questionable
简明释义
英[ˈkwestʃənəbl]美[ˈkwestʃənəbl]
adj. 可疑的;不确定的,有问题的;可能不诚实(或不道德)的,别有用心的
比 较 级 m o r e q u e s t i o n a b l e
最 高 级 m o s t q u e s t i o n a b l e
英英释义
可怀疑或质疑的;不确定或明确的。 | |
Subject to criticism or disapproval; questionable in quality or validity. | 可能受到批评或不赞成的;在质量或有效性上值得怀疑。 |
单词用法
可疑的行为 | |
可疑的决定 | |
可疑的做法 | |
可疑的动机 | |
提出可疑的问题 | |
认为这是可疑的 | |
发现某事可疑 | |
以可疑的方式 |
同义词
可疑的 | 提供的证据是可疑的。 |
反义词
确定的 | 我确信我们会成功。 | ||
无可置疑的 | 她的才能是无可置疑的。 | ||
明确的 | 我们需要在明天之前得到一个明确的答案。 |
例句
1.But whether the move was really necessary is questionable.
但是动用石油储备是否真的必要仍然受到质疑。
2.Whether poor kids in San Jose today still have the chance to move upward is questionable.
如今圣何塞贫苦的孩子是否仍有机会踏入社会上层还不得而知。
3.Gold's performance in the longer term is questionable.
从长远来看,黄金的表现是有问题的。
4.As this new science of habit has emerged, controversies have erupted when the tactics have been used to sell questionable beauty creams or unhealthy foods.
随着这种新的习惯科学出现,这些策略被用于销售问题美容霜或不健康食品时引发了争议。
5.He has been dogged by allegations of questionable business practices.
他一直被有可疑商业行为的传言困扰着。
6.There are still a few questionable points in the case.
这个案件还有几个疑点。
7.Sometimes original art works appear questionable or inauthentic because they've had so many restorers add touch-up layers to cover up damage, damage from the paint having deteriorated over time.
有时候艺术品真迹看起来是赝品,是因为很多修护人员添加了很多层保护膜,以覆盖油画上的损伤;而随着时间的推移,画作上损坏的地方已经恶化了。
8.Both ideas are questionable.
这两种想法都值得商榷。
9.It feels morally questionable, yet claims of genetic selection by intelligence are making headlines.
这在道德上令人怀疑,但智力决定基因选择的说法却成了头条新闻。
10.The validity of the research findings is questionable.
研究结果的有效性是可疑的。
11.His motives for helping were questionable at best.
他帮助的动机充其量是可疑的。
12.The company's financial practices have come under questionable scrutiny.
该公司的财务做法受到了可疑的审查。
13.She made a questionable decision that could affect her career.
她做出了一个可能影响她职业生涯的可疑的决定。
14.There are questionable claims about the product's effectiveness.
关于该产品有效性的说法是可疑的。
作文
In today's world, the concept of truth is often questionable. With the rise of social media and the internet, information can spread rapidly, but not all of it is accurate or reliable. This has led to a situation where people must critically evaluate the sources of their information. For instance, when reading news articles or watching videos online, it is essential to consider whether the content is credible or if it comes from a questionable source. As a result, individuals need to develop strong critical thinking skills to navigate through the vast amount of information available. Furthermore, the impact of questionable information can be significant. Misinformation can lead to public panic, misguided opinions, and even harmful actions. For example, during health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, questionable claims about treatments and vaccines proliferated online, causing confusion and fear among the public. In such scenarios, it is crucial for authorities to provide clear and accurate information to counteract the effects of questionable data. Moreover, the questionable nature of some research studies can also affect public perception and policy-making. When studies are funded by organizations with vested interests, the results may be biased, leading to questionable conclusions. This highlights the importance of transparency in research methodologies and funding sources. Policymakers must be aware of these factors when considering scientific findings to ensure that decisions are based on solid evidence rather than questionable claims. On a personal level, we encounter questionable situations daily. Whether it’s advice from friends, recommendations for products, or even political opinions, it is vital to approach these topics with a discerning mind. Engaging in discussions about questionable issues can help clarify misunderstandings and promote a more informed society. By questioning the validity of various claims, we encourage a culture of inquiry and skepticism that can lead to better decision-making. In conclusion, the questionable nature of information in our modern age necessitates a proactive approach to discernment. As consumers of information, we must strive to differentiate between credible sources and those that may not be trustworthy. By doing so, we can protect ourselves from misinformation and contribute to a more knowledgeable community. Ultimately, embracing critical thinking and questioning the questionable will empower us to navigate the complexities of today's information landscape effectively.
在当今世界,真相的概念常常是可疑的。随着社交媒体和互联网的兴起,信息传播迅速,但并非所有信息都是准确或可靠的。这导致人们必须批判性地评估他们信息的来源。例如,在阅读新闻文章或观看在线视频时,考虑内容是否可信或是否来自可疑的来源至关重要。因此,个人需要培养强大的批判性思维能力,以便在海量信息中穿行。 此外,可疑的信息的影响可能是显著的。错误信息可能导致公众恐慌、误导性意见,甚至有害行为。例如,在健康危机期间,如COVID-19大流行,关于治疗和疫苗的可疑的说法在网上泛滥,导致公众困惑和恐惧。在这种情况下,政府提供清晰和准确的信息以抵消可疑的数据的影响至关重要。 此外,一些研究的可疑的性质也会影响公众的看法和政策制定。当研究由有既得利益的组织资助时,结果可能会偏颇,导致可疑的结论。这突显了研究方法和资金来源透明度的重要性。政策制定者在考虑科学发现时,必须意识到这些因素,以确保决策基于坚实的证据,而不是可疑的说法。 在个人层面上,我们每天都会遇到可疑的情况。无论是朋友的建议、产品推荐,还是政治观点,重要的是以敏锐的头脑来对待这些话题。就可疑的问题进行讨论可以帮助澄清误解,并促进一个更有知识的社会。通过质疑各种说法的有效性,我们鼓励一种探究和怀疑的文化,这可以导致更好的决策。 总之,现代时代信息的可疑的性质需要我们采取积极的辨别态度。作为信息的消费者,我们必须努力区分可信的来源和那些可能不值得信赖的来源。这样,我们可以保护自己免受错误信息的影响,并为一个更有知识的社区做出贡献。最终,拥抱批判性思维并质疑可疑的事物将使我们能够有效应对当今信息环境的复杂性。
文章标题:questionable的意思是什么
文章链接:https://www.liuxue886.cn/danci/456295.html
本站文章均为原创,未经授权请勿用于任何商业用途
发表评论