peremptoriness

简明释义

英[pəˈrɛmp.tər.nəs]美[pəˈrɛmptərnəs]

n. 专横，蛮横；武断

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The passivity of adjudicative power is capable of preventing a judges peremptoriness effectively and ensuring fair adjudications.

司法权的被动性能有效防止审判权的专横擅断，确保裁判公正。

2.The passivity of adjudicative power is capable of preventing a judges peremptoriness effectively and ensuring fair adjudications.

司法权的被动性能有效防止审判权的专横擅断，确保裁判公正。

3.The manager's peremptoriness during the meeting left no room for discussion, making it clear that his decision was final.

经理在会议中的专断性让人没有讨论的余地，明确表明他的决定是最终的。

4.Her peremptoriness in demanding immediate results frustrated the team, who needed more time to complete the project.

她对立即结果的专断性要求让团队感到沮丧，因为他们需要更多时间来完成项目。

5.The judge's peremptoriness in the courtroom ensured that the proceedings moved quickly and efficiently.

法官在法庭上的专断性确保了审理程序迅速而高效。

6.His peremptoriness when giving orders made it difficult for his subordinates to voice their opinions.

他下命令时的专断性使得下属很难表达自己的意见。

7.The teacher's peremptoriness in enforcing rules created an atmosphere of fear among students.

老师在执行规则时的专断性在学生中创造了一种恐惧的氛围。

作文

The concept of authority often comes with a unique set of challenges and responsibilities. In various aspects of life, whether in personal relationships, workplace dynamics, or even societal structures, the way authority is exercised can significantly impact the environment. One term that encapsulates a certain style of authority is peremptoriness, which refers to a commanding nature that does not allow for refusal or contradiction. This quality can be both beneficial and detrimental, depending on the context in which it is applied. In leadership roles, a degree of peremptoriness can be necessary to make swift decisions and maintain order. For instance, during a crisis, leaders must often take decisive actions without waiting for consensus. This decisiveness can instill confidence among team members, as they look to their leader for direction. However, when peremptoriness becomes excessive, it can lead to resentment and a lack of collaboration. Team members may feel undervalued and ignored, which can stifle creativity and innovation. Moreover, in personal relationships, the presence of peremptoriness can create an imbalance of power. When one partner consistently makes unilateral decisions, it can lead to feelings of frustration and helplessness in the other. Healthy relationships thrive on mutual respect and open communication, where both parties feel heard and valued. Therefore, while a certain level of assertiveness is essential, it is crucial to balance peremptoriness with empathy and understanding. In the realm of education, teachers often grapple with the challenge of maintaining authority while fostering a positive learning environment. A teacher who exhibits peremptoriness might enforce rules rigidly, leaving little room for student input or discussion. While this approach can lead to a structured classroom, it may also discourage students from expressing their thoughts and engaging critically with the material. On the contrary, educators who encourage dialogue and collaboration tend to cultivate a more dynamic and inclusive atmosphere. Furthermore, in societal structures, peremptoriness can be seen in the governance of laws and regulations. While it is vital for laws to be enforced decisively to ensure order and safety, overly authoritarian measures can infringe on individual freedoms and rights. The challenge lies in finding a balance between enforcing rules and allowing for personal liberties. Societies that embrace democratic principles often promote dialogue and participation, mitigating the risks associated with peremptoriness. In conclusion, the term peremptoriness embodies a style of authority that can serve essential functions in various contexts. Its ability to command respect and prompt action is invaluable, especially in situations requiring immediate responses. However, it is equally important to recognize the potential downsides of such an approach. Striking a balance between decisiveness and openness is crucial for effective leadership, healthy relationships, and a just society. Ultimately, understanding the nuances of peremptoriness can lead to more thoughtful and effective interactions in all areas of life.

权威的概念常常伴随着一系列独特的挑战和责任。在生活的各个方面，无论是个人关系、职场动态，还是社会结构，权威的行使方式都能显著影响环境。一个能够概括某种权威风格的术语是专断性，它指的是一种命令性的特质，不允许拒绝或反驳。这种特质在不同的背景下可以是有益的，也可能是有害的。 在领导角色中，适度的专断性在迅速做出决策和维持秩序时往往是必要的。例如，在危机期间，领导者通常必须在不等待共识的情况下采取果断行动。这种果断可以增强团队成员的信心，因为他们期望领导者提供方向。然而，当专断性过于强烈时，可能会导致怨恨和缺乏合作。团队成员可能会感到被低估和忽视，这可能会扼杀创造力和创新。 此外，在个人关系中，专断性的存在可能会造成权力的不平衡。当一个伴侣始终单方面做决定时，另一个伴侣可能会感到沮丧和无助。健康的关系依赖于相互尊重和开放的沟通，双方都感到被倾听和重视。因此，虽然一定程度的果断是必需的，但将专断性与同情和理解相结合至关重要。 在教育领域，教师常常面临维护权威与营造积极学习环境之间的挑战。表现出专断性的教师可能会严格执行规则，几乎没有学生的意见或讨论空间。虽然这种方法可以导致课堂的结构化，但也可能会阻止学生表达自己的想法，并批判性地参与材料。因此，鼓励对话和合作的教育工作者往往能够培养更具活力和包容性的氛围。 此外，在社会结构中，专断性可以在法律和法规的治理中看到。虽然果断地执行法律对于确保秩序和安全至关重要，但过于专制的措施可能会侵犯个人的自由和权利。挑战在于找到强制规则与允许个人自由之间的平衡。拥抱民主原则的社会通常促进对话和参与，从而减轻与专断性相关的风险。 总之，术语专断性体现了一种在各种背景下都能发挥重要作用的权威风格。它能够命令他人的尊重并促进行动，这在需要立即响应的情况下是无价的。然而，同样重要的是要认识到这种方法的潜在缺点。在果断和开放之间取得平衡对于有效的领导、健康的关系和公正的社会至关重要。最终，理解专断性的细微差别可以导致在生活各个领域更深思熟虑和有效的互动。