philippic

简明释义

英[fɪˈlɪpɪk]美[fəˈlɪpɪk]

n. 激烈的抨击

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.What is the significance of the Philippic?

它依托的价值信念是什么？

2.What is the significance of the Philippic?

它依托的价值信念是什么？

3.The senator delivered a passionate philippic against the proposed budget cuts.

这位参议员对提议的预算削减发表了热情洋溢的激烈抨击。

4.After listening to the philippic from his opponent, he decided to change his strategy.

在听完对手的激烈抨击后，他决定改变策略。

5.Her article was filled with a philippic aimed at the government's policies.

她的文章充满了针对政府政策的激烈抨击。

6.The activist's philippic against environmental neglect moved many in the audience.

这位活动家对环境忽视的激烈抨击打动了许多听众。

7.He often resorts to a philippic when discussing political issues.

他在讨论政治问题时常常诉诸于激烈抨击。

作文

In the realm of politics and public discourse, the term philippic refers to a bitter verbal attack or denunciation. This word has its origins in the speeches made by the ancient Greek orator Demosthenes against King Philip II of Macedon, which were characterized by their passionate and vehement nature. Today, the use of philippic has evolved to encompass any sharp criticism or tirade directed at individuals or institutions. The significance of understanding the concept of philippic lies in its frequent occurrence in contemporary political debates and discussions. For instance, during election seasons, candidates often launch philippics against their opponents, aiming to undermine their credibility and sway public opinion. These attacks can be both strategic and emotionally charged, designed to resonate with voters who may feel strongly about certain issues. A recent example of a philippic can be seen in the heated exchanges between political leaders on social media platforms. In a world where communication is instantaneous, a well-crafted philippic can go viral, reaching millions within minutes. This phenomenon highlights the power of language and rhetoric in shaping public perception and influencing political outcomes. However, the use of philippics is not without its drawbacks. While they can effectively rally support and galvanize a base, they can also contribute to a toxic political environment. When discourse devolves into personal attacks and vitriol, it detracts from meaningful conversations about policies and solutions. Voters may become disillusioned or apathetic, feeling that the political arena is more about insults than ideas. Moreover, the prevalence of philippics can lead to polarization, as individuals align themselves with one side or another based on emotional responses rather than rational analysis. This division can hinder compromise and collaboration, making it increasingly difficult to address pressing societal issues. In light of these considerations, it is crucial for both politicians and the public to recognize the implications of employing philippics in discourse. While expressing dissent and criticism is a vital part of democracy, it is equally important to engage in constructive dialogue that fosters understanding and cooperation. Ultimately, the challenge lies in balancing the passion that drives a philippic with the need for civility and respect in communication. By striving to articulate our beliefs and disagreements without resorting to hostility, we can elevate the quality of public discourse and work towards a more informed and engaged citizenry. Understanding the term philippic is thus not merely an exercise in vocabulary, but a reflection of our commitment to fostering a political culture that values reason and dialogue over division and animosity.

在政治和公共话语的领域中，术语philippic指的是一种尖锐的口头攻击或谴责。这个词源于古希腊演说家德摩斯梯尼对马其顿国王菲利普二世的演讲，这些演讲以其热情和激烈的性质而著称。如今，philippic的使用已演变为涵盖针对个人或机构的任何尖锐批评或抨击。 理解philippic这一概念的重要性在于它在当代政治辩论和讨论中的频繁出现。例如，在选举季节，候选人往往会对对手发起philippics，旨在削弱他们的可信度并影响公众舆论。这些攻击可以是战略性的，也可以是情感充沛的，旨在引起对某些问题感到强烈的选民的共鸣。 最近一个关于philippic的例子可以在政治领袖之间的社交媒体平台上看到。在一个交流瞬息万变的世界中，一个精心制作的philippic可以迅速传播，几分钟内就能接触到数百万人。这一现象突显了语言和修辞在塑造公众认知和影响政治结果方面的力量。 然而，使用philippics并非没有缺点。虽然它们可以有效地集结支持并激励基础，但也可能导致有毒的政治环境。当话语退化为人身攻击和恶言相向时，它会削弱有关政策和解决方案的有意义的对话。选民可能会变得失望或冷漠，觉得政治领域更多的是关于侮辱而不是思想。 此外，philippics的普遍存在可能导致两极化，因为个人根据情感反应而不是理性分析来与一方或另一方对立。这种分裂可能妨碍妥协与合作，使得解决紧迫的社会问题变得愈加困难。 考虑到这些因素，政治家和公众都必须认识到在话语中使用philippics的影响。虽然表达异议和批评是民主制度的重要组成部分，但同样重要的是参与促进理解与合作的建设性对话。 最终，挑战在于平衡推动philippic的激情与交流中对文明和尊重的需求。通过努力阐明我们的信念和分歧，而不诉诸敌意，我们可以提升公共话语的质量，并朝着更具信息性和参与性的公民社会迈进。因此，理解philippic这一术语不仅仅是词汇练习，而是我们致力于培养重视理性和对话而非分裂和敌意的政治文化的体现。