randomized

简明释义

英[ˈrændəmaɪzd;ˈrændəˌmaɪzd]美[ˈrændəmaɪzd]

adj. [数]随机化的，随机的

v. 使随机化；做任意排列（randomize 的过去分词）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Theirs was a randomized, controlled trial conducted in fourcities.

他们的研究是一个在四个城市进行的随机、控制试验。

2.Once randomized clinical trials are finally completed, it may turn out that chocolate does not actually produce much of a cardiac benefit after all.

一旦随机临床试验最终结束，也许结果巧克力根本不会产生很多心脏的益处。

3.Burke says that actually does seem to help, based on randomized studies—the researcher's gold standard.

伯克说，基于随机研究——研究人员的黄金标准，这似乎确实有所帮助。

4.Randomized controlled trials carry more weight.

随机对照试验更有信服力。

5.But they're more than just a randomized graphics program.

但是它们绝不是随机图案程序。

6.Another limitation of the study was that it was not randomized.

这项研究的另一个局限性是它没有随机化。

7.The study used a randomized 随机的 control trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the new drug.

这项研究使用了一个随机的对照试验来评估新药的有效性。

8.Participants were assigned to groups in a randomized 随机的 manner to eliminate bias.

参与者被以随机的方式分配到各组，以消除偏见。

9.A randomized 随机的 selection process was implemented to choose the winners of the contest.

实施了一个随机的选择过程来选出比赛的获胜者。

10.In the experiment, participants were randomized 随机分配 to either the treatment or control group.

在实验中，参与者被随机分配到治疗组或对照组。

11.The survey results were analyzed using a randomized 随机的 sampling method.

调查结果使用随机的抽样方法进行分析。

作文

In the field of research, particularly in medicine and psychology, the term randomized (随机化的) plays a crucial role in ensuring the validity and reliability of study results. A randomized (随机化的) controlled trial is often considered the gold standard for testing the efficacy of new treatments or interventions. This method involves randomly assigning participants to either the treatment group or the control group, which helps to eliminate bias and ensures that the groups are comparable. The importance of a randomized (随机化的) approach cannot be overstated. By using randomization, researchers can account for confounding variables that may influence the outcome of the study. For example, if a new drug is being tested, randomization allows researchers to ensure that factors such as age, gender, and pre-existing health conditions are evenly distributed across both groups. This way, any differences in outcomes can be attributed to the treatment itself rather than external factors. Moreover, randomized (随机化的) trials contribute to the reproducibility of research findings. When studies are conducted with a randomized (随机化的) design, other researchers can replicate the study under similar conditions to verify the results. This is essential for building a robust body of scientific knowledge. If a study is not randomized (随机化的), it may lead to questionable conclusions that cannot be reliably reproduced. In addition to medical research, the concept of randomized (随机化的) sampling is also prevalent in social sciences. For instance, when conducting surveys or experiments, researchers often use randomized (随机化的) methods to select their sample population. This ensures that every individual has an equal chance of being chosen, which enhances the representativeness of the sample and the generalizability of the findings. However, implementing a randomized (随机化的) design is not without its challenges. One major issue is the ethical considerations involved in randomly assigning participants to different groups, especially in clinical trials where one group may receive a placebo instead of the actual treatment. Researchers must navigate these ethical waters carefully to ensure that participants are treated fairly and that informed consent is obtained. Furthermore, practical limitations such as sample size and funding can affect the feasibility of conducting randomized (随机化的) trials. Smaller studies may lack the power to detect significant differences between groups, while larger studies may require substantial financial resources and time. Despite these challenges, the benefits of randomized (随机化的) research designs often outweigh the drawbacks, making them a preferred choice in many fields. In conclusion, the term randomized (随机化的) encapsulates a fundamental principle in research methodology that enhances the credibility and reliability of findings. Whether in clinical trials or social science studies, the use of randomized (随机化的) designs helps to mitigate bias, ensure comparability, and promote reproducibility. As researchers continue to strive for excellence in their work, embracing randomized (随机化的) approaches will undoubtedly lead to more robust and trustworthy conclusions that can inform practice and policy.

在研究领域，特别是在医学和心理学中，术语randomized（随机化的）在确保研究结果的有效性和可靠性方面发挥着至关重要的作用。随机对照试验通常被认为是测试新治疗或干预效果的金标准。这种方法涉及将参与者随机分配到治疗组或对照组，这有助于消除偏见，并确保各组之间的可比性。 randomized（随机化的）方法的重要性不容小觑。通过使用随机化，研究人员可以考虑可能影响研究结果的混杂变量。例如，如果正在测试一种新药，随机化允许研究人员确保年龄、性别和既往健康状况等因素在两个组之间均匀分布。这样，结果的任何差异都可以归因于治疗本身，而不是外部因素。 此外，randomized（随机化的）试验有助于研究结果的可重复性。当研究以randomized（随机化的）设计进行时，其他研究人员可以在类似条件下复制该研究以验证结果。这对于建立稳健的科学知识体系至关重要。如果一项研究不是randomized（随机化的），则可能导致无法可靠再现的可疑结论。 除了医学研究，randomized（随机化的）抽样概念在社会科学中也很普遍。例如，在进行调查或实验时，研究人员通常使用randomized（随机化的）方法来选择样本人群。这确保每个人都有平等的机会被选中，从而增强样本的代表性和研究结果的普遍适用性。 然而，实施randomized（随机化的）设计并非没有挑战。一个主要问题是随机分配参与者到不同组别时涉及的伦理考虑，尤其是在临床试验中，其中一个组可能会接受安慰剂而不是实际治疗。研究人员必须仔细处理这些伦理问题，以确保参与者受到公平对待，并获得知情同意。 此外，样本大小和资金等实际限制可能会影响进行randomized（随机化的）试验的可行性。较小的研究可能缺乏检测组间显著差异的能力，而较大的研究可能需要大量的财务资源和时间。尽管存在这些挑战，但randomized（随机化的）研究设计的好处往往超过缺点，使其在许多领域成为首选。 总之，术语randomized（随机化的）概括了研究方法论中的一个基本原则，该原则增强了发现的可信度和可靠性。无论是在临床试验还是社会科学研究中，使用randomized（随机化的）设计有助于减轻偏见，确保可比性，并促进可重复性。随着研究人员继续努力追求卓越，拥抱randomized（随机化的）方法无疑将导致更为稳健和可信的结论，从而为实践和政策提供信息。