punditry

简明释义

英[/ˈpʌndɪtri/]美[/ˈpʌndɪtri/]

n. 权威的意见

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.CONFOUNDING all punditry, Alex Salmond, Scotland's first minister, led his Scottish National Party (SNP) to a stunning victory in the devolved Parliament's elections on May 5th.

苏格兰首席部长，AlexSalmond，带领其苏格兰民族党在5月5日的议会选举中取得了令人惊奇的胜利，这让所有自命权威的人感到困惑不解。

2.CONFOUNDING all punditry, Alex Salmond, Scotland's first minister, led his Scottish National Party (SNP) to a stunning victory in the devolved Parliament's elections on May 5th.

苏格兰首席部长，AlexSalmond，带领其苏格兰民族党在5月5日的议会选举中取得了令人惊奇的胜利，这让所有自命权威的人感到困惑不解。

3.YET another bout of Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations was launched this week amid a splurge of pious public talk tempered by sceptical punditry.

新一轮以色列-巴勒斯坦和平会于本周举行，其间持怀疑态度的专家言论使虔诚民众抱有的一种奢望更加渺茫。

4.Katie Couric will also host a special Webcast that night with reporters and punditry, for which viewers can submit questions.

当天晚上主持人Katie Couric还会在和记者及评论家一起进行网络直播，网上观众能进行提问。

5.The other problem is this: contemporary punditry lives in the world of superficial tactics and interests.

另一个问题是：当代权威意见依然存在于世上肤浅的战术和利益之中。

6.But predicting such events is more in the realms of astrology than financial punditry.

但是对于这些事件的预期更多地是来自占星学家领域，而不是来自金融学权威。

7.The political analyst's punditry 评论 on the recent election was widely shared on social media.

这位政治分析师对最近选举的punditry 评论在社交媒体上广泛传播。

8.Many people turn to sports punditry 评论 for insights before big games.

许多人在大型比赛之前会寻求体育punditry 评论以获取见解。

9.The television show features a panel of experts who engage in lively punditry 评论 about current events.

这个电视节目有一个专家小组，他们就时事进行生动的punditry 评论。

10.Critics argue that much of the political punditry 评论 is biased and lacks depth.

批评者认为，许多政治punditry 评论存在偏见且缺乏深度。

11.His punditry 评论 on economic policies has influenced many voters.

他对经济政策的punditry 评论影响了许多选民。

作文

In today's world, the role of media and public discourse has evolved significantly, giving rise to a phenomenon known as punditry. This term refers to the practice of offering opinions or commentary on various subjects, particularly in politics, sports, and culture. As we navigate through an era of information overload, understanding the implications of punditry is crucial for both consumers and producers of content. The origins of punditry can be traced back to ancient times when scholars and experts would share their insights on matters of importance. However, with the advent of mass media and the internet, this practice has transformed dramatically. Today, anyone with access to a platform can engage in punditry, leading to a diverse range of voices and opinions. While this democratization of opinion-sharing can be seen as positive, it also raises questions about credibility and expertise. One of the defining features of punditry is its tendency to simplify complex issues into digestible sound bites. This is particularly evident in political commentary, where nuanced discussions are often overshadowed by sensationalism. For instance, during election seasons, pundits frequently reduce candidates' positions to catchy slogans, making it easier for the public to form opinions but potentially sacrificing a deeper understanding of the issues at stake. Moreover, the rise of social media has further amplified the reach of punditry. Platforms like Twitter and Facebook allow individuals to share their thoughts instantly, fostering a culture of immediacy. While this can facilitate important conversations, it can also lead to the spread of misinformation. The rapid-fire nature of social media often prioritizes speed over accuracy, resulting in a landscape where opinions can be mistaken for facts. In addition to these challenges, punditry also plays a significant role in shaping public perception. Influential commentators can sway public opinion and influence decision-making processes. For example, a well-known political analyst may provide commentary that resonates with a particular audience, thereby reinforcing existing beliefs and biases. This echo chamber effect can be detrimental to constructive dialogue, as it limits exposure to diverse perspectives. Despite these drawbacks, punditry can serve a valuable purpose in society. It encourages public engagement and fosters critical thinking among audiences. When individuals encounter different viewpoints, they are prompted to reassess their own beliefs and consider alternative perspectives. This can lead to a more informed citizenry, capable of engaging in meaningful discussions about pressing issues. In conclusion, while punditry has become a ubiquitous aspect of modern discourse, it is essential to approach it with a discerning eye. By recognizing the potential pitfalls of sensationalism and misinformation, consumers of punditry can better navigate the complexities of the information landscape. Ultimately, fostering a culture of critical engagement will empower individuals to make informed decisions and contribute to a more vibrant democratic society.

在当今世界，媒体和公共话语的角色发生了显著变化，产生了一种现象，被称为punditry。这个词指的是对各种主题，特别是政治、体育和文化，提供意见或评论的实践。当我们在信息过载的时代中导航时，理解punditry的影响对于内容的消费者和生产者都是至关重要的。 punditry的起源可以追溯到古代，当时学者和专家会分享他们对重要事务的见解。然而，随着大众媒体和互联网的出现，这一实践发生了巨大的变化。如今，任何有平台的人都可以参与punditry，导致各种声音和观点的多样化。虽然这种意见分享的民主化可以被视为积极的，但它也引发了关于可信度和专业性的质疑。 punditry的一个显著特征是将复杂问题简化为易于消化的短语。这在政治评论中尤为明显，微妙的讨论往往被耸人听闻的内容所掩盖。例如，在选举季节，评论员经常将候选人的立场简化为引人注目的口号，使公众更容易形成意见，但可能牺牲了对相关问题的深入理解。 此外，社交媒体的崛起进一步放大了punditry的影响。像推特和脸书这样的平台使个人能够即时分享他们的想法，培养了一种即时性的文化。虽然这可以促进重要的对话，但也可能导致错误信息的传播。社交媒体的快速性质往往优先考虑速度而非准确性，导致一种意见可以被误认为事实的局面。 除了这些挑战，punditry在塑造公众认知方面也发挥着重要作用。影响力较大的评论员可以左右公众舆论并影响决策过程。例如，一位知名的政治分析家可能提供与特定受众产生共鸣的评论，从而加强现有的信念和偏见。这种回音室效应可能对建设性的对话造成危害，因为它限制了接触多元观点的机会。 尽管存在这些缺点，punditry在社会中仍然可以发挥有价值的作用。它鼓励公众参与并促进观众的批判性思维。当个人遇到不同的观点时，他们会被促使重新评估自己的信念并考虑替代观点。这可以导致更具信息化的公民，能够参与对紧迫问题的有意义讨论。 总之，尽管punditry已成为现代话语的普遍组成部分，但以敏锐的眼光看待它是至关重要的。通过认识到耸人听闻和错误信息的潜在陷阱，punditry的消费者可以更好地驾驭信息环境的复杂性。最终，培养批判性参与的文化将赋予个人做出明智决策的能力，并为更生动的民主社会做出贡献。