pacifism

简明释义

英[ˈpæsɪfɪzəm]美[ˈpæsɪfɪzəm]

n. 和平主义；反战主义

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.He leaned to pacifism.

他倾向于和平主义。

2.The social ideals on peace of Confucianism, Mohism and Daoism are no doubt confirmed in the Oriental Pacifism.

儒家、墨家和道家的和平社会理想无疑都印证在东方和平主义的社会理想之中。

3.He didn't hide his pacifism.

他没有掩饰他的和平主义态度。

4.The pacifism of its electorally ruinous 1983 manifesto was renounced at every turn.

他在选举中提出了耗资巨大的1983宣言，其中的反战主义多次被宣布放弃。

5.We are to try for peace. This does not mean pacifism.

我们要努力谋求和平，但不代表和平主义。

6.This study strives to explore the harmony, integration and pacifism reflected in her new book the Fifth book of Peace.

本文研究汤的新作《第五和平书》中的和谐，融合以及和平主义思想。

7.Einstein says pacifism is the right creed therefore pacifism is the right creed. What have we don't know?

爱因斯坦说和平主义是正确信条，所以和平主义是正确的信条，我们不知道什么呢？

8.However, Gandhi's pacifism can be separated to some extent from his other teachings.

不过，甘地的和平主义可以在某种程度上与他的其它教导区分开来。

9.During the1960s American poet Robert Lowell having embraced pacifism refused to serve his country in vietnam. for this refusal he was sentenced to five months in prison.

一九六〇年代，美国诗人罗勃特·洛厄尔服膺和平主义，拒绝为国家到越南服役，被判入狱五个月。

10.Many activists advocate for pacifism 和平主义 as a means to resolve conflicts without violence.

许多活动家提倡通过和平主义 和平主义的方式来解决冲突，避免暴力。

11.The philosophy of pacifism 和平主义 often emphasizes the importance of dialogue over armed conflict.

和平主义 和平主义的哲学通常强调对话的重要性，而非武装冲突。

12.Her commitment to pacifism 和平主义 was evident in her refusal to support military actions.

她对和平主义 和平主义的承诺在于她拒绝支持军事行动。

13.The organization promotes pacifism 和平主义 through education and community outreach programs.

该组织通过教育和社区外展项目推广和平主义 和平主义。

14.During the protest, many participants carried signs advocating for pacifism 和平主义 and non-violent resistance.

在抗议活动中，许多参与者举着倡导和平主义 和平主义和非暴力抵抗的标语。

作文

The concept of pacifism has been a significant topic in philosophical and political discussions for centuries. At its core, pacifism is the belief that any form of violence or war is unjustifiable and that disputes should be settled through peaceful means. This ideology has gained traction especially during times of conflict, where the horrors of war have led many to question the morality of using violence to achieve political ends. Throughout history, numerous figures have championed pacifism. One of the most notable proponents was Mahatma Gandhi, who advocated for nonviolent resistance as a means to challenge British colonial rule in India. Gandhi's philosophy was rooted in the idea that true strength lies in the ability to endure suffering without retaliation. His approach not only contributed to India's independence but also inspired civil rights movements around the world, demonstrating the power of pacifism in enacting social change. Another prominent advocate of pacifism was Martin Luther King Jr., who drew heavily on Gandhi's principles during the American Civil Rights Movement. King believed that love and nonviolence were the most potent weapons against systemic racial injustice. His famous marches and speeches emphasized that violence only begets more violence, and that pacifism could lead to meaningful dialogue and ultimately, societal transformation. However, the practice of pacifism is not without its challenges. Critics argue that in certain situations, especially when faced with oppressive regimes or acts of aggression, pacifism can be seen as a form of weakness or inaction. They contend that sometimes, force may be necessary to protect innocent lives or to restore justice. This debate raises important questions about the effectiveness of pacifism in real-world scenarios. Despite these criticisms, many believe that pacifism remains a viable and essential approach to conflict resolution. In an increasingly interconnected world, where the consequences of violence can have far-reaching effects, the call for peaceful solutions is more relevant than ever. Movements advocating for pacifism today focus on dialogue, diplomacy, and understanding as means to resolve conflicts, emphasizing that sustainable peace can only be achieved when all parties are willing to listen and compromise. In conclusion, pacifism is a powerful ideology that challenges us to reconsider our responses to conflict. While it may not always provide clear answers in complex situations, its emphasis on nonviolence and dialogue offers a hopeful alternative to the cycles of violence that have plagued humanity for centuries. By embracing pacifism, we open the door to a future where peace is prioritized over aggression, and understanding triumphs over hatred.

‘和平主义’这一概念在哲学和政治讨论中已经成为一个重要的话题，已有几个世纪的历史。其核心理念是，任何形式的暴力或战争都是不可辩解的，争端应通过和平的方式解决。这一意识形态在冲突时期尤其受到重视，因为战争的恐怖使许多人质疑使用暴力来实现政治目标的道德性。 在历史上，许多人物都倡导过‘和平主义’。其中最著名的支持者之一是甘地，他主张非暴力抵抗作为挑战英国殖民统治的手段。甘地的哲学根植于这样的观点：真正的力量在于能够忍受痛苦而不进行报复。他的方法不仅为印度的独立做出了贡献，还激励了全球的民权运动，展示了‘和平主义’在推动社会变革中的力量。 另一位著名的‘和平主义’倡导者是马丁·路德·金，他在美国民权运动中深受甘地原则的影响。金认为，爱与非暴力是对抗系统性种族不公的最有力武器。他著名的游行和演讲强调，暴力只会导致更多的暴力，而‘和平主义’可以引导人们进行有意义的对话，并最终实现社会转型。 然而，‘和平主义’的实践并非没有挑战。批评者认为，在某些情况下，尤其是在面对压迫政权或侵略行为时，‘和平主义’可能被视为一种软弱或无所作为。他们认为，有时候，为了保护无辜生命或恢复正义，使用武力可能是必要的。这场辩论提出了关于‘和平主义’在现实情境中有效性的重大问题。 尽管存在这些批评，许多人仍然认为‘和平主义’是一种可行且至关重要的冲突解决方式。在这个日益相互联系的世界中，暴力的后果可能具有深远的影响，因此，寻求和平解决方案的呼声比以往任何时候都更具相关性。当今倡导‘和平主义’的运动专注于对话、外交和理解，强调只有当所有各方愿意倾听和妥协时，才能实现可持续的和平。 总之，‘和平主义’是一种强有力的意识形态，挑战我们重新思考对冲突的回应。虽然在复杂情况下，它可能并未提供明确的答案，但其对非暴力和对话的强调为人类几百年来困扰的暴力循环提供了一个充满希望的替代方案。通过接受‘和平主义’，我们为一个将和平置于侵略之上、理解战胜仇恨的未来打开了大门。