pinkos

简明释义

英[/ˈpɪŋkoʊz/]美[/ˈpɪŋkoʊz/]

n. 左倾分子；政治观点有点左倾的人（pinko 的变形）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Earth's dire atmospheric situation was confirmed by November 2012 reports from such tree-hugging pinkos.

2012年11月，来自这些抱树的平克人的报告证实了地球可怕的大气状况。

2.Earth's dire atmospheric situation was confirmed by November 2012 reports from such tree-hugging pinkos.

2012年11月，来自这些抱树的平克人的报告证实了地球可怕的大气状况。

3.Some people refer to those who advocate for social reforms as pinkos.

有些人将倡导社会改革的人称为粉红分子。

4.In the debate, he dismissed her arguments by calling her a pinkos.

在辩论中，他通过称她为粉红分子来驳斥她的观点。

5.The article criticized the pinkos for their unrealistic views on government policy.

这篇文章批评了粉红分子对政府政策的不切实际的看法。

6.Many pinkos believe in the redistribution of wealth as a means to achieve equality.

许多粉红分子相信通过财富再分配来实现平等。

7.He always joked about his friends being pinkos whenever they discussed politics.

每当朋友们讨论政治时，他总是开玩笑说他们是粉红分子。

作文

In the political landscape of the United States, the term pinkos has often been used to describe individuals or groups that are perceived as having leftist or socialist tendencies. This label can be quite derogatory, often implying that the person is not fully committed to traditional American values and may advocate for policies that are seen as too progressive or radical. Understanding the context in which the term pinkos is used is essential for grasping its implications in political discourse. Historically, the term gained traction during the Cold War era, a time when communism was viewed as a significant threat to democracy and capitalism. Those who supported social reforms or expressed sympathy towards socialist ideas were often labeled as pinkos, suggesting that they were only a shade away from being full-blown communists. This association created a stigma around the term, causing many to shy away from discussing leftist ideas openly for fear of being branded as pinkos. In contemporary society, the term continues to evoke strong reactions. For some, it is a badge of honor, representing a commitment to social justice, environmental causes, and economic equality. These individuals may embrace the label pinkos as a way to challenge the status quo and advocate for change. On the other hand, critics of these movements often use the term to discredit opponents, painting them as out of touch with mainstream values or as threats to the capitalist framework. The usage of pinkos highlights the polarization present in modern political discussions. It serves as a reminder of how language can shape perceptions and influence public opinion. When people hear the term pinkos, they may immediately conjure images of radical activists or perceive an underlying agenda that seeks to undermine traditional institutions. This knee-jerk reaction can hinder productive dialogue and prevent a deeper understanding of the issues at hand. Moreover, the term pinkos reflects broader societal attitudes towards political ideologies. In a nation where individualism and capitalism are celebrated, any deviation from these principles can be met with skepticism. The labeling of individuals as pinkos can serve to marginalize voices advocating for systemic change, ultimately stifling important conversations about equity and justice. To foster a more inclusive political environment, it is crucial to move beyond labels like pinkos. Instead of resorting to name-calling, individuals on all sides of the political spectrum should strive for understanding and empathy. Engaging in respectful dialogue can help bridge divides and illuminate the common ground that exists among differing viewpoints. In conclusion, the term pinkos carries with it a complex history and a multitude of connotations. Whether embraced or rejected, it illustrates the challenges faced in navigating political discourse today. By acknowledging the power of language and the impact of labels, we can work towards a more thoughtful and constructive exchange of ideas. It is essential to remember that behind every label lies a person with unique experiences and perspectives, deserving of respect and understanding. Only through open-mindedness can we hope to create a society that values diverse opinions and fosters meaningful change.

在美国的政治格局中，术语pinkos通常用来描述那些被认为具有左翼或社会主义倾向的个人或团体。这个标签常常带有贬义，暗示着这个人并不完全致力于传统的美国价值观，并可能主张被视为过于进步或激进的政策。理解术语pinkos使用的背景对把握其在政治话语中的含义至关重要。 历史上，这个术语在冷战时期得到了广泛传播，那时共产主义被视为对民主和资本主义的重大威胁。那些支持社会改革或对社会主义思想表示同情的人常常被贴上pinkos的标签，暗示他们只是离全然成为共产主义者一步之遥。这种联系为该术语创造了污名，使许多人因害怕被贴上pinkos的标签而不敢公开讨论左翼思想。 在当代社会，这个术语仍然引发强烈反应。对某些人来说，它是荣耀的象征，代表着对社会正义、环境事业和经济平等的承诺。这些人可能会将pinkos这个标签视为挑战现状和倡导变革的方式。另一方面，这些运动的批评者常常利用这个术语来抹黑对手，将他们描绘成脱离主流价值观或对资本主义框架构成威胁的人。 pinkos的使用突显了现代政治讨论中的两极分化。它提醒我们语言如何塑造认知和影响公众舆论。当人们听到pinkos这个词时，他们可能会立即联想到激进的活动家，或者感知到一种潜在的议程，试图破坏传统机构。这种条件反射的反应可能阻碍富有成效的对话，妨碍对相关问题的深入理解。 此外，术语pinkos反映了对政治意识形态的更广泛社会态度。在一个崇尚个人主义和资本主义的国家，任何偏离这些原则的行为都可能遭到怀疑。将个人标记为pinkos可能会边缘化倡导系统性变革的声音，最终扼杀关于公平和正义的重要对话。 为了促进一个更具包容性的政治环境，超越像pinkos这样的标签至关重要。与其诉诸于人身攻击，不如让政治光谱两端的个人努力寻求理解和同情。进行尊重的对话可以帮助弥合分歧，阐明不同观点之间存在的共同点。 总之，术语pinkos承载着复杂的历史和多重内涵。无论是被接受还是被拒绝，它都揭示了当今导航政治话语所面临的挑战。通过承认语言的力量和标签的影响，我们可以朝着更深思熟虑和建设性的思想交流迈进。重要的是要记住，在每一个标签背后，都有一个拥有独特经历和视角的人，值得尊重和理解。只有通过开放的心态，我们才能希望创造一个重视多元意见并促进有意义变革的社会。