pettifogging

简明释义

英[ˈpetɪfɒɡɪŋ]美[ˈpetɪfɔːɡɪŋ]

adj. 骗人的；琐碎的，无用的；诡辩的

n. 诡辩，欺骗

v. 欺诈；诡辩（pettifog 的 ing 形式）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Freed from the pettifogging concerns of quibbling lawyers and self-serving politicians, goes the argument, he can concentrate on eradicating extremism.

有个论调说，摆脱了吹毛求疵的律师和自私的政客们的所谓的关心，他能够集中精力根除极端主义。

2.Freed from the pettifogging concerns of quibbling lawyers and self-serving politicians, goes the argument, he can concentrate on eradicating extremism.

有个论调说，摆脱了吹毛求疵的律师和自私的政客们的所谓的关心，他能够集中精力根除极端主义。

3.The handling is simple and is a far cry from pettifogging tidy structure.

处理简单，是相去甚远讼棍整齐的结构。

4.The lawyer's pettifogging 纠缠琐事 in court only delayed the trial.

律师在法庭上的pettifogging 纠缠琐事只延误了审判。

5.Her pettifogging 斤斤计较 about the details made the project take much longer than expected.

她对细节的pettifogging 斤斤计较使得项目比预期花费了更长的时间。

6.The teacher was frustrated by the student's pettifogging 无关紧要的争论 during the discussion.

老师对学生在讨论中进行的pettifogging 无关紧要的争论感到沮丧。

7.In negotiations, his pettifogging 挑剔细节 caused a breakdown in communication.

在谈判中，他的pettifogging 挑剔细节导致了沟通的破裂。

8.The accountant's pettifogging 小心翼翼 over minor expenses wasted valuable time.

会计师对小额开支的pettifogging 小心翼翼浪费了宝贵的时间。

作文

In the realm of law and politics, one often encounters various styles of argumentation and debate. Among these styles, there exists a particularly insidious approach that can undermine the integrity of any discussion. This approach is known as pettifogging, which refers to the act of quibbling over trivial matters or engaging in petty arguments rather than addressing the core issues at hand. The term itself has a somewhat archaic feel, yet its relevance in contemporary discourse cannot be overstated. When individuals resort to pettifogging, they distract from significant topics by focusing on minutiae that have little bearing on the overall argument. For instance, in political debates, candidates may engage in pettifogging by nitpicking each other's past statements or missteps, rather than discussing their policies and visions for the future. This tactic not only frustrates voters who seek substantive dialogue but also erodes trust in the political process. Moreover, pettifogging can manifest in everyday conversations as well. Imagine a situation where two friends are discussing plans for a vacation. Instead of focusing on the destination, budget, or activities, one friend might fixate on the color of the travel brochures or the font used in the itinerary. Such behavior, while seemingly harmless, can derail meaningful planning and lead to unnecessary frustration. The prevalence of pettifogging in various contexts highlights a broader issue: the tendency to prioritize style over substance. In an age where social media amplifies voices, the temptation to engage in pettifogging becomes even greater. People may find themselves caught up in trending debates that revolve around trivialities, neglecting more pressing issues such as climate change, social justice, or economic inequality. To combat pettifogging, it is essential to cultivate critical thinking skills and encourage open-mindedness. When participating in discussions, individuals should strive to focus on the larger picture and engage with the ideas being presented, rather than getting lost in the weeds of minor details. This requires active listening and a willingness to challenge one's own assumptions. In conclusion, while pettifogging may seem like a harmless quirk of conversation, it can have far-reaching consequences in both personal relationships and public discourse. By recognizing and addressing this tendency, we can foster more meaningful discussions that truly address the issues that matter. Ultimately, steering clear of pettifogging allows us to engage in richer, more productive dialogues that can lead to real understanding and progress.

在法律和政治领域，人们常常会遇到各种辩论和争论风格。在这些风格中，存在一种特别阴险的方法，它可能会破坏任何讨论的完整性。这种方法被称为pettifogging，指的是对琐事进行争论或参与小争吵，而不是解决核心问题。这个术语本身有些过时，但它在当代话语中的相关性不容小觑。 当个人诉诸于pettifogging时，他们通过关注与整体论点几乎没有关系的小事来分散对重要主题的注意力。例如，在政治辩论中，候选人可能会通过挑剔对方过去的言论或失误来进行pettifogging，而不是讨论他们的政策和未来愿景。这种策略不仅让寻求实质性对话的选民感到沮丧，还侵蚀了人们对政治过程的信任。 此外，pettifogging也可以在日常对话中表现出来。想象一下，两位朋友正在讨论度假计划。一个朋友可能会专注于旅行手册的颜色或行程中使用的字体，而不是关注目的地、预算或活动。这样的行为虽然看似无害，但却可能使有意义的规划偏离轨道，并导致不必要的挫败感。 pettifogging在各种背景中的普遍存在突显了一个更广泛的问题：优先考虑风格而非实质的倾向。在社交媒体放大声音的时代，参与pettifogging的诱惑变得更大。人们可能发现自己陷入围绕琐事的热门辩论，而忽视气候变化、社会正义或经济不平等等更紧迫的问题。 为了对抗pettifogging，培养批判性思维能力和鼓励开放心态至关重要。在参与讨论时，个人应努力关注更大局面，并与所提出的思想进行互动，而不是在琐碎细节中迷失方向。这需要积极倾听和挑战自身假设的意愿。 总之，尽管pettifogging看似是对话中的一种无害怪癖，但它在个人关系和公共话语中可能产生深远的影响。通过识别和解决这一倾向，我们可以促进更有意义的讨论，真正解决重要问题。最终，避免pettifogging使我们能够参与更丰富、更具生产力的对话，从而实现真正的理解和进步。