outlawry

简明释义

英[ˈaʊtlɔːrɪ]美[ˈaʊtˌlɔːri]

n. 被宣布为非法；非法化；逍遥法外

复 数 o u t l a w r i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.It was from the chaos and outlawry of this time that the legend of Robin Hood was probably born.

就是这段战乱与放逐齐飞的年代，罗宾汉的传奇诞生了。

2.It was from the chaos and outlawry of this time that the legend of Robin Hood was probably born.

就是这段战乱与放逐齐飞的年代，罗宾汉的传奇诞生了。

3.The reason for this swirl of maritime outlawry can be found on the nearest shore, in Somalia.

这个海上非法漩涡的成因可以在最近的陆地上找到，那就是索马里。

4.The reason for this swirl of maritime outlawry can be found on the nearest shore.

造成这种海上流亡者漩涡的原因可以在最近的岸上找到。

5.The government declared a state of emergency, leading to the outlawry 不法状态 of certain groups.

政府宣布进入紧急状态，导致某些团体处于不法状态。

6.In medieval times, outlawry 被剥夺法律保护 meant that a person could be killed without consequence.

在中世纪，被剥夺法律保护意味着一个人可以在没有后果的情况下被杀。

7.The judge's ruling resulted in the outlawry 不法行为 of the defendant, stripping them of their rights.

法官的裁决导致被告的不法行为，剥夺了他们的权利。

8.The act of outlawry 被宣告为非法 is often used as a last resort against criminals.

对罪犯而言，被宣告为非法的行为通常被视为最后手段。

9.Many feared the consequences of outlawry 被剥夺法律保护 in their community.

许多人害怕在他们的社区中遭遇被剥夺法律保护的后果。

作文

The concept of outlawry has existed for centuries, serving as a means to address individuals who have committed serious crimes or transgressions against societal norms. In historical contexts, outlawry referred to the legal status of being declared an outlaw, which meant that the individual was outside the protection of the law. This status not only stripped the person of their rights but also allowed anyone to harm or kill them without facing legal repercussions. The implications of outlawry were severe, often leading to violence and further criminal activities. In medieval Europe, for instance, a person could be declared an outlaw for various offenses, ranging from theft to treason. Once labeled as such, they were essentially marked for death. Society viewed outlaws as pariahs, and this stigma often led to a cycle of violence and desperation. Many outlaws resorted to banditry or joining groups of other outlaws, creating a subculture that thrived on rebellion against the established order. This phenomenon illustrates how outlawry can perpetuate crime rather than eliminate it, as individuals pushed to the fringes of society may feel they have no choice but to engage in illegal activities for survival. In modern times, the term outlawry has evolved, yet its essence remains relevant. While we may not declare individuals as outlaws in the same formal manner, the underlying principles persist. People who commit heinous acts, such as terrorism or organized crime, may be labeled as outlaws by society. This labeling can lead to a similar ostracization, where the individual becomes a target for law enforcement and vigilante justice alike. Moreover, the implications of outlawry extend beyond the individual. Communities affected by crime often rally together to combat the perceived threat. This can lead to a heightened sense of fear and mistrust, resulting in a social atmosphere where normal interactions are overshadowed by suspicion. In such environments, the concept of justice can become distorted, as the line between lawful action and vigilantism blurs. The historical context of outlawry also raises important questions about justice and morality. When someone is declared an outlaw, society often feels justified in taking extreme measures against them. However, this raises ethical dilemmas: Is it right to deny an individual their basic rights? Can society truly claim to uphold justice while simultaneously sanctioning violence against those deemed outlaws? These questions challenge our understanding of law and order and highlight the complexities of human behavior. In conclusion, outlawry serves as a powerful reminder of the consequences of societal rejection and the cyclical nature of crime and punishment. Whether in historical or contemporary contexts, the implications of being labeled an outlaw can lead to violence, social division, and moral quandaries. As we reflect on the concept of outlawry, it is crucial to consider how we address crime and justice in our societies, striving for solutions that promote rehabilitation rather than further alienation. Only by understanding the roots and ramifications of outlawry can we hope to create a more just and equitable world.

‘outlawry’的概念存在了几个世纪，作为一种解决严重犯罪或违反社会规范的个人的手段。在历史背景下，‘outlawry’指的是被宣告为亡命之徒的法律地位，这意味着该个人不再受到法律的保护。这一地位不仅剥夺了个人的权利，还允许任何人对其进行伤害或杀害，而无需承担法律后果。‘outlawry’的影响是严重的，往往导致暴力和进一步的犯罪活动。 例如，在中世纪的欧洲，一个人可能因为各种罪行而被宣告为亡命之徒，从盗窃到叛国不等。一旦被标记为这样的身份，他们基本上就被判处死刑。社会将亡命之徒视为贱民，这种污名往往导致暴力和绝望的循环。许多亡命之徒不得不诉诸抢劫或加入其他亡命之徒的团体，创造出一种在反抗既定秩序的亚文化。这一现象说明了‘outlawry’如何延续犯罪而不是消除它，因为被推向社会边缘的个人可能会感到别无选择，只能从事非法活动以求生存。 在现代，‘outlawry’这一术语已经演变，但其本质依然相关。虽然我们可能不会以同样的正式方式宣告个人为亡命之徒，但潜在的原则依然存在。那些实施可怕行为的人，比如恐怖主义或有组织犯罪，可能会被社会标记为亡命之徒。这种标记可能导致类似的排斥，个体成为执法和私刑正义的目标。 此外，‘outlawry’的影响不仅限于个体。受犯罪影响的社区往往团结起来对抗感知到的威胁。这可能导致恐惧和不信任感加剧，形成一种社会氛围，其中正常的互动被怀疑所遮蔽。在这样的环境中，正义的概念可能会扭曲，因为合法行动与私刑之间的界限模糊。 ‘outlawry’的历史背景也引发了关于正义和道德的重要问题。当某人被宣告为亡命之徒时，社会常常感到有理由对其采取极端措施。然而，这引发了伦理困境：剥夺一个人基本权利是否正确？社会真的能在同时制裁对被认为是亡命之徒的暴力的情况下声称维护正义吗？这些问题挑战了我们对法律和秩序的理解，并突显了人类行为的复杂性。 总之，‘outlawry’是对社会拒绝后果和犯罪与惩罚循环的有力提醒。无论是在历史还是当代背景下，被标记为亡命之徒的影响都可能导致暴力、社会分裂和道德困境。当我们反思‘outlawry’的概念时，考虑我们如何在社会中处理犯罪和正义至关重要，努力寻求促进康复而非进一步孤立的解决方案。只有通过理解‘outlawry’的根源和后果，我们才能希望创造一个更加公正和平等的世界。