procedural compliance can result in services that fail to meet the actual needs of the community. Patients may experience delays in care due to bureaucratic red tape, while students may find themselves lost in a system that prioritizes standardized testing over personalized learning experiences. The impact of officialism is not limited to public institutions. In the corporate world, companies that become too entrenched in their policies may struggle to respond to market changes or customer feedback. A culture that prioritizes strict adherence to rules can create an environment where employees are hesitant to propose new ideas or challenge the status quo. This resistance to change can ultimately hinder a company’s growth and adaptability in a competitive marketplace. Addressing the challenges posed by officialism requires a cultural shift within organizations. Leaders must recognize the importance of balancing structure with flexibility. Encouraging open communication and fostering an environment where employees feel empowered to share their insights can help mitigate the negative effects of 官方主义. By valuing input from all levels of an organization, leaders can create a more responsive and innovative workplace. Furthermore, organizations should regularly evaluate their policies and procedures to identify areas where officialism may be hindering progress. Streamlining processes and eliminating unnecessary bureaucracy can lead to improved efficiency and a greater ability to respond to the needs of stakeholders. Emphasizing outcomes rather than merely following procedures can also shift the focus toward achieving tangible results that benefit the community or market. In conclusion, while officialism may arise from a desire for order and control, it is essential to recognize its potential drawbacks. By fostering a culture of flexibility, open communication, and continuous evaluation, organizations can combat the stagnation that often accompanies 官方主义. Ultimately, the goal should be to create systems that are both efficient and responsive, ensuring that the needs of individuals and communities are met in an ever-changing world.

在当今快速发展的世界中，治理的概念比以往任何时候都受到更多的审视。一个经常出现在关于官僚制度讨论中的术语是officialism。官方主义指的是对官方规则和程序的过度依赖，这往往导致低效和缺乏对公众需求的响应。这一现象可以在各个领域观察到，包括政府机构、公司和非营利组织。 要理解officialism的影响，我们首先必须认识到它的根源。在许多情况下，官方主义源于对复杂环境中秩序和可预测性的渴望。组织制定严格的协议，以确保运营顺利进行，并且员工遵循既定规范。虽然这种方法可能有其好处，但它往往扼杀创造力和创新。员工可能会感到受制于僵化的指导方针，而这些指导方针不允许灵活性或适应变化的环境。 此外，officialism可能导致决策者与他们服务的人民之间的脱节。当官僚机构优先考虑遵守规则而不是理解其选民的实际需求时，他们就有可能变得脱离现实。例如，在公共服务部门，如医疗保健或教育，过度强调程序合规可能导致服务未能满足社区的实际需求。由于官僚主义的繁文缛节，患者可能经历延迟护理，而学生可能发现自己在一个优先考虑标准化测试而非个性化学习体验的系统中迷失。 officialism的影响不限于公共机构。在企业界，过于沉迷于政策的公司可能难以应对市场变化或客户反馈。优先遵循严格规则的文化可能会创造一种环境，使员工不敢提出新想法或挑战现状。这种对变化的抵制最终可能阻碍公司的增长和在竞争市场中的适应能力。 解决officialism带来的挑战需要组织内部的文化转变。领导者必须认识到平衡结构与灵活性的重要性。鼓励开放沟通并营造一种员工感到有权分享见解的环境，可以帮助减轻官方主义的负面影响。通过重视来自组织各级的意见，领导者可以创造一个更具响应性和创新性的工作场所。 此外，组织应该定期评估其政策和程序，以识别可能阻碍进展的officialism领域。简化流程和消除不必要的官僚主义可以提高效率，并增强对利益相关者需求的响应能力。强调结果而不仅仅是遵循程序，也可以将重点转向实现有利于社区或市场的切实成果。 总之，尽管officialism可能源于对秩序和控制的渴望，但认识到其潜在缺点至关重要。通过培养灵活性、开放沟通和持续评估的文化，组织可以对抗通常伴随官方主义而来的停滞。最终，目标应该是创建既高效又具有响应性的系统，确保在不断变化的世界中满足个人和社区的需求。