questionably

简明释义

英[ˈkwestʃənəbli]美[ˈkwestʃənəbli]

adv. 可疑地，不清楚地；不可靠地

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The theory of evidence, called D-S theory, has great reasoning capacity in the questionably problems, and the dempster rule can provide theoretical foundation for the synergetic disposal of data.

证据理论在不确定性问题中有很强的推理能力，而且合成法则对数据的融合处理提供理论依据。

2.The theory of evidence, called D-S theory, has great reasoning capacity in the questionably problems, and the dempster rule can provide theoretical foundation for the synergetic disposal of data.

证据理论在不确定性问题中有很强的推理能力，而且合成法则对数据的融合处理提供理论依据。

3.The case for a stronger yen is also used by those who, more questionably, advocate higher interest rates on the grounds that keeping them low can contribute to asset bubbles.

主张上调利率的人也利用了赞同日元走强的理由，理由是将利率保持在低位会助长资产泡沫。

4.Yvonne Pendleton: The moon has gone from questionably interesting to absolutely fascinating.

伊冯·彭德尔顿：月球原本勉强称得上有趣，如今它简直令人着迷。

5.The restaurant received a review that was questionably positive, raising doubts about its authenticity.

这家餐厅收到了一条可疑地正面的评论，引发了对其真实性的怀疑。

6.His credentials are questionably legitimate, as he has not provided any proof.

他的资历可疑地合法，因为他没有提供任何证明。

7.The study's findings are questionably valid due to the small sample size.

由于样本量小，这项研究的结果可疑地有效。

8.She made a questionably ethical decision when she chose to accept the gift.

她选择接受这份礼物时做出了一个可疑地伦理的决定。

9.The product was marketed with questionably exaggerated claims.

该产品以可疑地夸大的宣传进行营销。

作文

In today's world, the concept of truth has become increasingly complex and, at times, questionably elusive. With the rise of social media and the rapid dissemination of information, individuals are often faced with a barrage of opinions that can blur the lines between facts and falsehoods. This phenomenon raises important questions about how we discern credible sources from those that are questionably reliable. One of the most significant challenges we face is the prevalence of misinformation. News articles, videos, and posts can be shared widely without proper verification, leading many to accept questionably accurate information as truth. For instance, during major events such as elections or public health crises, the spread of unverified claims can have serious consequences. People may make decisions based on questionably sourced information, which can affect their health, safety, and civic engagement. Moreover, the questionably nature of some information can be attributed to the biases of the sources. Media outlets may present news in a way that aligns with their political or financial interests, which can skew public perception. As consumers of information, it is essential for us to critically evaluate where our news comes from and consider whether the sources are questionably objective. Education plays a crucial role in combating the spread of misinformation. By teaching critical thinking skills and media literacy, we can empower individuals to analyze information more effectively. This education should encourage people to ask questions about the validity of the content they encounter. Are the claims supported by evidence? Is the source reputable? These inquiries can help identify questionably trustworthy information and reduce the likelihood of being misled. Furthermore, the responsibility does not solely lie with individuals; platforms that host content also have a duty to mitigate the spread of questionably accurate information. Social media companies have begun implementing fact-checking measures and algorithms designed to flag misleading content. However, these systems are not foolproof and can sometimes misclassify legitimate information as questionably false. Thus, ongoing improvements and transparency in these processes are necessary to ensure that users are adequately informed. In conclusion, navigating the modern information landscape requires vigilance and a discerning eye. The questionably nature of much of the content we encounter demands that we approach information with skepticism and a critical mindset. By fostering media literacy and encouraging responsible sharing practices, we can work towards a more informed society. Ultimately, understanding the questionably reliable nature of information will enable us to make better decisions and engage more thoughtfully with the world around us.

在当今世界，真相的概念变得越来越复杂，有时甚至变得可疑地难以捉摸。随着社交媒体的兴起和信息传播的快速发展，个人常常面临一系列模糊事实与虚假之间界限的意见。这一现象引发了关于我们如何辨别可信来源与那些可疑地可靠的信息的重要问题。 我们面临的一个重大挑战是错误信息的普遍存在。新闻文章、视频和帖子可以在未经适当验证的情况下广泛传播，导致许多人将可疑地准确的信息视为真相。例如，在选举或公共卫生危机等重大事件期间，未经验证的声明的传播可能会产生严重后果。人们可能基于可疑地来源的信息做出决定，这可能会影响他们的健康、安全和公民参与。 此外，一些信息的可疑地性质可以归因于来源的偏见。媒体机构可能以符合其政治或财务利益的方式呈现新闻，这可能会扭曲公众的认知。作为信息的消费者，我们有必要对新闻的来源进行批判性评估，并考虑这些来源是否可疑地客观。 教育在打击错误信息传播中发挥着至关重要的作用。通过教授批判性思维技能和媒体素养，我们可以赋予个人更有效地分析信息的能力。这种教育应该鼓励人们对他们遇到的内容的有效性提出质疑。声明是否有证据支持？来源是否可靠？这些询问可以帮助识别可疑地可信的信息，并减少被误导的可能性。 此外，责任不仅仅在于个人；承载内容的平台也有责任减轻可疑地准确的信息传播。社交媒体公司已经开始实施事实检查措施和设计用于标记误导性内容的算法。然而，这些系统并不是万无一失的，有时可能会将合法信息错误地归类为可疑地虚假。因此，持续改进和透明化这些过程是确保用户得到充分信息的必要条件。 总之，驾驭现代信息环境需要警惕和敏锐的目光。我们所遇到的许多内容的可疑地性质要求我们以怀疑和批判的心态对待信息。通过促进媒体素养和鼓励负责任的分享实践，我们可以朝着一个更加知情的社会努力。最终，理解信息的可疑地可靠性质将使我们能够做出更好的决策，更加深思熟虑地与周围的世界互动。