pablum

简明释义

英[ˈpæbləm]美[ˈpæbləm]

n. 婴儿麦片食品；平淡而无味的文章或思想

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Life went on, and when Markus was six months old, Brooks fed him his first food: a pablum containing dairy products.

生活还在继续，当马库斯六个月大时，布鲁克斯喂他断奶后的第一份食物：含有乳制品的婴儿麦片。

2.Life went on, and when Markus was six months old, Brooks fed him his first food: a pablum containing dairy products.

生活还在继续，当马库斯六个月大时，布鲁克斯喂他断奶后的第一份食物：含有乳制品的婴儿麦片。

3.The movie was criticized for its lack of depth, with many calling it mere pablum.

这部电影因缺乏深度而受到批评，许多人称其为单纯的幼稚内容。

4.His speech was filled with pablum, failing to address any real issues.

他的演讲充满了空洞的说辞，未能解决任何实际问题。

5.Critics argue that the book offers nothing but pablum for the masses.

评论家们认为这本书不过是给大众提供了无聊的内容。

6.The television show was nothing more than pablum for children.

这个电视节目无非是给孩子们提供的幼稚内容。

7.Many politicians resort to pablum in their speeches to avoid controversy.

许多政治家在演讲中使用无实质内容以避免争议。

作文

In today’s world, where information is abundant and easily accessible, the quality of what we consume has become a significant topic of discussion. Many people find themselves inundated with content that lacks depth and substance. This phenomenon can often be described using the term pablum, which refers to bland or insipid intellectual fare that fails to stimulate thought or provoke meaningful discussion. It is essential to recognize how pablum can infiltrate various forms of media, including television, literature, and even social media platforms. To illustrate the impact of pablum on our society, consider the realm of television. Reality shows have gained immense popularity over the past two decades, often showcasing superficial interactions and trivial conflicts among participants. While these shows may provide entertainment, they frequently serve as examples of pablum, offering little in the way of intellectual engagement or cultural enrichment. Viewers may find themselves captivated by the drama, yet this engagement does not encourage critical thinking or personal growth. Instead, it fosters a culture of passivity, where audiences consume content without questioning its value or implications. Similarly, the literary world is not exempt from the influence of pablum. Bestselling novels often prioritize commercial success over literary merit, leading to the publication of books that are formulaic and devoid of original insight. These works may sell millions of copies, but they often fail to challenge readers or inspire them to explore new ideas. The prevalence of such pablum in literature raises concerns about the future of reading as an intellectually stimulating activity. If readers continually gravitate towards easy-to-digest narratives, they may miss out on the transformative power of more complex and thought-provoking literature. Social media platforms also contribute to the spread of pablum. With the rise of short-form content, such as tweets and Instagram posts, meaningful discourse has been replaced by sound bites and memes that prioritize virality over substance. Users often share content that resonates on a surface level, but this quick consumption rarely leads to deeper reflection or conversation. As a result, the potential for genuine connection and understanding is diminished, leaving a void filled with pablum rather than enriching dialogue. Despite the challenges posed by pablum, there are ways to combat its pervasive influence. One approach is to seek out and support creators who prioritize quality over quantity. By engaging with content that challenges our perspectives and encourages critical thinking, we can foster a culture that values depth and substance. Additionally, promoting media literacy can empower individuals to discern between enriching content and pablum. Understanding the motives behind various forms of media can help consumers make informed choices about what they engage with. In conclusion, while pablum may seem harmless at first glance, its impact on our culture and intellect should not be underestimated. By recognizing its presence in our daily lives, we can take proactive steps to seek out more meaningful content and encourage deeper discussions. Ultimately, it is our responsibility as consumers to demand better from the media we consume, ensuring that we are not merely satisfied with pablum, but are instead challenged and inspired by the ideas we encounter.

在当今这个信息丰富且易于获取的世界中，我们所消费的内容质量已成为一个重要的话题。许多人发现自己被缺乏深度和实质内容的内容淹没。这种现象常常可以用“pablum”这个词来描述，它指的是平淡或无味的智力食粮，无法激发思考或引发有意义的讨论。认识到pablum如何渗透到电视、文学甚至社交媒体平台等各种媒体形式中是至关重要的。 为了说明pablum对我们社会的影响，可以考虑电视领域。在过去二十年里，真人秀节目获得了巨大的普及，通常展示参与者之间肤浅的互动和琐碎的冲突。虽然这些节目可能提供娱乐，但它们往往作为pablum的例子，几乎没有提供智力上的参与或文化上的丰富性。观众可能会被戏剧吸引，但这种参与并未鼓励批判性思维或个人成长。相反，它培养了一种消极的文化，观众在不质疑其价值或含义的情况下消费内容。 同样，文学界也未能逃脱pablum的影响。畅销小说往往优先考虑商业成功而非文学价值，导致出版出公式化且缺乏原创见解的书籍。这些作品可能销售数百万本，但它们往往无法挑战读者或激励他们探索新思想。此类pablum在文学中的普遍存在引发了人们对阅读作为一种智力刺激活动未来的担忧。如果读者持续倾向于易于消化的叙述，他们可能会错过更复杂和发人深省的文学作品所带来的变革力量。 社交媒体平台也助长了pablum的传播。随着短格式内容（如推文和Instagram帖子）的兴起，有意义的讨论已被优先考虑病毒传播而非实质内容的声音片段和表情包所取代。用户经常分享与表面相关的内容，但这种快速消费很少导致更深入的反思或对话。因此，真正的连接和理解的潜力被削弱，留下了充满pablum而非丰富对话的空白。 尽管pablum带来了挑战，但仍有方法可以对抗其普遍影响。一种方法是寻求并支持那些优先考虑质量而非数量的创作者。通过接触那些挑战我们视角并鼓励批判性思维的内容，我们可以培养一种重视深度和实质的文化。此外，促进媒体素养可以赋予个人辨别丰富内容与pablum之间差异的能力。了解各种媒体背后的动机可以帮助消费者做出明智的选择，决定他们接触的内容。 总之，虽然pablum乍看之下似乎无害，但其对我们文化和智力的影响不容小觑。通过认识到它在我们日常生活中的存在，我们可以采取主动措施寻求更有意义的内容并鼓励更深入的讨论。最终，作为消费者，我们有责任要求媒体提供更好的内容，确保我们不仅仅满足于pablum，而是被我们所接触的思想所挑战和激励。