privatized

简明释义

英[ˈpraɪvətaɪzd]美[ˈpraɪvəˌtaɪzd]

使私有化（privatize 的过去式和过去分词）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The oil industry was privatized.

石油工业被私有化了。

2.In reaction to its activist orientation, a portion of the legal services program was also privatized.

针对其激进主义倾向，部分的法律服务计划也被私人化。

3.Four distribution companies have been privatized so far, out of a total of 20.

截至目前，在20家配电公司中，已有四家实行了私有化。

4.He joined one of Iceland's newly privatized Banks.

他去了冰岛新近私有化的多家银行中的一家。

5.Tony Stark: I have successfully privatized world peace.

托尼·斯塔克：“我已经成功的以一己之力让世界和平了。”

6.Six of Brazil's 27 states have semi-privatized jails.

巴西27个州中有6个拥有半私立监狱。

7.He doesn't fear anyone and has long privatized all the best meadows and pastures of the Valley of Geysers.

它任何人都不怕并且长期占据着间歇泉谷所有好的低洼地和草地。

8.The government has decided to privatized 私有化 the national railway system to improve efficiency.

政府决定将国家铁路系统私有化以提高效率。

9.After the company was privatized 私有化, it saw a significant increase in profits.

公司在私有化后，利润显著增加。

10.Many public services have been privatized 私有化 in recent years, leading to debates about their quality.

近年来，许多公共服务被私有化，引发了关于其质量的辩论。

11.The privatized 私有化 healthcare system has allowed for more competition among providers.

经过私有化的医疗系统允许提供者之间更多竞争。

12.Some argue that privatized 私有化 utilities lead to higher costs for consumers.

一些人认为，私有化的公用事业导致消费者成本上升。

作文

The concept of privatization has been a significant topic of discussion in the realms of economics and public policy. To understand this term, we must first define what it means. When a government or public entity sells its assets or services to private individuals or companies, this process is referred to as privatized (私有化). This shift from public to private ownership can have various implications for the economy and society at large. One major argument in favor of privatized (私有化) services is that they often lead to increased efficiency. Private companies, driven by profit motives, typically strive to reduce costs and improve services to attract more customers. For instance, when a previously state-run transportation system is privatized (私有化), it may implement better management practices and innovative technologies to enhance the user experience. This could result in more reliable services and improved infrastructure, benefiting the general public. However, the privatized (私有化) approach is not without its critics. Detractors argue that privatization can lead to a decrease in the quality of services. Since private companies prioritize profit, they may cut corners, leading to higher prices and reduced access for lower-income individuals. For example, if a healthcare system is privatized (私有化), it might become more difficult for those without sufficient financial resources to receive necessary medical care. This raises ethical concerns about equality and access to essential services. Moreover, the privatized (私有化) model can sometimes result in monopolies. When a single company gains control over a formerly public service, it may eliminate competition, leading to higher prices and fewer choices for consumers. In such cases, the advantages of privatization can be overshadowed by the negative consequences of reduced competition. Another critical aspect of privatized (私有化) services is the impact on employment. When industries are privatized (私有化), there can be significant job losses as new owners restructure operations to maximize profits. While some may argue that this leads to a more competitive job market, the immediate effect can be devastating for employees who lose their jobs without adequate support or retraining programs. In conclusion, the process of privatized (私有化) entails both potential benefits and drawbacks. It can lead to increased efficiency and innovation but may also compromise service quality and accessibility. As governments consider privatized (私有化) options for public services, it is crucial to weigh these factors carefully. Policymakers must ensure that the transition to privatization does not come at the expense of the most vulnerable members of society. Ultimately, the goal should be to create a balanced approach that combines the strengths of both public and private sectors to serve the common good effectively.

私有化的概念在经济学和公共政策领域一直是一个重要的讨论话题。要理解这个术语，我们首先必须定义它的含义。当政府或公共实体将其资产或服务出售给个人或私人公司时，这一过程被称为privatized（私有化）。这种从公共到私人所有权的转变对经济和社会整体可能产生各种影响。 支持privatized（私有化）服务的一个主要论点是，它们通常会导致效率的提高。由于私人公司受到利润驱动，通常会努力降低成本并改善服务以吸引更多客户。例如，当一个以前由国家运营的交通系统被privatized（私有化）时，它可能会实施更好的管理实践和创新技术，以增强用户体验。这可能导致更可靠的服务和改善的基础设施，从而使公众受益。 然而，privatized（私有化）的方法并非没有批评者。反对者认为，私有化可能导致服务质量下降。由于私人公司优先考虑利润，它们可能会削减开支，导致价格上涨并减少低收入人群的可及性。例如，如果一个医疗保健系统被privatized（私有化），那么对于那些没有足够经济资源的人来说，接受必要的医疗护理可能会变得更加困难。这引发了关于平等和获得基本服务的伦理问题。 此外，privatized（私有化）模式有时可能导致垄断。当单一公司控制一个曾经的公共服务时，它可能会消除竞争，导致消费者价格上涨和选择减少。在这种情况下，私有化的优势可能会被减少竞争的负面后果所掩盖。 privatized（私有化）服务的另一个关键方面是对就业的影响。当行业被privatized（私有化）时，由于新所有者重组运营以最大化利润，可能会出现大量失业。虽然一些人可能会争辩说这导致了更具竞争力的就业市场，但短期内的影响可能对失去工作而没有得到足够支持或再培训项目的员工造成严重打击。 总之，privatized（私有化）过程既包含潜在的好处，也存在缺点。它可以导致效率和创新的提高，但也可能损害服务的质量和可及性。随着各国政府考虑公共服务的privatized（私有化）选项，仔细权衡这些因素至关重要。政策制定者必须确保向私有化的过渡不会以牺牲社会最脆弱成员的利益为代价。最终，目标应是创造一种平衡的方法，将公共和私营部门的优势结合起来，有效地服务于公共利益。