onymous

简明释义

英[ˈɒnɪməs]美[ˈɒnɪməs]

adj. 署名的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Articles in magazines are usually onymous.

杂志上的文章通常都是署名的。

2.Articles in magazines are usually onymous.

杂志上的文章通常都是署名的。

3.The author chose to remain onymous 无名的 to protect their privacy.

作者选择保持无名的 onymous以保护他们的隐私。

4.In the world of online forums, many users prefer to stay onymous 无名的 to express their true opinions without fear.

在在线论坛的世界中，许多用户更喜欢保持无名的 onymous，以便真实表达他们的观点而不必担心。

5.The onymous 无名的 feedback from customers helped the company improve its services.

顾客的无名的 onymous反馈帮助公司改进了服务。

6.She wrote an onymous 无名的 letter to the editor expressing her concerns.

她给编辑写了一封无名的 onymous信，表达了她的担忧。

7.An onymous 无名的 source provided the journalist with crucial information.

一位无名的 onymous消息来源为记者提供了重要信息。

作文

In the world of literature and academia, the concept of being onymous often plays a crucial role in how we perceive authorship and the value of a written work. The term onymous refers to works that are attributed to a specific author, as opposed to anonymous works where the authorship is unknown. This distinction can significantly affect how readers approach a text and the weight they give to its content. For instance, when we read a novel by a renowned author like Jane Austen, we are not only engaging with the story but also with Austen's unique voice, style, and perspective. Her name carries with it a legacy of literary excellence that influences our interpretation of her work. In contrast, an onymous piece might not evoke the same level of engagement or critical analysis simply because there is no known author to lend credibility or authority to the text. The implications of onymity extend beyond literature into other fields such as journalism and academia. In journalism, articles that are onymous often carry more weight than those that are not, as readers tend to trust pieces attributed to reputable journalists. In academic writing, citations from onymous sources are typically regarded as more credible, as the author's expertise can be assessed based on their previous work. This creates a hierarchy of knowledge where onymous authors are often given precedence over their anonymous counterparts. However, the value of onymous works is not always straightforward. There are instances where anonymity can enhance the impact of a message. For example, consider the works of political dissidents who choose to remain anonymous to protect themselves from persecution. In such cases, the message may resonate more powerfully when the author is not revealed, allowing readers to focus solely on the content rather than the author's identity. Furthermore, the rise of the internet has blurred the lines between onymous and anonymous authorship. Many online platforms encourage user-generated content where individuals can share their thoughts without revealing their identities. This phenomenon raises questions about the reliability and authenticity of information, as readers must navigate a landscape filled with both onymous and anonymous contributions. Ultimately, understanding the distinction between onymous and anonymous works allows us to appreciate the nuances of authorship and the complexities of how we engage with texts. While onymous works can provide a sense of trust and authority, anonymous works can offer a unique perspective that challenges conventional thinking. As readers, it is essential to consider these dynamics as we explore various forms of writing and the intentions behind them. In conclusion, the term onymous, which signifies works attributed to identifiable authors, plays a significant role in shaping our perceptions of literature, journalism, and academia. By recognizing the importance of authorship, we can better understand the context and value of the texts we encounter every day. Whether we are drawn to the credibility of onymous works or intrigued by the mystery of anonymous writings, both contribute to the rich tapestry of human expression and knowledge.

在文学和学术的世界中，onymous 这一概念往往在我们如何看待作者身份和书面作品的价值方面发挥着至关重要的作用。onymous 这个术语指的是那些被特定作者归属的作品，与匿名作品相对，后者的作者身份不明。这一区别可能会显著影响读者对文本的理解以及他们赋予其内容的分量。 例如，当我们阅读著名作家简·奥斯汀的小说时，我们不仅是在接触故事本身，还在与奥斯汀独特的声音、风格和视角进行互动。她的名字承载着文学卓越的遗产，这影响了我们对她作品的解读。相比之下，一篇onymous 的作品可能不会引发同样程度的参与或批判分析，仅仅因为没有已知的作者来赋予文本可信度或权威性。 onymity 的含义不仅限于文学，还扩展到新闻和学术等其他领域。在新闻报道中，onymous 的文章通常比那些没有署名的文章更具分量，因为读者倾向于信任那些归属于声誉良好的记者的报道。在学术写作中，来自onymous 来源的引用通常被视为更可靠，因为可以根据作者的先前工作评估其专业知识。这就造成了一种知识的等级制度，其中onymous 作者通常被优先考虑，而不是他们的匿名同行。 然而，onymous 作品的价值并非总是简单明了。有些情况下，匿名性可能增强信息的影响力。例如，考虑那些选择保持匿名以保护自己免受迫害的政治异议人士的作品。在这种情况下，当作者身份未被揭示时，信息可能会更有力地引起共鸣，使读者能够专注于内容而非作者的身份。 此外，互联网的兴起模糊了onymous 和匿名作者身份之间的界限。许多在线平台鼓励用户生成内容，个人可以在不透露身份的情况下分享自己的想法。这一现象引发了关于信息可靠性和真实性的问题，因为读者必须在充满onymous 和匿名贡献的环境中导航。 最终，理解onymous 与匿名作品之间的区别使我们能够欣赏作者身份的细微差别以及我们与文本互动的复杂性。虽然onymous 作品可以提供信任和权威感，但匿名作品也可以提供一种独特的视角，挑战传统思维。作为读者，考虑这些动态在我们探索各种写作形式及其背后的意图时至关重要。 总之，onymous 这一术语意味着归属于可识别作者的作品，在塑造我们对文学、新闻和学术的看法方面发挥着重要作用。通过认识到作者身份的重要性，我们可以更好地理解我们每天遇到的文本的背景和价值。无论我们是被onymous 作品的可信度所吸引，还是被匿名著作的神秘性所吸引，这两者都为人类表达和知识的丰富织锦做出了贡献。