partisans

简明释义

英[ˈpɑːtɪzənz]美[ˈpɑrtɪzənz]

n. 游击队员（partisan 的复数形式）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.He was rescued by some Italian partisans.

他被一些意大利游击队员救了。

2.A year later, in 1944, his Spitfire had been shot down over Italy. After five months with partisans, he had made a dashing journey to safety.

一年后，即1944年，他的喷火战机(二战中的英国空军战斗机型号之一，译注)在意大利被击落，因此他进行了五个月的游击活动，最后成功脱险。

3.The partisans resisted the enemy stubbornly.

游击队对敌人进行了顽强的抵抗。

4.The scout reported that the partisans were on the move.

侦察后报告游击队员正在转移。

5.We must increase the ranks of our partisans.

我们必须扩充我们的游击队。

6.And it is all presented, in the panegyrics of its partisans, as a net economic gain without offsets.

拥护者对此推崇备至，说这里创造了没有负面效应的经济净收益。

7.Eager partisans could supply you with a stock of ready answers.

热心的党人是能够向你提出一套现成的答案的。

8."Just doing my job," he recalled, as grizzled partisans of a similar vintage warmly embraced him.

“只是在完成我的工作”他回忆道，有着相似经历的头发斑白的老游击队员们热情拥抱了他。

9.Partisans, create unbearable conditions for enemies at their rear.

游击队员为尾随其后的敌人所准备的恶劣环境。

10.The political debate was heated, with both sides accusing each other of being biased 党派人士.

政治辩论激烈，双方都指责对方是有偏见的党派人士。

11.During the election season, 党派人士 often engage in fierce campaigning to win votes.

在选举季节，党派人士通常会进行激烈的竞选以赢得选票。

12.The documentary highlighted the role of 党派人士 in shaping public opinion during the war.

这部纪录片突出了党派人士在战争期间塑造公众舆论的作用。

13.Many 党派人士 refuse to compromise on their beliefs, leading to political gridlock.

许多党派人士拒绝在信仰上妥协，导致政治僵局。

14.The rally was filled with passionate 党派人士 waving banners and chanting slogans.

集会上充满了热情的党派人士挥舞着横幅并高喊口号。

作文

In today's political landscape, the term partisans (党派支持者) has become increasingly relevant. As societies around the world grapple with complex issues, individuals often find themselves aligning with specific political parties or movements, leading to a phenomenon known as partisanship. This alignment can significantly influence public discourse and decision-making processes. Partisanship can be defined as the strong support of a particular political party or faction. It often results in polarized views, where individuals identify more with their party's stance rather than considering a broader perspective. This polarization can hinder constructive dialogue and compromise, which are essential for any democratic society. One of the primary consequences of extreme partisanship is the division it creates among citizens. When people become too entrenched in their beliefs, they may dismiss opposing viewpoints outright. This behavior not only affects personal relationships but also has significant implications for governance. For instance, legislative bodies may struggle to pass crucial laws because members are unwilling to cooperate with those from opposing parties. Instead of working together for the common good, partisans (党派支持者) often engage in battles that prioritize winning over collaboration. Moreover, the media plays a substantial role in exacerbating partisanship. News outlets frequently cater to specific audiences, reinforcing existing biases and promoting a narrow view of issues. This can create echo chambers where partisans (党派支持者) only hear information that aligns with their beliefs, further entrenching their positions. As a result, misinformation can spread rapidly, making it even more challenging for individuals to engage in informed discussions. Despite these challenges, there are ways to bridge the gap between partisans (党派支持者) and promote a more inclusive political environment. One approach is to encourage dialogue through community forums and discussions that bring together individuals from different backgrounds and beliefs. By fostering an atmosphere of respect and understanding, participants can explore diverse perspectives and find common ground. Education also plays a critical role in mitigating partisanship. Teaching critical thinking skills and media literacy can empower individuals to analyze information more effectively and question their own biases. When people are equipped with the tools to evaluate sources and understand different viewpoints, they are less likely to fall into the trap of blind allegiance to a party. In conclusion, while the phenomenon of partisans (党派支持者) is deeply embedded in our political systems, it is essential to recognize its potential drawbacks. By fostering open dialogue and promoting education, we can work towards a more united society where diverse opinions are valued, and collaboration is prioritized. Only then can we hope to overcome the divisive nature of partisanship and build a brighter future for all citizens.

在当今的政治格局中，术语partisans（党派支持者）变得越来越相关。随着世界各地的社会应对复杂问题，个人往往发现自己与特定的政党或运动保持一致，这导致了被称为党派主义的现象。这种一致性可以显著影响公共话语和决策过程。 党派主义可以定义为对特定政党或派别的强烈支持。它常常导致观点的极化，个人更多地认同自己党派的立场，而不是考虑更广泛的视角。这种极化可能会阻碍建设性的对话和妥协，而这些对于任何民主社会都是至关重要的。 极端党派主义的主要后果之一是它在公民之间造成的分裂。当人们过于固执于自己的信念时，他们可能会完全否定对立观点。这种行为不仅影响个人关系，还对治理产生重大影响。例如，立法机构可能会因为成员不愿与来自对立党的同事合作而难以通过重要法律。partisans（党派支持者）往往参与优先考虑胜利而非合作的斗争，而不是为了共同利益而共同努力。 此外，媒体在加剧党派主义方面发挥了重要作用。新闻机构通常迎合特定受众，加强现有偏见并促进狭隘的议题看法。这可能会创造出回音室，在这里，partisans（党派支持者）仅听到与自己信仰一致的信息，从而进一步巩固他们的立场。因此，错误信息可能迅速传播，使个人更难参与知情讨论。 尽管面临这些挑战，但仍然有办法弥合partisans（党派支持者）之间的鸿沟，并促进更具包容性的政治环境。一种方法是通过社区论坛和讨论鼓励对话，聚集来自不同背景和信仰的人。通过营造尊重和理解的氛围，参与者可以探索多样的观点并找到共同点。 教育在减轻党派主义方面也发挥着关键作用。教授批判性思维技能和媒体素养可以使个人更有效地分析信息并质疑自己的偏见。当人们具备评估来源和理解不同观点的工具时，他们就不太可能陷入对党派的盲目忠诚。 总之，虽然partisans（党派支持者）这一现象深深植根于我们的政治体系中，但重要的是要认识到其潜在的缺点。通过促进开放的对话和推动教育，我们可以朝着一个更加团结的社会努力，在这个社会中，多样的意见受到重视，合作被优先考虑。只有这样，我们才能希望克服党派主义的分裂本质，为所有公民建立一个更光明的未来。