overturned

简明释义

英[ˌəʊvəˈtɜːnd]美[ˌovərˈtɜːrn]

adj. 倾覆的，倒转的

v. 颠覆（overturn 的过去式）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Alex jumped up so violently that he overturned his glass of wine.

亚历克斯跃起得太猛，以至于打翻了他的那杯葡萄酒。

2.It overturned the rational tradition that had been built upon since the Renaissance.

它颠覆了自文艺复兴以来建立的理性传统。

3.The cart overturned and precipitated us to the ditch.

车子翻了，我们被摔进了沟里。

4.The bus overturned and fell into a ravine.

这辆公共汽车翻了车，掉进了一处深谷。

5.The cart overturned and precipitated us to the ditch.

车子翻了，我们被摔进了沟里。

6.In 2006 a circuit court overturned the conviction.

2006年，巡回法庭更改了早前的判决。

7.It overturned all of those habits of mind, fundamentally changing our experience of the world, affecting the conduct of politics, religion, business, and culture.

它颠覆了所有这些思维习惯，从根本上改变了我们对世界的体验，影响了政治、宗教、商业和文化的行为。

8.In a rare unanimous ruling, the US Supreme Court has overturned the corruption conviction of a former Virginia governor, Robert McDonnell.

在一项罕见的一致裁决中，美国最高法院推翻了对弗吉尼亚州前州长罗伯特·麦克唐纳的腐败罪判决。

9.Goodwin tried to have the court ruling overturned.

古德温试图推翻法院的裁决。

10.The judge overturned the previous ruling, allowing the case to proceed.

法官推翻了之前的裁决，允许案件继续进行。

11.The car overturned during the storm, causing a major traffic jam.

在暴风雨中，汽车翻车，导致了严重的交通堵塞。

12.The committee overturned their decision after receiving new evidence.

委员会在收到新证据后推翻了他们的决定。

13.The protesters demanded that the law be overturned due to its unfairness.

抗议者要求由于法律的不公而被推翻。

14.After the investigation, the findings overturned the previous assumptions.

调查后，结果推翻了之前的假设。

作文

In recent years, the concept of justice has been a focal point in various societies. One of the most significant events that highlighted this issue was when a controversial court ruling was overturned (推翻) by a higher court. This incident not only sparked widespread protests but also ignited discussions about the integrity of our legal systems. The case in question involved a well-known figure who was accused of serious crimes. Initially, the lower court found him guilty, and many believed that justice had been served. However, as more evidence came to light, it became clear that the ruling may have been hasty. The higher court decided to review the case, and after thorough deliberations, they overturned (推翻) the previous decision, citing insufficient evidence and procedural errors during the trial. This overturned (推翻) ruling not only affected the life of the accused but also raised questions about the reliability of the judicial process. People began to wonder how many other cases might have been wrongly decided. Legal experts emphasized the importance of due process and the need for a system that can rectify its mistakes. This situation serves as a reminder that the law is not infallible, and sometimes, it requires intervention to correct its course. Moreover, the public reaction to the overturned (推翻) ruling was mixed. While some celebrated the decision as a victory for justice and fairness, others were outraged, feeling that it undermined the original verdict. This division highlighted the complexities of public opinion regarding legal matters. Some argued that the overturned (推翻) judgment set a dangerous precedent, suggesting that high-profile individuals could evade consequences due to their status. In response to the fallout from this case, lawmakers proposed reforms aimed at enhancing transparency and accountability within the judicial system. They recognized that for the public to trust the legal process, there must be mechanisms in place to address potential errors. This proposal included measures to ensure that all evidence is thoroughly examined before a final ruling is made, thereby reducing the likelihood of future overturned (推翻) decisions. As society continues to grapple with issues of justice and fairness, the implications of the overturned (推翻) ruling will undoubtedly resonate for years to come. It serves as a poignant reminder of the delicate balance between law and morality. In an ideal world, the legal system would operate flawlessly, delivering justice without error. However, the reality is that mistakes happen, and it is crucial for there to be a framework that allows for corrections. In conclusion, the overturned (推翻) ruling in this high-profile case has sparked essential conversations about the nature of justice and the importance of a fair legal process. It encourages us to reflect on how we view the law and the individuals who interpret it. As we move forward, it is imperative that we advocate for a judicial system that not only seeks to uphold the law but also ensures that justice is served equitably for all individuals, regardless of their status or background.

近年来，正义的概念在各个社会中成为了焦点。其中最重要的事件之一是，当一项有争议的法院裁决被更高法院推翻（overturned）时。这一事件不仅引发了广泛的抗议，还激发了关于我们法律体系完整性的讨论。此案涉及一位知名人士，他被指控犯有严重罪行。最初，低级法院判定他有罪，许多人认为正义得到了伸张。然而，随着更多证据浮出水面，显然这一裁决可能过于仓促。高级法院决定重新审查此案，经过充分的审议，他们推翻（overturned）了之前的决定，理由是证据不足和审判过程中的程序错误。 这一推翻（overturned）裁决不仅影响了被告的生活，也引发了关于司法过程可靠性的问题。人们开始思考还有多少其他案件可能被错误裁决。法律专家强调了正当程序的重要性，以及需要一个能够纠正其错误的系统。这种情况提醒我们，法律并非无懈可击，有时需要干预来纠正其方向。 此外，公众对这一推翻（overturned）裁决的反应也是复杂的。虽然一些人将这一决定视为正义和公平的胜利，但另一些人则感到愤怒，认为这削弱了原判决的有效性。这种分歧突显了公众对法律事务复杂的看法。一些人认为，这一推翻（overturned）判决设立了一个危险的先例，暗示高调人物可以逃避责任，因为他们的地位。 为了应对这一案件的后果，立法者提出了旨在增强司法系统透明度和问责制的改革。他们认识到，为了让公众信任法律程序，必须建立机制来解决潜在的错误。这项提案包括确保在作出最终裁决之前，所有证据都经过彻底审查，从而减少未来发生推翻（overturned）裁决的可能性。 随着社会继续努力解决正义与公平的问题，这一推翻（overturned）裁决的影响无疑将在未来几年内引起共鸣。它提醒我们法律与道德之间的微妙平衡。在理想的世界中，法律系统将完美运作，毫无错误地实现正义。然而，现实是错误会发生，至关重要的是要有一个允许纠正错误的框架。 总之，这一高调案件中的推翻（overturned）裁决引发了关于正义本质和公平法律程序重要性的基本对话。它鼓励我们反思我们如何看待法律以及解释法律的个人。展望未来，我们必须倡导一个不仅寻求维护法律，而且确保对所有个人，无论其地位或背景如何，公正地实现正义的司法系统。