plutocracy

简明释义

英[pluːˈtɒkrəsi]美[pluːˈtɑːkrəsi]

n. 富豪统治，富豪统治集团

复 数 p l u t o c r a c i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The maker of incredibly expensive carriages of the plutocracy fared far better than BMW and Aston Martin, which produce cars for the wealthy.

这个给超级富豪造车的汽车制造商比给一般富人造车的宝马和阿斯顿马丁的境况要好的多。

2.The maker of incredibly expensive carriages of the plutocracy fared far better than BMW and Aston Martin, which produce cars for the wealthy.

这个给超级富豪造车的汽车制造商比给一般富人造车的宝马和阿斯顿马丁的境况要好的多。

3.Nevertheless, a proud plantation-based plutocracy soon arose along the rivers from which they shipped their tobacco to England.

很快地，一个因烟草业致富的骄傲族群，沿着运烟草往英国的河畔建立了起来。

4.Mr Buffett has become a crusader for a higher inheritance tax, arguing that America risks an entrenched plutocracy without it.

巴菲特更高的遗产税的拥护者，争论说如果没有遗产税，美国就在危及根深蒂固的富豪统治模式。

5.Only this year tells a different story: a scarcity of new wealth, and a hardening of the plutocracy.

只是今年的故事有些不同寻常：缺乏新的财富。财富分配统治过于僵化。

6.The most prolific writer of the debunkers of the plutocracy was Gustavus Myers.

揭发富豪统治集团的作家中，最多产的是古斯塔夫斯·迈尔斯。

7.The most prolific of the debunkers of the plutocracy was Gustavus Myers.

揭发富豪统治集团的作家中，最多产的是古斯塔夫斯·迈尔斯。

8.Do you think America's plutocracy is becoming stale?

你认为美国富豪阶层正在成为一潭死水吗？

9.In a true plutocracy, the wealthy elite hold significant power over political decisions.

在一个真正的富豪政治中，富裕精英对政治决策拥有重要权力。

10.Critics argue that the current government is leaning towards plutocracy rather than democracy.

批评者认为当前政府正趋向于富豪政治而非民主。

11.Many believe that the influence of money in politics creates a plutocracy that undermines equality.

许多人认为，金钱在政治中的影响创造了一个富豪政治，削弱了平等。

12.The rise of corporate donations has led to concerns about a potential plutocracy in our electoral system.

企业捐款的增加引发了对我们选举系统中可能出现的富豪政治的担忧。

13.Some scholars suggest that ancient Rome was an example of a plutocracy due to its wealth concentration.

一些学者认为，古罗马是一个富豪政治的例子，因为其财富集中。

作文

In modern society, the term plutocracy refers to a system of governance where the wealthy elite hold significant power and influence over political decisions. This concept has been a topic of discussion among political scientists and economists for decades, as it raises questions about the fairness and equity of democratic systems. The rise of plutocracy can be traced back to the increasing concentration of wealth in the hands of a few individuals and corporations, leading to a disparity in political representation. Historically, many nations have experienced periods of plutocracy, where the rich dictated policies that favored their interests while neglecting the needs of the general population. For instance, during the Gilded Age in the United States, industrialists amassed enormous fortunes and wielded considerable influence over government officials, shaping legislation to protect their economic interests. This era serves as a reminder of how unchecked wealth can lead to a plutocracy that undermines democratic principles. The implications of plutocracy extend beyond mere political influence; they also affect social dynamics and economic opportunities. When wealth dictates power, the voices of ordinary citizens are often drowned out. Campaign financing, lobbying, and corporate donations can skew political agendas, making it challenging for average voters to have their concerns addressed. This raises critical questions about the integrity of the electoral process and whether true democracy can exist under a system influenced by plutocracy. Moreover, the advent of technology and social media has further complicated the landscape of plutocracy. Wealthy individuals and corporations can now leverage these platforms to amplify their messages and shape public opinion. This ability to control narratives can create an environment where the interests of a few overshadow the needs of the many, perpetuating a cycle of inequality. As citizens become increasingly aware of the implications of plutocracy, there is a growing demand for reforms to address these disparities. Movements advocating for campaign finance reform, wealth redistribution, and greater transparency in government are gaining traction. These efforts aim to dismantle the structures that enable plutocracy and promote a more equitable distribution of power. In conclusion, understanding the concept of plutocracy is essential for recognizing the challenges facing contemporary democracies. As wealth continues to concentrate, the risk of plutocracy looms larger, threatening the foundational ideals of equality and representation. It is crucial for citizens to remain vigilant and engaged in the political process, advocating for reforms that ensure a government truly representative of its people, rather than one beholden to the interests of the wealthy few. Only through collective action can we hope to combat the forces of plutocracy and create a more just society.

在现代社会中，术语plutocracy指的是一种治理体系，其中富裕精英对政治决策拥有重要的权力和影响。这一概念在政治科学家和经济学家中已讨论了几十年，因为它引发了关于民主制度的公平性和公正性的问题。plutocracy的兴起可以追溯到财富集中在少数个人和公司手中的趋势，这导致了政治代表性的不平等。 历史上，许多国家经历了plutocracy的时期，富人主导政策，偏袒自己的利益，同时忽视普通民众的需求。例如，在美国的镀金时代，工业家积累了巨额财富，并对政府官员施加了相当大的影响，塑造了保护其经济利益的立法。这一时代提醒我们，财富失控可能导致plutocracy，从而破坏民主原则。 plutocracy的影响不仅限于政治影响；它还影响社会动态和经济机会。当财富决定权力时，普通公民的声音往往被淹没。竞选融资、游说和企业捐赠可能使政治议程出现偏差，使普通选民难以解决他们的关切。这就提出了关于选举过程的完整性以及在受到plutocracy影响的制度下，真正的民主是否能够存在的关键问题。 此外，科技和社交媒体的出现进一步复杂化了plutocracy的格局。富裕个人和公司现在可以利用这些平台放大他们的信息并塑造公众舆论。这种控制叙事的能力可能会创造出一个环境，在这个环境中，少数人的利益压倒了多数人的需求，延续了不平等的循环。 随着公民越来越意识到plutocracy的影响，呼吁改革以解决这些差距的需求也在增长。倡导竞选融资改革、财富再分配和政府透明度的运动正在获得动力。这些努力旨在拆除使plutocracy成为可能的结构，促进权力的更公平分配。 总之，理解plutocracy的概念对于认识当代民主面临的挑战至关重要。随着财富的持续集中，plutocracy的风险变得愈发严重，威胁着平等和代表性的基础理想。公民必须保持警惕，积极参与政治过程，倡导确保政府真正代表其人民，而不是屈从于少数富人的利益的改革。只有通过集体行动，我们才能希望打击plutocracy的力量，创造一个更加公正的社会。