railroading

简明释义

英[ˈreɪlˌroʊdɪŋ]美[ˈreɪlˌroʊdɪŋ]

n. 铁路建设；仓促行事

v. 由铁路运输；乘火车旅行（railroad 的 ing 形式）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Foundation settlement, which plays an essential role in subgrade settlement, is highly concerned in high-speed railroading.

高速铁路对路基沉降的要求十分严格，地基沉降是路基沉降的重要部分。

2.Foundation settlement, which plays an essential role in subgrade settlement, is highly concerned in high-speed railroading.

高速铁路对路基沉降的要求十分严格，地基沉降是路基沉降的重要部分。

3.This package reflects China′s technologies of 90′s for railroading under complicated geographical conditions.

该成套技术反映我国九十年代在复杂地质条件下铁路建设水平。

4.The conclusion was instructive and might be a reference to railroading in high latitude permafrost.

所得结论对今后高纬度多年冻土区铁路建设具有重要的参考价值及指导意义。

5.I say the railroading problem is insurmountable.

我说铁路运输问题是克服不了的。

6.The committee accused the chairperson of railroading 强行推进 a decision without proper discussion.

委员会指责主席在没有适当讨论的情况下强行推进一个决定。

7.In the meeting, he felt that the proposal was being railroaded 强行通过 through despite objections.

在会议上，他觉得这个提案尽管有反对意见，却被强行通过了。

8.The lawyer claimed that the judge was railroading 偏袒 the prosecution during the trial.

律师声称法官在审判中对检方偏袒。

9.They accused the government of railroading 急于推行 legislation that favored big corporations.

他们指责政府急于推行有利于大公司的立法。

10.The students felt their opinions were being railroaded 忽视 by the administration.

学生们觉得他们的意见被行政管理层忽视。

作文

In the realm of law and politics, the term railroading refers to the process of pushing through legislation or legal decisions in a hurried or forceful manner, often disregarding standard procedures or due process. This practice can lead to significant consequences for democracy and justice. The concept of railroading is particularly concerning because it undermines the principles of fairness and transparency that are essential in any democratic society. Consider a scenario where a controversial bill is introduced in a legislative body. Advocates for the bill may employ tactics of railroading by limiting debate, bypassing committee reviews, and rushing the vote. This approach can stifle dissenting voices and prevent thorough examination of the bill's implications. For instance, if a new law is proposed that affects environmental regulations, a hasty passage could result in harmful consequences for ecosystems and public health. Moreover, railroading is not limited to legislative matters; it can also occur within judicial proceedings. In a courtroom setting, a prosecutor might attempt to railroad a defendant by pushing for a swift trial without allowing adequate time for defense preparation. This can lead to wrongful convictions and a miscarriage of justice, as the defendant may not have had the opportunity to present a robust defense. The implications of railroading extend beyond individual cases or bills. When such practices become commonplace, they erode public trust in institutions. Citizens may begin to feel that their voices are not heard, leading to apathy and disengagement from the political process. This disillusionment can jeopardize the very foundations of democracy, as people lose confidence in their ability to influence governance. Furthermore, railroading can create a toxic political environment. When one party uses aggressive tactics to push through their agenda, it can lead to increased polarization and animosity between opposing factions. This divisiveness makes it challenging to reach bipartisan agreements and fosters a culture of hostility rather than collaboration. To combat the negative effects of railroading, it is crucial for citizens to remain vigilant and engaged in the political process. Advocacy for transparency, accountability, and adherence to proper procedures can help ensure that legislation and judicial processes are conducted fairly. Grassroots movements and public awareness campaigns can play a vital role in holding elected officials accountable and demanding that they respect democratic norms. In conclusion, railroading represents a serious threat to the principles of democracy and justice. Whether in the context of legislation or judicial proceedings, the practice of hastily pushing through decisions without proper scrutiny can have dire consequences. It is essential for individuals to be aware of these tactics and to advocate for a political environment that values deliberation, transparency, and fairness. By doing so, we can help preserve the integrity of our democratic institutions and ensure that all voices are heard in the decision-making process.

在法律和政治领域，术语railroading指的是以匆忙或强制的方式推动立法或法律决定的过程，通常忽视标准程序或应有的程序。这种做法可能对民主和正义产生重大影响。railroading的概念尤其令人担忧，因为它破坏了任何民主社会中至关重要的公平和透明原则。 考虑一个场景，一个有争议的法案在立法机构中被提出。支持该法案的人可能会通过限制辩论、绕过委员会审查和匆忙投票等手段进行railroading。这种做法可能会压制异议声音，并阻止对法案影响的全面审查。例如，如果提出一项影响环境法规的新法律，匆忙通过可能导致对生态系统和公共健康的有害后果。 此外，railroading不仅限于立法事务；它也可以发生在司法程序中。在法庭上，检察官可能试图通过推动迅速审判而不允许足够的时间进行辩护准备来railroad被告。这可能导致错误定罪和正义的误判，因为被告可能没有机会提出有力的辩护。 railroading的影响超出了个别案件或法案。当这种做法变得司空见惯时，它会侵蚀公众对机构的信任。公民可能开始感到他们的声音没有被听到，从而导致冷漠和对政治过程的脱离。这种失望可能危及民主的基础，因为人们失去对影响治理能力的信心。 此外，railroading可能会造成有毒的政治环境。当一个政党使用激进战术推动其议程时，可能会导致对立派系之间的极端分化和敌意。这种分裂使得达成两党协议变得困难，并培养出一种敌对而非合作的文化。 为了抵御railroading的负面影响，公民保持警惕并参与政治过程至关重要。倡导透明度、问责制和遵循适当程序可以帮助确保立法和司法程序的公平进行。草根运动和公众意识活动在追究公职人员责任和要求他们尊重民主规范方面可以发挥重要作用。 总之，railroading代表了对民主和正义原则的严重威胁。无论是在立法还是司法程序的背景下，匆忙推动决策而没有适当审查的做法都可能带来可怕的后果。个人必须意识到这些战术，并倡导一个重视审议、透明和公平的政治环境。通过这样做，我们可以帮助维护民主机构的完整性，并确保在决策过程中所有声音都能被听到。