offsetting

简明释义

英[ˈɔfˌsɛtɪŋ]美[ˈɔfˌsɛtɪŋ]

v. 抵消；弥补；使偏离直线；（墨水）转印下一页（offset 的现在分词）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Those measures together would add perhaps 0.5% of GDP to the deficit, partly offsetting the squeeze on current spending.

这些措施结合起来可使GDP增加约0.5%，可以部分的抵消因财政紧缩而产生的经常性支出的赤字。

2.Pay in child care tends to be low, so the offsetting factor is not very great.

照料孩子的工资是低的，因此抵消因素并不是很大。

3.What about individual carbon offsetting projects?

个人碳补偿计划有用吗？

4.Dealers could benefit from an increase in trading volume, offsetting tighter margins.

交易商可能从交易量的上升中获益，从而弥补了收窄的利润率。

5.Today, some environmentalists are denouncing the “offsetting” of carbon emissions in similar terms.

如今，一些环保主义者谴责“抵消”碳排放，这种行为与前者相似。

6.The final step is 'offsetting'.

最后一步就是发单日期倒算。

7.The company is investing in renewable energy projects as a way of offsetting their carbon emissions.

该公司正在投资可再生能源项目，以此方式来抵消他们的碳排放。

8.To reduce the impact of our travel, we are offsetting our flights with tree planting initiatives.

为了减少我们旅行的影响，我们通过植树计划来抵消我们的航班。

9.The government introduced tax incentives for businesses that are offsetting their environmental footprint.

政府为那些在抵消其环境足迹的企业引入了税收激励措施。

10.By purchasing carbon credits, individuals can contribute to offsetting their personal carbon footprint.

通过购买碳信用，个人可以帮助抵消他们的个人碳足迹。

11.The hotel chain is committed to offsetting its energy consumption through various sustainability programs.

该酒店连锁致力于通过各种可持续发展项目来抵消其能源消耗。

作文

In recent years, the concept of sustainability has gained significant traction, prompting individuals and organizations to explore various ways to reduce their environmental impact. One such method is through offsetting (抵消), which involves compensating for carbon emissions or other negative environmental effects by investing in projects that promote ecological balance. This practice is becoming increasingly popular as people recognize the urgent need to address climate change and protect our planet for future generations. The idea behind offsetting (抵消) is relatively straightforward. For every ton of carbon dioxide emitted, an equivalent amount can be 'offset' by supporting renewable energy projects, reforestation initiatives, or other environmentally friendly practices. For instance, a company that emits greenhouse gases during its operations might choose to invest in tree planting projects that absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. By doing so, they can claim to be 'carbon neutral' or even 'climate positive' if they offset more emissions than they produce. However, the effectiveness of offsetting (抵消) has been a topic of debate. Critics argue that it allows companies and individuals to continue polluting without making meaningful changes to their behavior. They contend that relying on offsetting (抵消) can create a false sense of security, leading to complacency in adopting sustainable practices. Therefore, while offsetting (抵消) can play a role in mitigating environmental damage, it should not be seen as a substitute for reducing emissions at the source. Moreover, the credibility of offsetting (抵消) projects is crucial. Not all carbon credits are created equal, and some projects may not deliver the promised environmental benefits. For example, a reforestation project might fail due to poor management or natural disasters, rendering the offsets ineffective. Thus, it is essential for individuals and businesses to thoroughly research and choose reputable offsetting (抵消) programs that adhere to strict standards and guidelines. In addition to carbon offsetting (抵消), there are other forms of environmental compensation that can be considered. For instance, biodiversity offsetting (抵消) aims to counterbalance the loss of natural habitats by creating or restoring ecosystems elsewhere. This approach seeks to ensure that development projects do not come at the expense of biodiversity loss, thereby promoting a more sustainable coexistence between human activities and nature. As we continue to grapple with the realities of climate change, the role of offsetting (抵消) will likely evolve. It is important for policymakers, businesses, and individuals to engage in meaningful discussions about how to integrate offsetting (抵消) into broader sustainability strategies. By combining offsetting (抵消) efforts with direct emission reductions and sustainable practices, we can work towards a more balanced relationship with our environment. In conclusion, offsetting (抵消) represents a valuable tool in the fight against climate change. While it is not a panacea, it offers a way to take responsibility for our actions and support projects that benefit the planet. As we move forward, it is essential to approach offsetting (抵消) with a critical eye and a commitment to genuine sustainability, ensuring that we leave a healthier world for future generations.

近年来，可持续发展的概念获得了显著关注，促使个人和组织探索各种减少环境影响的方法。其中一种方法是通过抵消（offsetting），这涉及通过投资促进生态平衡的项目来补偿碳排放或其他负面环境影响。这种做法越来越受欢迎，因为人们认识到迫切需要应对气候变化并保护我们的星球，以便为未来的世代提供保障。 抵消（offsetting）的理念相对简单。每排放一吨二氧化碳，可以通过支持可再生能源项目、再造林计划或其他环保实践来“抵消”相等的数量。例如，一家在运营过程中排放温室气体的公司可能会选择投资于吸收大气中二氧化碳的植树项目。通过这样做，他们可以声称自己是“碳中和”甚至“气候积极”的，如果他们抵消的排放量超过他们产生的排放量。 然而，抵消（offsetting）的有效性一直是一个争论的话题。批评者认为，这使公司和个人能够继续污染，而不采取有意义的行为改变。他们认为，依赖抵消（offsetting）可能会造成一种虚假的安全感，导致在采用可持续实践方面的自满。因此，尽管抵消（offsetting）可以在减轻环境损害方面发挥作用，但它不应被视为减少源头排放的替代品。 此外，抵消（offsetting）项目的可信度至关重要。并非所有的碳信用都具有相同的价值，一些项目可能无法实现承诺的环境效益。例如，一个再造林项目可能由于管理不善或自然灾害而失败，从而使抵消失效。因此，个人和企业在选择信誉良好的抵消（offsetting）项目时，必须进行全面的研究，并选择遵循严格标准和指南的项目。 除了碳抵消（offsetting），还有其他形式的环境补偿可以考虑。例如，生物多样性抵消（offsetting）旨在通过在其他地方创建或恢复生态系统来抵消自然栖息地的损失。这种方法旨在确保开发项目不会以生物多样性丧失为代价，从而促进人类活动与自然之间更可持续的共存。 随着我们继续应对气候变化的现实，抵消（offsetting）的角色可能会不断演变。政策制定者、企业和个人必须参与有关如何将抵消（offsetting）纳入更广泛的可持续发展战略的有意义讨论。通过将抵消（offsetting）工作与直接减少排放和可持续实践相结合，我们可以朝着与环境更平衡的关系努力。 总之，抵消（offsetting）代表了在抗击气候变化中一种有价值的工具。虽然它不是灵丹妙药，但它提供了一种对我们行为负责并支持有益于地球的项目的方法。在未来的发展中，重要的是以批判的眼光和对真正可持续性的承诺来对待抵消（offsetting），确保我们为未来的世代留下一个更健康的世界。