punition

简明释义

英[/pjuˈnɪʃən/]美[/pjuˈnɪʃən/]

n. 惩罚（等于 punishment）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The administrative penalty of taxation is the measure of administrative sanctions against the administrative misfeasance to tax taken by tax authorities, which contains punition and compensation.

税务行政罚款是由税务机关作出的对税务行政违法行力的行政处罚措施，具有惩罚性与补偿性。

2.The administrative penalty of taxation is the measure of administrative sanctions against the administrative misfeasance to tax taken by tax authorities, which contains punition and compensation.

税务行政罚款是由税务机关作出的对税务行政违法行力的行政处罚措施，具有惩罚性与补偿性。

3.The teacher decided that a light punition 惩罚 was necessary for the students who were late.

老师决定对迟到的学生给予轻微的惩罚。

4.In some cultures, punition 惩罚 is seen as a way to teach discipline.

在一些文化中，惩罚被视为教育纪律的一种方式。

5.The coach imposed a strict punition 惩罚 on the players for not following the rules.

教练对不遵守规则的球员施加了严格的惩罚。

6.He felt that the punition 惩罚 he received was unfair and excessive.

他觉得自己受到的惩罚不公平且过重。

7.The company has a policy of punition 惩罚 for employees who arrive late to work.

公司对迟到的员工有惩罚政策。

作文

The concept of punition is often misunderstood in contemporary society. Many people equate punition with mere punishment, but it encompasses a broader range of meanings and implications. In essence, punition refers to the act of imposing a penalty or consequence for an action deemed unacceptable or harmful. It plays a crucial role in maintaining social order and deterring undesirable behavior. However, the application of punition can vary significantly depending on cultural, legal, and personal perspectives. In many societies, punition is seen as a necessary tool for justice. For instance, when someone commits a crime, the legal system often imposes punition in the form of fines, community service, or imprisonment. The underlying philosophy is that by holding individuals accountable for their actions, society can promote a sense of responsibility and discourage future offenses. This approach aims to rehabilitate offenders while also providing a sense of closure to victims and their families. However, the effectiveness of punition as a deterrent is a topic of debate among scholars and practitioners. Some argue that harsh punition may lead to a cycle of recidivism, where individuals who are punished harshly are more likely to re-offend due to a lack of support and rehabilitation. Others advocate for restorative justice practices, which focus on healing for both the victim and the offender rather than solely imposing punition. This approach encourages dialogue, understanding, and the opportunity for offenders to make amends, potentially leading to more positive outcomes for all parties involved. Furthermore, the ethical implications of punition cannot be overlooked. Questions arise about the fairness and proportionality of penalties. Is it just to impose severe punition for minor infractions? Are certain groups disproportionately affected by punitive measures? These questions highlight the need for a critical examination of how punition is applied in various contexts. In educational settings, punition takes on a different dimension. Teachers often use disciplinary measures to address misbehavior in the classroom. However, the goal should not solely be to punish students but to guide them towards better choices. Effective educators recognize that positive reinforcement and constructive feedback can often yield better results than traditional forms of punition. By fostering an environment of understanding and support, teachers can help students learn from their mistakes without resorting to excessive punition. In conclusion, while punition is an important aspect of societal functioning, it is essential to approach it thoughtfully and critically. Understanding its nuances can lead to more effective and humane applications, whether in the legal system, educational institutions, or personal relationships. Ultimately, the goal of punition should be to promote accountability and growth, rather than merely inflicting suffering. As we navigate the complexities of human behavior, let us strive to find a balance between justice and compassion, ensuring that punition serves a greater purpose in our lives and communities.

“惩罚”这一概念在当代社会中常常被误解。许多人将“惩罚”与单纯的惩罚等同起来，但它包含了更广泛的意义和含义。从本质上讲，“惩罚”是指对被认为不可接受或有害的行为施加处罚或后果的行为。它在维护社会秩序和威慑不良行为方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而，“惩罚”的应用因文化、法律和个人观点的不同而显著变化。 在许多社会中，“惩罚”被视为实现正义的必要工具。例如，当某人犯罪时，法律体系通常会以罚款、社区服务或监禁的形式施加“惩罚”。其背后的哲学是，通过让个人对自己的行为负责，社会可以促进责任感并抑制未来的犯罪。这种方法旨在 rehabilitate 罪犯，同时也为受害者及其家庭提供一种结束感。 然而，“惩罚”作为威慑手段的有效性是学者和从业者之间争论的话题。有些人认为，严厉的“惩罚”可能导致再犯循环，即受到严厉惩罚的个人由于缺乏支持和康复而更有可能再次犯罪。其他人则提倡恢复性司法实践，侧重于受害者和罪犯的疗愈，而不仅仅是施加“惩罚”。这种方法鼓励对话、理解，以及罪犯有机会弥补，从而可能导致所有相关方更积极的结果。 此外，“惩罚”的伦理影响也不容忽视。关于惩罚的公平性和比例性的问题浮出水面。对小过失施加严重的“惩罚”是否公正？某些群体是否受到惩罚措施的不成比例影响？这些问题突显了在各种背景下对“惩罚”应用进行批判性审视的必要性。 在教育环境中，“惩罚”又呈现出不同的维度。教师常常使用纪律措施来处理课堂上的不当行为。然而，目标不应仅仅是惩罚学生，而是指导他们做出更好的选择。有效的教育者认识到，积极的强化和建设性的反馈往往能比传统的“惩罚”形式产生更好的结果。通过营造理解和支持的环境，教师可以帮助学生从错误中学习，而无需诉诸过度的“惩罚”。 总之，虽然“惩罚”是社会运作的重要方面，但必须以深思熟虑和批判的态度来对待它。理解其细微差别可以导致在法律体系、教育机构或个人关系中的更有效和人道的应用。最终，“惩罚”的目标应该是促进责任感和成长，而不仅仅是施加痛苦。在我们应对人类行为的复杂性时，让我们努力在正义与同情之间找到平衡，确保“惩罚”在我们的生活和社区中发挥更大的作用。